Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:234
|
作者
Gaynes, Bradley N. [1 ,2 ]
Lloyd, Stacey W. [4 ]
Lux, Linda [4 ]
Gartlehner, Gerald [4 ,5 ]
Hansen, Richard A. [6 ]
Brode, Shannon [2 ]
Jonas, Daniel E. [2 ,3 ]
Evans, Tammeka Swinson [4 ]
Viswanathan, Meera [4 ]
Lohr, Kathleen N. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychiat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Cecil G Sheps Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] RTI Int, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[5] Danube Univ, Krems, Austria
[6] Auburn Univ, Harrison Sch Pharm, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
SHAM-CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESISTANT/REFRACTORY MAJOR DEPRESSION; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; COMORBIDITY SURVEY REPLICATION; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; STAR-ASTERISK-D; DOUBLE-BLIND; RTMS TREATMENT; LOW-FREQUENCY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL;
D O I
10.4088/JCP.13r08815
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 2 or more prior antidepressant treatment failures (often referred to as treatment-resistant depression [TRD]). These patients are less likely to recover with medications alone and often consider nonpharmacologic treatments such as rTMS. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts for studies comparing rTMS with a sham-controlled treatment in TRD patients ages 18 years or older. Study Selection: We included 18 good-or fair-quality TRD studies published from January 1, 1980, through March 20, 2013. Data Extraction: We abstracted relevant data, assessed each study's internal validity, and graded strength of evidence for change in depressive severity, response rates, and remission rates. Results: rTMS was beneficial compared with sham for all outcomes. rTMS produced a greater decrease in depressive severity (high strength of evidence), averaging a clinically meaningful decrease on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) of more than 4 points compared with sham (mean decrease = -4.53; 95% CI, -6.11 to -2.96). rTMS resulted in greater response rates (high strength of evidence); those receiving rTMS were more than 3 times as likely to respond as patients receiving sham (relative risk = 3.38; 95% CI, 2.24 to 5.10). Finally, rTMS was more likely to produce remission (moderate strength of evidence); patients receiving rTMS were more than 5 times as likely to achieve remission as those receiving sham (relative risk = 5.07; 95% CI, 2.50 to 10.30). Limited evidence and variable treatment parameters prevented conclusions about which specific treatment options are more effective than others. How long these benefits persist remains unclear. Conclusions: For MDD patients with 2 or more antidepressant treatment failures, rTMS is a reasonable, effective consideration. (C) Copyright 2014 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / U196
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ren, Juanjuan
    Li, Hui
    Palaniyappan, Lena
    Liu, Hongmei
    Wang, Jijun
    Li, Chunbo
    Rossini, Paolo Maria
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 51 : 181 - 189
  • [32] Optimal parameter determination of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating treatment-resistant depression: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li, Jinbiao
    Cui, Liqian
    Li, Hao
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [33] Unilateral and bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials over 2 decades
    Sehatzadeh, Shayan
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    Yap, Belinda
    Hong-Anh Tu
    Palimaka, Stefan
    Bowen, James M.
    O'Reilly, Daria J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 44 (03): : 151 - 163
  • [34] The association of total pulses with the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression: A dose-response meta-analysis
    Yu, Chia-Ling
    Kao, Yu-Chen
    Thompson, Trevor
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Hsu, Chih-Wei
    Carvalho, Andre F.
    Chu, Che -Sheng
    Tseng, Ping -Tao
    Tu, Yu-Kang
    Yang, Fu-Chi
    Su, Kuan-Pin
    Cheng, Shu-Li
    Hsu, Tien-Wei
    Liang, Chih-Sung
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 92
  • [35] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on chronic tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhengrong Liang
    Haidi Yang
    Gui Cheng
    Lingfei Huang
    Tao Zhang
    Haiying Jia
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 20
  • [36] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on chronic tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Zhengrong
    Yang, Haidi
    Cheng, Gui
    Huang, Lingfei
    Zhang, Tao
    Jia, Haiying
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [37] The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on empathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, C. -C.
    Khalifa, N.
    Vollm, B.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 48 (05) : 737 - 750
  • [38] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Sun, Pingping
    Fang, Lei
    Zhang, Jianzhong
    Liu, Yang
    Wang, Guodong
    Qi, Rui
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (03) : 499 - 514
  • [39] The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Nianyi
    He, Yu
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Zou, Wenchen
    Liu, Xueyong
    [J]. SLEEP MEDICINE, 2021, 77 : 226 - 237
  • [40] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Fibromyalgia: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Toh, Ezekiel Y. J.
    Ng, Jarret S. P.
    McIntyre, Roger S.
    Tran, Bach X.
    Ho, Roger C.
    Ho, Cyrus S. H.
    Tam, Wilson W. S.
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2022, 84 (04) : 400 - 409