A collision prediction framework for noncoplanar radiotherapy planning and delivery

被引:8
|
作者
Islam, Naveed [1 ,2 ]
Kilian-Meneghin, Josh [1 ,2 ]
deBoer, Steven [1 ,2 ]
Podgorsak, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Roswell Park Canc Inst, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
来源
关键词
collision prediction; noncoplanar radiation therapy; patient safety; treatment planning; COUCH POSITION COMBINATIONS; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; INDICATOR CHARTS; AVOIDANCE; IMRT; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; COPLANAR; HEAD; ARC;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12920
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Noncoplanar radiotherapy can provide significant dosimetric benefits. However, clinical implementation of such techniques is not fully realized, partially due to the absence of a collision prediction tool integrated into the clinical workflow. In this work, the feasibility of developing a collision prediction system (CPS) suitable for integration into clinical practice has been investigated. Methods The CPS is based on a geometric model of the Linear Accelerator (Linac), and patient morphology acquired at the simulator using a combination of the planning CT scan and 3-D vision camera (Microsoft, Kinect) data. Physical dimensions of Linac components were taken to construct a geometric model. The Linac components include the treatment couch, gantry, and imaging devices. The treatment couch coordinates were determined based on a correspondence among the CT couch top, Linac couch, and the treatment isocenter location. A collision is predicted based on dot products between vectors denoting points in Linac components and patient morphology. Collision test cases were simulated with the CPS and experimentally verified using ArcCheck and Rando phantoms to simulate a patient. Results For 111 collision test cases, the sensitivity and specificity of the CPS model were calculated to be 0.95 and 1.00, respectively. The CPS predicted collision states that left conservative margins, as designed, relative to actual collision locations. The average difference between the predicted and measured collision states was 2.3 cm for lateral couch movements. The predicted couch rotational position for a collision between the gantry and a patient analog differed from actual values on average by 3.8 degrees. The magnitude of these differences is sufficient to account for interfractional patient positioning variations during treatment. Conclusion The feasibility of developing a CPS using geometric models and standard vector algebra has been investigated. This study outlines a framework for potential clinical implementation of a CPS for noncoplanar radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 106
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Collision-Free Path Planning and Delivery Sequence Optimization in Noncoplanar Radiation Therapy
    Ye, Beifa
    Tang, Qing
    Yao, Jin
    Gao, Wenxiang
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2019, 49 (01) : 42 - 55
  • [2] The development and verification of a highly accurate collision prediction model for automated noncoplanar plan delivery
    Yu, Victoria Y.
    Tran, Angelia
    Nguyen, Dan
    Cao, Minsong
    Ruan, Dan
    Low, Daniel A.
    Sheng, Ke
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (11) : 6457 - 6467
  • [3] Automated patient specific collision prevention: the future of noncoplanar SRS planning
    Mann, T.
    Thind, K.
    Ploquin, N.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S572 - S573
  • [5] An automated treatment planning strategy for highly noncoplanar radiotherapy arc trajectories
    Carrasqueira, P.
    Rocha, H.
    Dias, J. M.
    Ventura, T.
    Ferreira, B. C.
    Lopes, M. C.
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (01) : 206 - 223
  • [6] Selecting noncoplanar beam directions in a patient coordinate system for radiotherapy planning
    Niu, Chuanmeng
    Li, Minghui
    Yan, Hui
    Guo, Chenlei
    Dai, Jianrong
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2019, 44 (03) : 279 - 283
  • [7] A Novel Framework for An In-Room Collision Monitoring System During Radiotherapy Treatment Delivery
    Saleh, Z.
    Patrick, J.
    Schwer, M.
    Langner, U.
    Munbodh, R.
    Brindle, J.
    Wazer, D.
    Klein, E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E685 - E685
  • [8] Planning and delivery - Pediatric radiotherapy
    Olch, A
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 2120 - 2120
  • [9] Collision prediction software for radiotherapy treatments
    Padilla, Laura
    Pearson, Erik A.
    Pelizzari, Charles A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (11) : 6448 - 6456
  • [10] Cage-like radiotherapy system for noncoplanar radiotherapy
    Niu, Chuan-Meng
    Li, Ming-Hui
    Dai, Jian-Rong
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES, 2021, 32 (02)