Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments

被引:191
|
作者
Fagerlin, A
Ditto, PH
Danks, JH
Houts, RM
Smucker, WD
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Psychol & Social Behav, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Kent State Univ, Dept Psychol, Kent, OH 44242 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Ctr Dev Sci, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Summa Hlth Syst, Dept Family Practice, Akron, OH USA
关键词
advance directives; projection; end-of-life decision making;
D O I
10.1037/0278-6133.20.3.166
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
To honor the wishes of an incapacitated patient, surrogate decision makers must predict the treatment decisions patients would make for themselves if able. Social psychological research, however, suggests that surrogates' own treatment preferences may influence their predictions of others' preferences. In 2 studies (1 involving 60 college student surrogates and a parent, the other involving 361 elderly outpatients and their chosen surrogate decision maker), surrogates predicted whether a close other would want life-sustaining treatment in hypothetical end-of-life scenarios and stated their own treatment preferences in the same scenarios. Surrogate predictions more closely resembled surrogates' own treatment wishes than they did the wishes of the individual they were trying to predict. Although the majority of prediction errors reflected inaccurate use of surrogates' own treatment preferences, projection was also found to result in accurate prediction more often than counterprojective predictions. The rationality and accuracy of projection in surrogate decision making is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 175
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors Affecting Neurosurgeons' Decisions to Forgo Life-Sustaining Treatments After Traumatic Brain Injury
    Bozkurt, Ismail
    Umana, Giuseppe E.
    Deora, Harsh
    Wellington, Jack
    Karakoc, Ebru
    Chaurasia, Bipin
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 159 : E311 - E323
  • [42] Physicians' experience in decisions of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments: A multicenter survey into emergency departments
    Douplat, Marion
    Jacquin, Laurent
    Tazarourte, Karim
    Michelet, Pierre
    Le Coz, Pierre
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2018, 37 (06) : 633 - 634
  • [43] Patient race and decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments for seriously ill hospitalized adults
    Phillips, RS
    Hamel, MB
    Teno, JM
    Soukup, J
    Lynn, J
    Califf, R
    Vidaillet, H
    Davis, RB
    Bellamy, P
    Goldman, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 108 (01): : 14 - 19
  • [44] Decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment and the duty of documentation
    Melltorp, G
    Nilstun, T
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 22 (10) : 1015 - 1019
  • [45] FACTORS AFFECTING FAMILIES' PERCEPTION ABOUT THE PROCESS OF DECISION TO FORGO LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENTS
    Chang, Hou-Tai
    Chen, Duan-Rung
    Tsai, Fu-Chang
    [J]. RESPIROLOGY, 2018, 23 : 263 - 263
  • [46] RESPONSIBILITIES OF CRITICAL CARE PROFESSIONALS IN SETTING MEDICAL POLICIES FOR FOREGOING LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENTS
    SPRUNG, CL
    RAPHAELY, RC
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1990, 18 (07) : 787 - 787
  • [47] Physicians' decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment
    Farber, NJ
    Simpson, P
    Salam, T
    Collier, VU
    Weiner, J
    Boyer, EG
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 166 (05) : 560 - 564
  • [48] DECISIONS TO FORGO LIFE-SUSTAINING THERAPY - THE LIMITS OF ETHICS
    CASSEL, CK
    [J]. SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 1987, 61 (04) : 552 - 564
  • [49] Decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatment - A moral algorithm
    Pellegrino, ED
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (08): : 1065 - 1067
  • [50] Withdrawal of life-sustaining medical devices at the end of life
    Beattie, James M.
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2013, 3 (01) : 9 - +