Evaluation of laser absorption spectroscopic techniques for eddy covariance flux measurements of ammonia

被引:70
|
作者
Whitehead, James D. [1 ]
Twigg, Marsailidh [2 ]
Famulari, Daniela [2 ]
Nemitz, Eiko [2 ]
Sutton, Mark A. [2 ]
Gallagher, Martin W. [1 ]
Fowler, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Earth Atmospher & Environm Sci, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Bush Estate, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Penicuik EH26 0QB, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es071596u
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An intercomparison was made between eddy covariance flux measurements of ammonia by a quantum cascade laser absorption spectrometer (QCLAS) and a lead-salt tunable diode laser absorption spectrometer (TDLAS). The measurements took place in September 2004 and again in April 2005 over a managed grassland site in Southern Scotland, U.K. These were also compared with a flux estimate derived from an "Ammonia Measurement by ANnular Denuder with online Analysis" (AMANDA), using the aerodynamic gradient method (AGM). The concentration and flux measurements from the QCLAS correlated well with those of the TDLAS and the AGM systems when emissions were high, following slurry application to the field. Both the QCLAS and TDLAS, however, underestimated the flux when compared with the AMANDA system, by 64%. A flux loss of 41% due to chemical reaction of ammonia in the QCLAS (and 37% in the TDLAS) sample tube walls was identified and characterized using laboratory tests but did not fully account for this difference. Recognizing these uncertainties, the agreement between the systems was nevertheless very close (R-2 = 0.95 between the QCLAS and the TDLAS; R-2 = 0.84 between the QCLAS and the AMANDA) demonstrating the suitability of the laser absorption methods for quantifying the temporal dynamics of ammonia fluxes.
引用
收藏
页码:2041 / 2046
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Technical note: Laboratory evaluation of a tunable diode laser system for eddy covariance measurements of ammonia flux
    Brodeur, J. J.
    Warland, J. S.
    Staebler, R. M.
    Wagner-Riddle, C.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2009, 149 (02) : 385 - 391
  • [2] Eddy covariance carbonyl sulfide flux measurements with a quantum cascade laser absorption spectrometer
    Gerdel, Katharina
    Spielmann, Felix Maximilian
    Hammerle, Albin
    Wohlfahrt, Georg
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2017, 10 (09) : 3525 - 3537
  • [3] Accounting for spectroscopic effects in laser-based open-path eddy covariance flux measurements
    Burba, George
    Anderson, Tyler
    Komissarov, Anatoly
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2019, 25 (06) : 2189 - 2202
  • [4] Eddy covariance flux measurements of ammonia by high temperature chemical ionisation mass spectrometry
    Sintermann, J.
    Spirig, C.
    Jordan, A.
    Kuhn, U.
    Ammann, C.
    Neftel, A.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2011, 4 (03) : 599 - 616
  • [5] Field comparison of disjunct and conventional eddy covariance techniques for trace gas flux measurements
    Rinne, J.
    Douffet, T.
    Prigent, Y.
    Durand, P.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2008, 152 (03) : 630 - 635
  • [6] Modelling random uncertainty of eddy covariance flux measurements
    Domenico Vitale
    Massimo Bilancia
    Dario Papale
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2019, 33 : 725 - 746
  • [7] On Frequency Response Corrections for Eddy Covariance Flux Measurements
    T. W. Horst
    [J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2000, 94 : 517 - 520
  • [8] Modelling random uncertainty of eddy covariance flux measurements
    Vitale, Domenico
    Bilancia, Massimo
    Papale, Dario
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2019, 33 (03) : 725 - 746
  • [9] Random uncertainties of flux measurements by the eddy covariance technique
    Rannik, Ullar
    Peltola, Olli
    Mammarella, Ivan
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2016, 9 (10) : 5163 - 5181
  • [10] On frequency response corrections for eddy covariance flux measurements
    Horst, TW
    [J]. BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2000, 94 (03) : 517 - 520