A systematic review and meta-analysis on placebo response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression trials

被引:97
|
作者
Razza, Lais B. [1 ,2 ]
Moffa, Adriano H. [1 ,2 ]
Moreno, Marina L. [1 ,2 ]
Carvalho, Andre F. [3 ,4 ]
Padberg, Frank [5 ]
Fregni, Felipe [6 ,7 ]
Brunoni, Andre R. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP, Fac Med, Serv Interdisciplinary Neuromodulat,Lab Neurosci, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP, Fac Med, Natl Inst Biomarkers Neuropsychiat INBioN,Dept &, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Ceara, Translat Psychiat Res Grp, Fac Med, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Ceara, Dept Clin Med, Fac Med, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[5] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Munich, Germany
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Spaulding Neuromodulat Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Placebo response; Major depressive disorder; Meta-analysis; Repetitive magnetic stimulation; Intervention; MEDICATION-RESISTANT DEPRESSION; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; LEFT PREFRONTAL CORTEX; SHAM-CONTROLLED TRIAL; ADD-ON TREATMENT; DOUBLE-BLIND; MAJOR DEPRESSION; LOW-FREQUENCY; CLINICAL-TRIAL; RTMS TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.10.016
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although several studies indicate that placebo response is large to antidepressant pharmacotherapy in major depressive disorder (MDD), no updated meta-analysis has quantified the magnitude of the placebo (sham) response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in MDD yet. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on this issue in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving participants with MDD; and to explore potential moderators. Methodology: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science electronic databases were searched from inception up to March 15, 2017 for RCTs that investigated the efficacy of any rTMS modality compared to sham intervention in participants with acute depressive episodes. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to estimate risks. We estimated the placebo effect size (Hedges's g, random-effects model) response using placebo groups baseline and endpoint depressive symptom scores. Meta-regressions have been employed to explore potential moderators of response. Results: Sixty-one studies met eligibility criteria (N = 1328; mean age, 47 years; 57% females). Placebo response was large (g = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.65-0.95, p < 0.01) regardless of the modality of intervention. Placebo response was directly associated with publication year and depression improvement of the active group, and inversely associated with higher levels of treatment-resistant depression. Other moderators, including gender, age, and stimulator type, were not associated with the outcome. Overall, 24.6%, 67.2%, and 8.2% of studies had an overall low, unclear, and high bias risk, respectively. Conclusion: Placebo response in rTMS depression trials was large and associated with depression improvement of the active treatment group. Such result suggests that excluding placebo responders with a run-in phase may not confer advantage since response to 'active' rTMS may decrease as well. Moreover, placebo response may be a component of therapeutic response to rTMS in MDD. In addition, placebo response increase over time could indicate improvement in rTMS trial designs, including better sham rTMS methods.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 113
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of depression -: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Martin, JLR
    Barbanoj, MJ
    Schlaepfer, TE
    Thompson, E
    Pérez, V
    Kulisevsky, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 182 : 480 - 491
  • [2] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for peripartum depression: systematic review & meta-analysis
    Lee, Hyune June
    Kim, Sung Min
    Kwon, Ji Yean
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [3] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for peripartum depression: systematic review & meta-analysis
    Hyune June Lee
    Sung Min Kim
    Ji Yean Kwon
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [4] Durability of antidepressant response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Senova, Suhan
    Cotovio, Goncalo
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Oliveira-Maia, Albino J.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (01) : 119 - 128
  • [5] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as Treatment of Poststroke Depression A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shen, Yiting
    Cai, Zhengyun
    Liu, Furong
    Zhang, Zhihui
    Ni, Guangxia
    [J]. NEUROLOGIST, 2022, 27 (04) : 177 - 182
  • [6] Placebo Response in Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Trials of Treatment of Auditory Hallucinations in Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis
    Dollfus, Sonia
    Lecardeur, Laurent
    Morello, Remy
    Etard, Olivier
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2016, 42 (02) : 301 - 308
  • [7] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for bipolar depression: a systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis
    Kishi, Taro
    Ikuta, Toshikazu
    Sakuma, Kenji
    Hatano, Masakazu
    Matsuda, Yuki
    Kito, Shinsuke
    Iwata, Nakao
    [J]. MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 29 (01) : 39 - 42
  • [8] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Knijnik, Leonardo M.
    Dussan-Sarria, Jairo A.
    Rozisky, Joanna R.
    Torres, Iraci L. S.
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Fregni, Felipe
    Caumo, Wolnei
    [J]. PAIN PRACTICE, 2016, 16 (03) : 294 - 304
  • [9] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for mania: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kishi, Taro
    Sakuma, Kenji
    Matsuda, Yuki
    Kito, Shinsuke
    Iwata, Nakao
    [J]. BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2023, 25 (02) : 160 - 161
  • [10] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gaynes, Bradley N.
    Lloyd, Stacey W.
    Lux, Linda
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    Hansen, Richard A.
    Brode, Shannon
    Jonas, Daniel E.
    Evans, Tammeka Swinson
    Viswanathan, Meera
    Lohr, Kathleen N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 75 (05) : 477 - U196