Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:234
|
作者
Gaynes, Bradley N. [1 ,2 ]
Lloyd, Stacey W. [4 ]
Lux, Linda [4 ]
Gartlehner, Gerald [4 ,5 ]
Hansen, Richard A. [6 ]
Brode, Shannon [2 ]
Jonas, Daniel E. [2 ,3 ]
Evans, Tammeka Swinson [4 ]
Viswanathan, Meera [4 ]
Lohr, Kathleen N. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychiat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Cecil G Sheps Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] RTI Int, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[5] Danube Univ, Krems, Austria
[6] Auburn Univ, Harrison Sch Pharm, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
SHAM-CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESISTANT/REFRACTORY MAJOR DEPRESSION; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; COMORBIDITY SURVEY REPLICATION; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; STAR-ASTERISK-D; DOUBLE-BLIND; RTMS TREATMENT; LOW-FREQUENCY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL;
D O I
10.4088/JCP.13r08815
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 2 or more prior antidepressant treatment failures (often referred to as treatment-resistant depression [TRD]). These patients are less likely to recover with medications alone and often consider nonpharmacologic treatments such as rTMS. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts for studies comparing rTMS with a sham-controlled treatment in TRD patients ages 18 years or older. Study Selection: We included 18 good-or fair-quality TRD studies published from January 1, 1980, through March 20, 2013. Data Extraction: We abstracted relevant data, assessed each study's internal validity, and graded strength of evidence for change in depressive severity, response rates, and remission rates. Results: rTMS was beneficial compared with sham for all outcomes. rTMS produced a greater decrease in depressive severity (high strength of evidence), averaging a clinically meaningful decrease on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) of more than 4 points compared with sham (mean decrease = -4.53; 95% CI, -6.11 to -2.96). rTMS resulted in greater response rates (high strength of evidence); those receiving rTMS were more than 3 times as likely to respond as patients receiving sham (relative risk = 3.38; 95% CI, 2.24 to 5.10). Finally, rTMS was more likely to produce remission (moderate strength of evidence); patients receiving rTMS were more than 5 times as likely to achieve remission as those receiving sham (relative risk = 5.07; 95% CI, 2.50 to 10.30). Limited evidence and variable treatment parameters prevented conclusions about which specific treatment options are more effective than others. How long these benefits persist remains unclear. Conclusions: For MDD patients with 2 or more antidepressant treatment failures, rTMS is a reasonable, effective consideration. (C) Copyright 2014 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / U196
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Y. Q.
    Zhu, D.
    Zhou, X. Y.
    Liu, Y. Y.
    Qin, B.
    Ren, G. P.
    Xie, P.
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 48 (03) : 198 - 206
  • [2] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review and metaanalysis
    Lam, Raymond W.
    Chan, Peter
    Wilkins-Ho, Michael
    Yatham, Lakshmi N.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2008, 53 (09): : 621 - 631
  • [3] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of depression -: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Martin, JLR
    Barbanoj, MJ
    Schlaepfer, TE
    Thompson, E
    Pérez, V
    Kulisevsky, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 182 : 480 - 491
  • [4] The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Suicidal Ideation in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Meta-Analysis
    Mehta, Shobha
    Konstantinou, Gerasimos
    Weissman, Cory R.
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    Voineskos, Daphne
    Downar, Jonathan
    Mulsant, Benoit H.
    Blumberger, Daniel M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 83 (02)
  • [5] Efficacy and tolerability of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hung, Yu-Yung
    Yang, Li-Heng
    Stubbs, Bredon
    Li, Dian-Jeng
    Tseng, Ping-Tao
    Yeh, Ta-Chuan
    Chen, Tien-Yu
    Liang, Chih-Sung
    Chu, Che-Sheng
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 99
  • [6] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for peripartum depression: systematic review & meta-analysis
    Lee, Hyune June
    Kim, Sung Min
    Kwon, Ji Yean
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [7] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for peripartum depression: systematic review & meta-analysis
    Hyune June Lee
    Sung Min Kim
    Ji Yean Kwon
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [8] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for preventing relapse in antidepressant treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Matsuda, Yuki
    Sakuma, Kenji
    Kishi, Taro
    Esaki, Kosei
    Kito, Shinsuke
    Shigeta, Masahiro
    Iwata, Nakao
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2023, 16 (02) : 458 - 461
  • [9] A review of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for adolescents with treatment-resistant depression
    Magavi, Leela R.
    Reti, Irving M.
    Vasa, Roma A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 29 (02) : 79 - 88
  • [10] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression
    Stern, Adam Philip
    Cohen, Daniel
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2013, 3 (01) : 107 - 115