Comparative study of three types of microbial fuel cell

被引:192
|
作者
Ieropoulos, IA [1 ]
Greenman, J
Melhuish, C
Hart, J
机构
[1] Univ W England, CEMS Fac, IAS Lab, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
[2] Univ W England, Fac Sci Appl, Sch Human & Analyt Sci, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
关键词
microbial fuel cells; dye mediators; sulphide; anodophillic bacteria; redox potential;
D O I
10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.03.006
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Three different generations (Gen-I, -II and -III) of microbial fuel cell (MFC), distinguished by their historical development and mechanisms of electron transfer, were compared. Gen-I utilised synthetic redox mediators combined with Escherichia coli. In contrast, the Gen-II exemplar utilised the natural mediating properties of sulphate/sulphide with the sulphate reducing species Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Gen-III MFCs were based on the anodophillic species Geobacter sulfurreducens and required no soluble mediator. Each type of MFC was operated under similar environmental conditions. In terms of substrate to power conversion efficiency, Gen-II was most efficient (64.52%), followed by Gen-III (47.38%) and Gen-I (28.12%). When output was expressed as power/unit of cells, Gen-III was 28-fold higher by comparison (33.72 x 10(15) e/mu g cells). For comparative purposes, these results were produced using equal rather than optimal circuit loads. Under optimal loading conditions, Gen-III produced on average five-fold higher power than under equal load and the conversion efficiency was 95%. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first time that these three types of MFC have been experimentally compared under similar conditions. Gen-II and -III but not Gen-I may be used advantageously in wastewater treatment and power generation from organic matter. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 245
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative study of fuel types on solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine hybrid system for electric propulsion aircraft
    Liu, He
    Qin, Jiang
    Xiu, Xinyan
    Ha, Chan
    Dong, Peng
    FUEL, 2023, 347
  • [32] Comparative study between synthetic and dairy wastewaters in single chamber microbial fuel cell for power generation
    Choudhury, Payel
    Majumdar, Ria
    Bandyopadhyaya, Tarun Kanti
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCHEMICAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 11 (04): : 279 - 289
  • [33] Comparative study on power generation of dual-cathode microbial fuel cell according to polarization methods
    Lee, Kang-yu
    Ryu, Wyan-seuk
    Cho, Sung-il
    Lim, Kyeong-ho
    WATER RESEARCH, 2015, 84 : 43 - 48
  • [34] Comparative study on the metabolic behaviour of anode biofilm in microbial fuel cell under different external resistance
    Mersinkova, Yana
    Yemendzhiev, Hyusein
    Nenov, Valentin
    BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT, 2022, 36 (01) : 141 - 146
  • [35] Comparative study of three types of mesenchymal stem cell to differentiate into pancreatic β-like cells in vitro
    Mo, Yunfang
    Wang, Zejian
    Gao, Jian
    Yan, Yan
    Ren, Huaijuan
    Zhang, Fengli
    Qi, Nianmin
    Chen, Yantian
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (03)
  • [36] Additive Manufacturing of a Microbial Fuel Cell—A detailed study
    Flaviana Calignano
    Tonia Tommasi
    Diego Manfredi
    Alessandro Chiolerio
    Scientific Reports, 5
  • [37] Study on Microbial Fuel Cell with Piggery Sewage as Substrate
    Li, Jinsheng
    Yang, Liquan
    Li, Song
    Liu, Chunhui
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEW ENERGY AND RENEWABLE RESOURCES (ICNERR 2015), 2015, : 310 - 317
  • [38] Experimental study of the microbial fuel cell internal resistance
    Pei-Yuan, Zhang
    Zhong-Liang, Liu
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2010, 195 (24) : 8013 - 8018
  • [39] Comparative study of different fuel cell technologies
    Mekhilef, S.
    Saidur, R.
    Safari, A.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (01): : 981 - 989
  • [40] Comparative study of different fuel cell technologies
    Alvarado-Flores, J.
    BOLETIN DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE CERAMICA Y VIDRIO, 2013, 52 (03): : 105 - 117