Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Under Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty: Visual Rehabilitation and Graft Survival Rate

被引:58
|
作者
Anshu, Arundhati [1 ,2 ]
Price, Marianne O. [2 ]
Price, Francis W., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornea Res Fdn Amer, Indianapolis, IN 46260 USA
[2] Price Vis Grp, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; RISK-FACTORS; CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION; REJECTION; OUTCOMES; FAILURE; EYES; DONOR; COMPLICATIONS; IMPLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.032
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate graft survival, risk factors for failure, complications, and visual rehabilitation in patients who underwent Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) under a failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Design: Retrospective interventional case series. Participants: Sixty eyes (60 patients) treated at Price Vision Group, Indianapolis, Indiana. Methods: Graft diameters ranged from 8 to 9 mm and were similar to 1 mm larger than the previous PK. The Descemet's membrane was not stripped in the majority (54, 84%). The graft was inserted using forceps or a Busin funnel glide (Moria, Anthony, France). The probability of graft survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Graft survival, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications. Results: The mean recipient age was 68 years (range, 17-95 years). Forty eyes had 1 previous failed PK, 14 eyes had 2 previous failed PKs, and 6 eyes had 3 previous failed PKs. Thirty-one eyes (52%) had preexisting glaucoma, and 16 eyes (27%) had prior glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy in 4, shunt procedure in 12). Fifty-five grafts were performed for visual rehabilitation, and 5 grafts were performed for pain relief. Median follow-up was 2.3 years (range, 2 months to 6 years). Median preoperative BCVA was 1.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (range, 0.2-3, Snellen 20/340), and median postoperative visual improvement was 0.6 logMAR (6 lines), range -0.3 to +2.7. Four eyes had graft detachment (6.6%), 7 eyes (10.5%) had endothelial rejection, and 10 eyes (16.6%) had graft failure (primary failure in 2, secondary failure in 8). The overall secondary graft survival rates were 98%, 90%, 81%, and 74% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Prior glaucoma shunt was the principal risk factor for graft failure. The graft survival rates were 100%, 96%, 96%, and 96% in eyes without a prior shunt versus 93%, 74%, 44%, and 22% with a prior shunt at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively (P = 0.0005; relative risk = 20). Peripheral anterior synechiae (P = 0.14), neovascularization (P = 0.88), endothelial rejection (P = 0.59), and number of prior PKs (P = 0.13) were not independent risk factors for graft failure. Conclusions: Endothelial keratoplasty under a previous failed PK is a useful alternative to a repeat standard PK, particularly in eyes with an acceptable topography and refractive outcome before failure. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Ophthalmology 2011;118:2155-2160 (C) 2011 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:2155 / 2160
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outcomes of Repeat Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With Failed Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Kim, Peter
    Yeung, Sonia N.
    Lichtinger, Alejandro
    Amiran, Maoz D.
    Shanmugam, Shobha V.
    Iovieno, Alfonso
    Slomovic, Allan R.
    Rootman, David S.
    CORNEA, 2012, 31 (10) : 1154 - 1157
  • [42] DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY IN EYES WITH ENDOTHELIAL DECOMPENSATION AFTER PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY
    Beltz, Jacqueline
    Busin, Massimo
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 41 : 34 - 34
  • [43] Comment on: "Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty After Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty"
    Srirampur, Arjun
    Mansoori, Tarannum
    CORNEA, 2019, 38 (07) : E27 - E28
  • [44] Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: 10-Year Cell Loss and Failure Rate Compared With Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty
    Price, Marianne O.
    Kanapka, Lauren
    Kollman, Craig
    Lass, Jonathan H.
    Price, Francis W.
    CORNEA, 2024, 43 (11) : 1403 - 1409
  • [45] Cost-Effectiveness of Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Penetrating Keratoplasty
    Bose, Saideep
    Ang, Marcus
    Mehta, Jodhbir S.
    Tan, Donald T.
    Finkelstein, Eric
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 120 (03) : 464 - 470
  • [46] Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Droutsas, Konstantinos
    Petrelli, Myrsini
    Miltsakakis, Dimitrios
    Andreanos, Konstantinos
    Karagianni, Anastasia
    Lazaridis, Apostolos
    Koutsandrea, Chrysanthi
    Kymionis, George
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 2018
  • [47] Clinical Outcomes of Replacing a Failed Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft
    Bauer, Alex
    Potts, Luke
    Chen, Shin-Yi
    Tran, Khoa D.
    Straiko, Michael D.
    Terry, Mark A.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [48] Intraocular pressure after penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
    Moisseiev, Elad
    Varssano, David
    Rosenfeld, Elkanah
    Rachmiel, Rony
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2013, 48 (03): : 179 - 185
  • [49] Graft survival and endothelial outcomes after penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Ke
    Zhao, Yang
    Lu, Hongshuang
    Zang, Yunxiao
    Mao, Yu
    Hong, Jiaxu
    Jie, Ying
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2020, 20 (03) : 2794 - 2804
  • [50] Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty to Treat Graft Failure after Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Oh, Si Eun
    Ha, Min Ji
    Whang, Woong Joo
    Byun, Yong-Soo
    Hwang, Hyung Bin
    Na, Kyung Sun
    Rho, Chang Rae
    Lee, Hyun Soo
    Chung, So-Hyang
    Kim, Eun Chul
    Cho, Yang Kyung
    Kim, Hyun Seung
    Kim, Man Soo
    Hwang, Ho Sik
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 61 (12): : 1532 - 1537