Clinical Evaluation of Cement-Retained Implant-Supported CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns in Posterior Areas: Results of a 6-Year Prospective Clinical Study

被引:8
|
作者
Sorrentino, Roberto [1 ]
Ruggiero, Gennaro [1 ]
Toska, Eralda [1 ]
Leone, Renato [1 ]
Zarone, Fernando [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Federico II Naples, Dept Neurosci Reprod & Odontostomatol Sci, Div Prosthodont & Digital Dent, I-80131 Naples, Italy
来源
PROSTHESIS | 2022年 / 4卷 / 03期
关键词
CAD; CAM; implant-supported prosthesis; zirconia; dental implant; resin cement; monolithic zirconia; survival rate; implantology; MDP; titanium abutment; FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES; IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES; FRACTURE-RESISTANCE; MOLAR CROWNS; SCREW; ABUTMENTS; RECONSTRUCTIONS; RESTORATIONS; PERFORMANCE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.3390/prosthesis4030031
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; R318.08 [生物材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080501 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Background: Different technologies and materials can be used for implant-supported restorations in posterior areas. Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of CAD/CAM implant-supported monolithic zirconia single crowns (ZrSCs) cemented onto titanium abutments with a dual-curing resin cement after 6 years of use. Methods: Fifty patients in need of one single crown in posterior regions were enrolled. The patients were recalled for a follow-up after 6 months and then yearly for a total observation period of 6 years. The biological and technical complications were examined using criteria set by the United States Public Health Service (USPHS), whereas visual analogue scales (VASs) were used to evaluate the patients' aesthetic and functional satisfaction. Results: No patient was lost at follow-up; both the survival and success rates were 100%. No fractures, decementation, peri-implantitis, or soft tissue inflammation were recorded. Forty-six restorations were rated Alpha in each evaluated parameter of the USPHS's criteria. According to the patients' VASs assessments, the overall function of the ZrSCs was 8.4 (+/- 2.1), whereas the overall aesthetic was 8.7 (+/- 0.7). Conclusions: Monolithic zirconia single crowns cemented with dual-curing resin cements onto titanium abutments can be considered an effective clinical option in posterior regions after 6 years of function.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:383 / 393
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results
    Friederike Cantner
    Claudio Cacaci
    Thomas Mücke
    Peter Randelzhofer
    Jan Hajtó
    Florian Beuer
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2019, 23 : 4301 - 4309
  • [22] Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results
    Cantner, Friederike
    Cacaci, Claudio
    Muecke, Thomas
    Randelzhofer, Peter
    Hajto, Jan
    Beuer, Florian
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (12) : 4301 - 4309
  • [23] CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic implant-supported single crowns made from lithium disilicate: Final results of a 5-year prospective cohort study
    Spies, Benedikt Christopher
    Pieralli, Stefano
    Vach, Kirstin
    Kohal, Ralf-Joachim
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (05) : 876 - 883
  • [24] Survival and mechanical complications of single- and multiple-unit cement-retained posterior implant-supported restorations with custom CAD/CAM Atlantis titanium abutments: An up to 10-year retrospective analysis
    Di Francesco, Fabrizio
    Cristache, Corina Marilena
    Minervini, Giuseppe
    Cafferata, Emilio Alfredo
    Lanza, Alessandro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2023, 16 (04) : 315 - 324
  • [25] Clinical Outcomes of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns with CAD/CAM Technology. A 1-Year Follow-Up Prospective Clinical Study of 65 Patients
    Konstantinidis, Ioannis
    Trikka, Dimitra
    Gasparatos, Spyridon
    Mitsias, Miltiadis E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (11)
  • [26] Evaluation of zirconia-based posterior single crowns supported by zirconia implants: preliminary results of a prospective multicenter study
    Spies, Benedikt Christopher
    Kohal, Ralf-Joachim
    Balmer, Marc
    Vach, Kirstin
    Jung, Ronald E.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (05) : 613 - 619
  • [27] A 7.5-year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw-retained one-piece zirconia-based implant-supported single crowns
    Kraus, Riccardo D.
    Hjerppe, Jenni
    Naenni, Nadja
    Balmer, Marc
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [28] Monolithic Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network CAD/CAM Single Crowns: Three-Year Mid-Term Results of a Prospective Clinical Study
    Spitznagel, Frank A.
    Scholz, Konstantin J.
    Vach, Kristin
    Gierthmuehlen, Petra C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2020, 33 (02) : 160 - 168
  • [29] Cemented versus screw-retained posterior implant-supported single crowns: A 24-month randomized controlled clinical trial
    Wolfart, Stefan
    Rittich, Anne
    Gross, Karin
    Hartkamp, Oliver
    von der Stueck, Annabelle
    Raith, Stefan
    Reich, Sven
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (12) : 1484 - 1495
  • [30] Peri-implant marginal bone changes with implant-supported metal-ceramic or monolithic zirconia single crowns: A retrospective clinical study of 1 to 5 years
    Shen, Xiao-ting
    Li, Jia-ying
    Luo, Xin
    Feng, Yi
    Gai, Li-ting
    He, Fu-ming
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 128 (03): : 368 - 374