Characterization of PM2.5 Mass in Relation to PM1.0 and PM10 in Megacity Seoul

被引:2
|
作者
Han, Jihyun [1 ,2 ]
Lim, Seahee [1 ]
Lee, Meehye [1 ]
Lee, Young Jae [1 ]
Lee, Gangwoong [3 ]
Shim, Changsub [4 ]
Chang, Lim-Seok [5 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Inst Technol, Div Climate & Environm Res, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Hankuk Univ Foreign Studies, Dept Environm Sci, Yongin, South Korea
[4] Korea Environm Inst, Div Atmospher Environm, Sejong, South Korea
[5] Natl Inst Environm Res, Environm Satellite Ctr, Incheon, South Korea
关键词
Seoul Mega City; PM2.5; PM1.0; PM10; Non-negative Matrix Factorization; POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; ASIAN DUST; CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS; PARTICULATE MATTER; ORGANIC-CARBON; AIR-QUALITY; ELEMENTAL CARBON; FINE PARTICLES; REGIONAL HAZE;
D O I
10.5572/ajae.2021.124
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examines the PM2.5 characteristics in Seoul in relation to those of PM1.0 and PM10. Samples were typically collected daily on filters and a few hours sampling were conducted during a few haze events (March 2007 to June 2008). Mean mass concentrations of PM1.0, PM2.5, and PM10 were 19.7 mu g/m(3), 26.0 mu g/m(3), and 48.2 mu g/m(3), respectively, and PM2.5 was reasonably correlated with PM1.0 (gamma=0.79) and PM10 (gamma=0.52). Three mass group types were mainly distinguished. Group 1 (31%): linear increase of PM1.0 with PM10 and high OC and NO3-; Group 2 (17%): PM10 considerably higher than PM1.0 and high Ca2+ and SO42-; Group 3 (52%): PM1.0 relatively more enhanced than PM10 and highest carbonaceous fraction against mass. The fine mode fraction was lowest (highest) in Group 2 (Group 3). Haze and dust episodes relating to Chinese outflows were mostly evident in Groups 1 and 2, respectively; average PM2.5 concentrations were visibly higher than in Group 3. Non-Negative Matrix Factorization analysis demonstrated that traffic-related urban primary (28%) and coal-fired industry (27%) emissions equally contributed to the PM2.5 mass, followed by aged urban secondary (19%), soil mineral (16%), and biomass combustion (10%) sources. Seasonal variations were apparent in air mass trajectories. Urban primary and coal-fired industry factors were predominant in Group 3 under stagnant conditions in the warm season and under a strong northerly wind in the cold season, respectively. However, contributions of the other three factors were higher in Groups 1 and 2. This study shows that the PM2.5 mass in Seoul is largely dependent on high concentration episodes occurring mostly in cold seasons. It also shows that local emissions contribute considerably during warm months, while the influence of Chinese outflow predominates during cold months.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Chemical characteristics and influence of continental outflow on PM1.0, PM2.5 and PM10 measured at Tuoji island in the Bohai Sea
    Zhang, Junmei
    Yang, Lingxiao
    Mellouki, Abdelwahid
    Wen, Liang
    Yang, Yumeng
    Gao, Ying
    Jiang, Pan
    Li, Yanyan
    Wang, Wenxing
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 573 : 699 - 706
  • [22] Preliminary analysis of variability in concentration of fine particulate matter - PM1.0, PM2.5 and PM10 in area of Poznan city
    Sowka, Izabela
    Chlebowska-Stys, Anna
    Mathews, Barbara
    X-TH SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE AIR PROTECTION IN THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 28
  • [23] The Characterization of PM, PM10, and PM2.5 from Stationary Sources
    Kim, JongHo
    Hwang, InJo
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN SOCIETY FOR ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 32 (06) : 603 - 612
  • [24] Indoor air quality modeling for PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 in naturally ventilated classrooms of an urban Indian school building
    Goyal, Radha
    Khare, Mukesh
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2011, 176 (1-4) : 501 - 516
  • [25] Acute respiratory response to individual particle exposure (PM1.0, PM2.5 and PM10) in the elderly with and without chronic respiratory diseases
    Chen, Tianyi
    Chen, Fei'er
    Wang, Kan
    Ma, Xuedong
    Wei, Xinping
    Wang, Weigang
    Huang, Pengyu
    Yang, Dong
    Xia, Zhaolin
    Zhao, Zhuohui
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2021, 271
  • [26] Can BSNE (Big Spring Number Eight) samplers be used to measure PM10, respirable dust, PM2.5 and PM1.0?
    Goossens, Dirk
    Buck, Brenda J.
    AEOLIAN RESEARCH, 2012, 5 : 43 - 49
  • [27] Indoor air quality modeling for PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 in naturally ventilated classrooms of an urban Indian school building
    Radha Goyal
    Mukesh Khare
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2011, 176 : 501 - 516
  • [28] 气流输送对乌鲁木齐市PM10、PM2.5和PM1.0质量浓度的影响
    韩茜
    魏文寿
    刘明哲
    洪雯
    陆恒
    张延伟
    中国沙漠, 2013, 33 (01) : 223 - 230
  • [29] Comparative receptor modeling study of PM10 and PM2.5 in Seoul, Korea
    Kim, YS
    Lee, JT
    Kim, H
    Cho, YS
    Lee, HS
    Kim, SY
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (04) : S235 - S235
  • [30] Concentration and Properties of Particulate Matters (PM10 and PM2.5) in the Seoul Metropolitan
    Lee, Tae-Jung
    Lim, Hyoji
    Kim, Shin-Do
    Park, Duck-Shin
    Kim, Dong-Sool
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN SOCIETY FOR ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 31 (02) : 164 - 172