Comparing the Steady-State Procedures Based on Epsilon-Algorithm and Sensitivity Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Dobes, Josef [1 ]
Cerny, David [1 ]
Vejrazka, Frantisek [1 ]
Navratil, Vaclav [1 ]
机构
[1] Czech Tech Univ, Dept Radioelect, Fac Elect Engn, Tech 2, Prague 16627 6, Czech Republic
关键词
PSpice; Affirma RF; sensitivity analyses; steady state; interpolation; extrapolation; epsilon-algorithm; optimization; FREQUENCY; CIRCUITS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Although many programs have built-in various methods for finding the steady state nowadays, their actual implementations are often quite unsatisfactory regarding algorithm efficiency and reliability. We improved and checked procedures built on both epsilon-algorithm and sensitivity analysis in time domain. First of all, it was clearly demonstrated that increasing demands on the overall numerical accuracy do not lead to an excessive number of necessary integration steps and therefore LU factorizations correspondingly. This feature is especially significant for the suggested procedure based on the epsilon-algorithm. Furthermore, the practical experiments confirmed that a proposed arrangement of the extrapolation method is greatly insensitive to its order, which is even more important because a program user is unable to estimate the appropriate order for complicated circuits well. The properties of the methods are demonstrated using rectifier, C-class amplifier, and LNA for which exceptional attention was given to checking the insensitivity of the extrapolation to its order.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 604
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The BOLD sensitivity of rapid steady-state sequences
    Scheffler, Klaus
    Heule, Rahel
    Baez-Yanez, Mario G.
    Kardatzki, Bernd
    Lohmann, Gabriele
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2019, 81 (04) : 2526 - 2535
  • [32] STEADY-STATE SECURITY CONTROL USING A SENSITIVITY-BASED APPROACH
    CHANG, CL
    HSU, YY
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1990, 18 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [33] Ranking and selection for steady-state simulation: Procedures and perspectives
    Goldsman, D
    Kim, SH
    Marshall, WS
    Nelson, BL
    INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2002, 14 (01) : 2 - 19
  • [34] Multiple-comparison procedures for steady-state simulations
    Nakayama, MK
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1997, 25 (06): : 2433 - 2450
  • [35] A finite state projection method for steady-state sensitivity analysis of stochastic reaction networks
    Durrenberger, Patrik
    Gupta, Ankit
    Khammash, Mustafa
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 150 (13):
  • [36] UNCERTAINTY IN STEADY-STATE LIQUEFACTION EVALUATION PROCEDURES - CLOSURE
    KRAMER, SL
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1992, 118 (02): : 326 - 328
  • [37] UNCERTAINTY IN STEADY-STATE LIQUEFACTION EVALUATION PROCEDURES - DISCUSSION
    CASTRO, G
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1992, 118 (02): : 324 - 326
  • [38] Comparing mouse and steady-state visual evoked response-based control
    Jones, KS
    Middendorf, M
    McMillan, GR
    Calhoun, G
    Warm, J
    INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2003, 15 (04) : 603 - 621
  • [39] A new hybrid blind equalization algorithm with steady-state performance analysis
    Xie, Ning
    Hu, Hengyun
    Wang, Hui
    DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2012, 22 (02) : 233 - 237