Modelling random uncertainty of eddy covariance flux measurements

被引:6
|
作者
Vitale, Domenico [1 ]
Bilancia, Massimo [2 ]
Papale, Dario [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tuscia, Dept Innovat Biol Agrofood & Forest Syst DIBAF, Via San Camillo Lellis, I-01100 Viterbo, Italy
[2] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Ionian Dept Law Econ & Environm, Via Lago Maggiore Angolo,Via Ancona, I-74121 Taranto, Italy
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Eddy covariance; Net ecosystem exchange; Global warming; Uncertainty; Conditional heteroskedasticity; Time series; Ecology; NET ECOSYSTEM EXCHANGE; CARBON-DIOXIDE EXCHANGE; LONG-TERM MEASUREMENTS; MISSING DATA; CO2; FLUX; MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; BAYESIAN-INFERENCE; SEMIARID WOODLAND; FOREST; WATER;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-019-01664-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The eddy-covariance (EC) technique is considered the most direct and reliable method to calculate flux exchanges of the main greenhouse gases over natural ecosystems and agricultural fields. The resulting measurements are extremely important to characterize ecosystem exchanges of carbon, water, energy and other trace gases, and are widely used to validate or constrain parameter of land surface models via data assimilation techniques. For this purpose, the availability of both complete half-hourly flux time series and its associated uncertainty is mandatory. However, uncertainty estimation for EC data is challenging because the standard procedures based on repeated sampling are not suitable for this kind of measurements, and the presence of missing data makes it difficult to build any sensible time series model with time-varying second-order moments that can provide estimates of total random uncertainty. To overcome such limitations, this paper describes a new method in the context of the strategy based on the model residual approach proposed by Richardson et al. (Agric For Meteorol 148(1): 38-50, 2008). The proposed approach consists in (1) estimating the conditional mean process as representative of the true signal underlying observed data and (2) estimating the conditional variance process as representative of the total random uncertainty affecting EC data. The conditional mean process is estimated through the multiple imputation algorithm recently proposed by Vitale et al. (J Environ Inform https,:il doi .org/10.3808/jei.201800391, 2018). The conditional variance process is estimated through the stochastic volatility model introduced by Beltratti and Morana (Econ Notes 30(2): 205-234, 2001). This strategy is applied to ten sites that are part of FLUXNET2015 dataset, selected in such a way to cover various ecosystem types under different climatic regimes around the world. The estimated uncertainty is compared with estimates by other well-established methods, and it is demonstrated that the scaling relationship between uncertainty and flux magnitude is preserved. Additionally, the proposed strategy allows obtaining a complete half-hourly time series of uncertainty estimates, which are expected to be useful for many users of EC flux data.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 746
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modelling random uncertainty of eddy covariance flux measurements
    Domenico Vitale
    Massimo Bilancia
    Dario Papale
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2019, 33 : 725 - 746
  • [2] Random uncertainties of flux measurements by the eddy covariance technique
    Rannik, Ullar
    Peltola, Olli
    Mammarella, Ivan
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2016, 9 (10) : 5163 - 5181
  • [3] Uncertainty due to hygrometer sensor in eddy covariance latent heat flux measurements
    Martinez-Cob, Antonio
    Suvocarev, Kosana
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2015, 200 : 92 - 96
  • [4] Uncertainty of eddy covariance flux measurements over an urban area based on two towers
    Jarvi, Leena
    Rannik, Ullar
    Kokkonen, Tom, V
    Kurppa, Mona
    Karppinen, Ari
    Kouznetsov, Rostislav D.
    Rantala, Pekka
    Vesala, Timo
    Wood, Curtis R.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2018, 11 (10) : 5421 - 5438
  • [5] Uncertainty of annual net ecosystem productivity estimated using eddy covariance flux measurements
    Dragoni, D.
    Schmid, H. P.
    Grimmond, C. S. B.
    Loescher, H. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2007, 112 (D17)
  • [6] On Frequency Response Corrections for Eddy Covariance Flux Measurements
    T. W. Horst
    [J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2000, 94 : 517 - 520
  • [7] On frequency response corrections for eddy covariance flux measurements
    Horst, TW
    [J]. BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2000, 94 (03) : 517 - 520
  • [8] Methane flux measurements in rice by static flux chamber and eddy covariance
    Reba, Michele L.
    Fong, Bryant N.
    Rijal, Ishara
    Adviento-Borbe, M. Arlene
    Chiu, Yin-Lin
    Massey, Joseph H.
    [J]. AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 3 (01)
  • [9] Sources of uncertainty in eddy covariance ozone flux measurements made by dry chemiluminescence fast response analysers
    Muller, J. B. A.
    Percival, C. J.
    Gallagher, M. W.
    Fowler, D.
    Coyle, M.
    Nemitz, E.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2010, 3 (01) : 163 - 176
  • [10] The fundamental equation of eddy covariance and its application in flux measurements
    Gu, Lianhong
    Massman, William J.
    Leuning, Ray
    Pallardy, Stephen G.
    Meyers, Tilden
    Hanson, Paul J.
    Riggs, Jeffery S.
    Hosman, Kevin P.
    Yang, Bai
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2012, 152 : 135 - 148