Midsagittal Plane First: Building a Strong Facial Reference Frame for Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation

被引:5
|
作者
Grissom, Maggie K. [1 ]
Gateno, Jaime [2 ,3 ]
English, Jeryl D. [1 ]
Jacob, Helder B. [1 ]
Kuang, Tianshu [4 ]
Gonzalez, Carla E. [4 ]
Yuan, Peng [4 ]
Deng, Hannah H. [4 ]
Frick, Caleb J. [1 ]
Kim, Daeseung [4 ]
Hassan, Abdullahi [5 ]
Xia, James J. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Houston Methodist, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Houston, TX USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Clin Surg Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Houston Methodist Res Inst, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Houston, TX USA
[5] Houston Methodist Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 6560 Fannin St,Suite 1280, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Houston Methodist, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Houston, TX USA
[7] Houston Methodist, Surg Planning Lab, Houston, TX USA
[8] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Surg Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
NATURAL HEAD POSTURE; SURGERY; ASYMMETRY; ALGORITHM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2021.11.016
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: A facial reference frame is a 3-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system that includes 3 perpendicular planes: midsagittal, axial, and coronal. The order in which one defines the planes matters. The purposes of this study are to determine the following: 1) what sequence (axial-midsagittal-coronal vs midsagittal-axial-coronal) produced more appropriate reference frames and 2) whether orbital or auricular dystopia influenced the outcomes. Methods: This study is an ambispective cross-sectional study. Fifty-four subjects with facial asymmetry were included. The facial reference frames of each subject (outcome variable) were constructed using 2 methods (independent variable): axial plane first and midsagittal plane first. Two board-certified orthodontists together blindly evaluated the results using a 3-point categorical scale based on their careful inspection and expert intuition. The covariant for stratification was the existence of orbital or auricular dystopia. Finally, Wilcoxon signed rank tests were performed. Results: The facial reference frames defined by the midsagittal plane first method was statistically significantly different from ones defined by the axial plane first method (P = .001). Using the midsagittal plane first method, the reference frames were more appropriately defined in 22 (40.7%) subjects, equivalent in 26 (48.1%) and less appropriately defined in 6 (11.1%). After stratified by orbital or auricular dystopia, the results also showed that the reference frame computed using midsagittal plane first method was statistically significantly more appropriate in both subject groups regardless of the existence of orbital or auricular dystopia (27 with orbital or auricular dystopia and 27 without, both P < .05). Conclusions: The midsagittal plane first sequence improves the facial reference frames compared with the traditional axial plane first approach. However, regardless of the sequence used, clinicians need to judge the correctness of the reference frame before diagnosis or surgical planning (C) 2021 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 650
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [41] Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol. Part 1: planning sequence
    Xia, J. J.
    Gateno, J.
    Teichgraeber, J. F.
    Yuan, P.
    Chen, K. -C.
    Li, J.
    Zhang, X.
    Tang, Z.
    Alfi, D. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 44 (12) : 1431 - 1440
  • [42] Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation through Digital Dynamic 3D Skeletal Segments for Correcting Torsional Deformities of the Lower Limbs in Children with Cerebral Palsy
    Frizziero, Leonardo
    Trisolino, Giovanni
    Santi, Gian Maria
    Alessandri, Giulia
    Agazzani, Simone
    Liverani, Alfredo
    Menozzi, Grazia Chiara
    Di Gennaro, Giovanni Luigi
    Farella, Giuseppina Maria Grazia
    Abbruzzese, Alida
    Spinnato, Paolo
    Berti, Lisa
    Benedetti, Maria Grazia
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (15):
  • [43] Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation for Yaw Control of the Mandibular Condyle and Its Actual Application to Orthognathic Surgery: A One-Year Follow-Up Study
    Kim, Ju-Won
    Kim, Jong-Cheol
    Cheon, Kyeong-Jun
    Cho, Seoung-Won
    Kim, Young-Hee
    Yang, Byoung-Eun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (11)
  • [44] Geometrical model establishment and preoperative evaluation on A-T flap design: Finite element method-based computer-aided simulation on surgical operation processes
    Zhao, Yan
    Yang, Zonglin
    Chen, Lifen
    Peng, Yuhui
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [45] Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol. Part 2: three-dimensional cephalometry
    Xia, J. J.
    Gateno, J.
    Teichgraeber, J. F.
    Yuan, P.
    Li, J.
    Chen, K. -C.
    Jajoo, A.
    Nicol, M.
    Alfi, D. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 44 (12) : 1441 - 1450