CEO-employee pay gap and firm R&D efficiency

被引:14
|
作者
Chan, H. Leon [1 ]
Kawada, Brett [1 ]
Shin, Taekjin [2 ]
Wang, Jeff [1 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Coll Business Adm, Charles W Lamden Sch Accountancy, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[2] San Diego State Univ, Dept Management, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
Innovation; Corporate governance; Pay gap; R&D efficiency; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL COMPARISONS; INNOVATION; DISPERSION; COMPENSATION; PREDICTORS; INVESTMENT; TOURNAMENT;
D O I
10.1108/RAF-10-2018-0207
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aims to examine whether the pay gap between the chief executive officer (CEO) and non-executive employees affects the firm's research and development (R&D) efficiency. Design/methodology/approach The dependent variable is the firm's R&D efficiency, defined as a percentage increase in revenue from a 1-per cent increase in R&D spending. The main independent variable is the CEO-employee pay gap, defined as the ratio of annual total compensation for the CEO to the average of non-executive employees of the firm. The authors estimate fixed-effects models to examine the association between R&D efficiency and the pay gap between CEO and non-executive employees. Findings Results indicate a negative and significant association between R&D efficiency and CEO-employee pay gap, which suggests that a wider pay gap reduces employee motivation and effort, consistent with pay equity theory. We also find that the CEO-employee pay gap negatively moderates the relationship between employee pay growth and R&D efficiency Research limitations/implications Recently enacted pay gap disclosure requirements mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act will make the disparity between CEO and non-executive compensation more salient. This study provides evidence of a firm outcome associated with that disparity. Originality/value This study is among the first to investigate the impact of the pay gap on R&D efficiency, a firm outcome not previously explored in the literature. This study also investigates CEO-employee pay gap's role as a factor that moderates the effects of employee pay growth and institutional ownership on R&D efficiency
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 287
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reprint of "Predicting employee wrongdoing: The complementary effect of CEO option pay and the pay gap"
    Smulowitz, Stephen J.
    Almandoz, Juan
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2021, 166 : 104 - 116
  • [22] Impacts of CEO-employee pay disparity on investor behavior and market dynamics: Evidence from laboratory asset markets
    Yang, Xiaolan
    Wang, Jiaqi
    Chen, Shu
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 88
  • [23] External pay gap of R&D personnel and total factor productivity of enterprises
    Chen, Lingling
    Zhang, Chaolin
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 62
  • [24] The Positive Effects of Patent Performance, R&D Capability, and Employee Productivity on Firm Performance
    Chen, Yu-Shan
    [J]. 2011 PROCEEDINGS OF PICMET 11: TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT IN THE ENERGY-SMART WORLD (PICMET), 2011,
  • [25] The impact of firm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships
    Busom, Isabel
    Fernandez-Ribas, Andrea
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (02) : 240 - 257
  • [26] Economic policy uncertainty, CEO characteristics and firm R&D expenditure: a Bayesian analysis
    Jiang, Hui
    Liu, Caiyun
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 52 (34) : 3709 - 3731
  • [27] Who should pay for R&D?
    Berenson, RG
    [J]. PHOTONICS SPECTRA, 1999, 33 (10) : 12 - 12
  • [28] R&D employee training, the stock of technological knowledge, and R&D productivity
    Kim, Donggyu
    Lee, Chang-Yang
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2022, 52 (05) : 801 - 819
  • [29] Entrenchment or efficiency? CEO-to-employee pay ratio and the cost of debt
    Bardos, Katsiaryna
    Kozlowski, Steven E.
    Puleo, Michael R.
    [J]. FINANCIAL REVIEW, 2021, 56 (03) : 511 - 533
  • [30] Cooperative R&D and firm performance
    Belderbos, R
    Carree, M
    Lokshin, B
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (10) : 1477 - 1492