Change in Loneliness After Intervention With Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids

被引:47
|
作者
Contrera, Kevin J. [1 ]
Sung, Yoon K. [7 ]
Betz, Joshua [2 ]
Li, Lingsheng [8 ]
Lin, Frank R. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Ctr Aging & Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Geriatr Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Mental Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Drexel Univ, Coll Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[8] Univ Oklahoma, Coll Med, Oklahoma City, OK 73190 USA
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE | 2017年 / 127卷 / 08期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Loneliness; mental health; hearing impairment; hearing aid; cochlear implant; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SOCIAL-ISOLATION; LOSS PREVALENCE; OLDER-ADULTS; IMPAIRMENT; HEALTH; IMPACT; RELIABILITY; ASSOCIATION; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/lary.26424
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the impact of hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implant (CI) use on loneliness in adults. Study Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Methods: One hundred and thirteen adults, aged > 50 years, with postlingual hearing loss and receiving routine clinical care at a tertiary academic medical center, were evaluated with the University of California at Los Angeles Loneliness Scale before and 6 and 12 months after intervention with HAs or CIs. Change in score was assessed using linear mixed effect models adjusted for age; gender; education; and history of hypertension, diabetes, and smoking. Results: Significant improvements in loneliness scores were observed in CI users from baseline to 6 months (-3.79 [95% confidence interval): -5.73, -1.85], P <.001) and baseline to 12 months (-3.26 [95% confidence interval: -5.66, -0.87], P = .007). We did not observe a significant improvement in loneliness scores in HA users from baseline to 6 months (-0.83 [95% confidence interval: -2.68, 1.02], P = .381) or baseline to 12 months (-0.34 [ 95% confidence interval: -2.77, -2.10], P = .007). The most substantial increases were observed in individuals with the lowest baseline scores. Conclusion: Treatment of hearing loss with CIs results in a significant reduction in loneliness symptoms. This improvement was not observed with HAs. We observed differential effects of treatment depending on the baseline loneliness score, with the greatest improvements observed in individuals with the most loneliness symptoms at baseline.
引用
收藏
页码:1885 / 1889
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quality of life in bimodal hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aids)
    A. Farinetti
    S. Roman
    J. Mancini
    K. Baumstarck-Barrau
    R. Meller
    J. P. Lavieille
    J. M. Triglia
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2015, 272 : 3209 - 3215
  • [32] Quality of life in bimodal hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aids)
    Farinetti, A.
    Roman, S.
    Mancini, J.
    Baumstarck-Barrau, K.
    Meller, R.
    Lavieille, J. P.
    Triglia, J. M.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 272 (11) : 3209 - 3215
  • [33] The cognition and behaviour of children with cochlear implants, children with hearing aids and their hearing peers: A comparison
    Khan, S
    Edwards, L
    Langdon, D
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2005, 10 (02) : 117 - 126
  • [34] Management of the child with sensorineural hearing loss - Medical, surgical, hearing aids, cochlear implants
    Brookhouser, PE
    Beauchaine, KL
    Osberger, MJ
    PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 46 (01) : 121 - +
  • [35] Virtual Reality pitch ranking in children with cochlear implants, hearing aids or normal hearing
    Kepp, Nille Elise
    Arrieta, Irene
    Schioth, Christina
    Percy-Smith, Lone
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 161
  • [36] Visual attention in children with normal hearing, children with hearing aids, and children with cochlear implants
    Tharpe, AM
    Ashmead, DH
    Rothpletz, AM
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2002, 45 (02): : 403 - 413
  • [37] Plasticity of tonotopic maps in humans: influence of hearing loss, hearing aids and cochlear implants
    Thai-Van, Hung
    Veuillet, Evelyne
    Norena, Arnaud
    Guiraud, Jeanne
    Collet, Lionel
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2010, 130 (03) : 333 - 337
  • [38] SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY OF CHILDREN WITH COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, TACTILE AIDS, OR HEARING-AIDS
    OSBERGER, MJ
    MASO, M
    SAM, LK
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1993, 36 (01): : 186 - 203
  • [39] Reading and Spelling Abilities of Deaf Adolescents With Cochlear Implants and Hearing Aids
    Harris, Margaret
    Terlektsi, Emmanouela
    JOURNAL OF DEAF STUDIES AND DEAF EDUCATION, 2011, 16 (01): : 24 - 34
  • [40] Listening to Music Through Hearing Aids: Potential Lessons for Cochlear Implants
    Moore, Brian C. J.
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2022, 26