Factors driving refinery CO2 intensity, with allocation into products

被引:36
|
作者
Bredeson, Larry [2 ]
Quiceno-Gonzalez, Raul [1 ]
Riera-Palou, Xavier [1 ]
Harrison, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Shell Global Solut, Shell Technol Ctr, Chester CH1 3SH, Cheshire, England
[2] Shell Global Solut USA, Westhollow Technol Ctr, Houston, TX 77082 USA
来源
关键词
CO2 allocation methods; Carbon footprint; Crude oil refining CO2 emissions; Diesel production; Energy-consuming products; Gasoline production; H-2 effects on refinery CO2; Life cycle assessment; Refining emissions; PETROLEUM; EMISSIONS; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-010-0204-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Attempts to develop adequate allocation methods for CO2 emissions from petroleum products have been reported in the literature. The common features in those studies are the use of energy, mass, and/or market prices as parameters to allocate the emissions to individual products. The crude barrel is changing, as are refinery complexities and the severity of conversion to gasoline or diesel leading to changes in the emissions intensity of refining. This paper estimates the consequences for CO2 emissions at refineries of allowing these parameters to vary. A detailed model of a typical refinery was used to determine CO2 emissions as a function of key operational parameters. Once that functionality was determined, an allocation scheme was developed which calculated CO2 intensity of the various products consistent with the actual refinery CO2 functionality. The results reveal that the most important factor driving the refinery energy requirement is the H-2 content of the products in relation to the H-2 content of the crude. Refinery energy use is increased either by heavier crude or by increasing the conversion of residual products into transportation fuels. It was observed that the total refinery emissions did not change as refinery shifted from gasoline to diesel production. The energy allocation method fails to properly allocate the refinery emissions associated with H-2 production. It can be concluded that the reformer from a refinery energy and CO2 emissions standpoint is an energy/CO2-equalizing device, shifting energy/CO2 from gasoline into distillates. A modified allocation method is proposed, including a hydrogen transfer term, which would give results consistent with the refinery behavior. The results indicate that the refinery CO2 emissions are not affected by the ratio of gasoline to distillate production. The most important factors driving the CO2 emissions are the refinery configuration (crude heaviness and residual upgrading) which link to the refinery H-2 requirement. Using the H-2-energy equivalent allocation proposed in this study provides a more reliable method to correctly allocate CO2 emissions to products in a refinery in a transparent way, which follows the ISO recommendations of cause-effect and physical relationship between emissions and products. Regulatory activity should recognize that there is no functional relationship between refinery CO2 emissions and the production ratio of gasoline, jet, and diesel, and adopt a methodology which more accurately mirrors actual refinery behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 826
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors driving refinery CO2 intensity, with allocation into products
    Larry Bredeson
    Raul Quiceno-Gonzalez
    Xavier Riera-Palou
    Andrew Harrison
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2010, 15 : 817 - 826
  • [2] Factors driving refinery CO2 intensity, with allocation into products: comment
    Nejad, Alireza Tehrani M.
    Saint-Antonin, Valerie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (01): : 24 - 28
  • [3] Factors driving refinery CO2 intensity, with allocation into products: comment
    Alireza Tehrani Nejad M.
    Valérie Saint-Antonin
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 : 24 - 28
  • [4] Allocation of the CO2 and pollutant emissions of a refinery to petroleum finished products
    Babusiaux, D
    [J]. OIL & GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE D IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES, 2003, 58 (06): : 685 - 692
  • [5] Economics and the refinery's CO2 emissions allocation problem
    Pierru, A.
    [J]. OIL & GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE D IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES, 2007, 62 (05): : 647 - 652
  • [6] Driving forces of CO2 emissions and energy intensity in Colombia
    Patino, Lourdes Isabel
    Alcantara, Vicent
    Padilla, Emilio
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 151
  • [7] Driving factors of aggregate CO2 emissions in China
    Wang, Qunwei
    Chiu, Ching-Ren
    Chiu, Yung-Ho
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, ICAE2014, 2014, 61 : 1327 - 1330
  • [8] Estimating the CO2 intensities of EU refinery products: Statistical Regression Methodology
    Valdenaire, Damien
    Tehrani, Alireza
    Mennecier, Serge
    [J]. CONCAWE Reports, 2022, 22 (15): : 1 - 61
  • [9] Barriers and Driving Factors for Sustainable Development of CO2 Valorisation
    Terjanika, Viktorija
    Pubule, Jelena
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [10] Estimation of US refinery water consumption and allocation to refinery products
    Sun, Pingping
    Elgowainy, Amgad
    Wang, Michael
    Han, Jeongwoo
    Henderson, Robert J.
    [J]. FUEL, 2018, 221 : 542 - 557