Air quality modeling for accountability research: Operational, dynamic, and diagnostic evaluation

被引:27
|
作者
Henneman, Lucas R. F. [1 ]
Liu, Cong [2 ]
Hu, Yongtao [1 ]
Mulholland, James A. [1 ]
Russell, Armistead G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Energy & Environm, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Air pollution accountability; Model evaluation; Chemical transport modeling; SECONDARY POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS; DIRECT SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; SOUTHEASTERN UNITED-STATES; PARTICULATE MATTER; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; EMISSION REDUCTIONS; ERROR APPORTIONMENT; SPATIAL VARIATIONS; SURFACE OZONE; URBAN AREAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.049
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Photochemical grid models play a central role in air quality regulatory frameworks, including in air pollution accountability research, which seeks to demonstrate the extent to which regulations causally impacted emissions, air quality, and public health. There is a need, however, to develop and demonstrate appropriate practices for model application and evaluation in an accountability framework. We employ a combination of traditional and novel evaluation techniques to assess four years (2001-02, 2011-12) of simulated pollutant concentrations across a decade of major emissions reductions using the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. We have grouped our assessments in three categories: Operational evaluation investigates how well CMAQ captures absolute concentrations; dynamic evaluation investigates how well CMAQ captures changes in concentrations across the decade of changing emissions; diagnostic evaluation investigates how CMAQ attributes variability in concentrations and sensitivities to emissions between meteorology and emissions, and how well this attribution compares to empirical statistical models. In this application, CMAQ captures O-3 and PM2.5 concentrations and change over the decade in the Eastern United States similarly to past CMAQ applications and in line with model evaluation guidance; however, some PM2.5 species-EC, OC, and sulfate in particular-exhibit high biases in various months. CMAQ-simulated PM2.5 has a high bias in winter months and low bias in the summer, mainly due to a high bias in OC during the cold months and low bias in OC and sulfate during the summer. Simulated O-3 and PM2.5 changes across the decade have normalized mean bias of less than 2.5% and 17%, respectively. Detailed comparisons suggest biased EC emissions, negative wintertime SOi-sensitivities to mobile source emissions, and incomplete capture of OC chemistry in the summer and winter. Photochemical grid model simulated 03 and PM2.5 responses to emissions and meteorologically across the decade match results from receptor-based, statistical regression models. PM2.5 sensitivities to mobile source emissions in the summertime have decreased substantially, but wintertime mobile sensitives remain largely unchanged because decreases in negative SOi- sensitivities match decreases in positive sensitivities from other constituents. Similarly, NOx emissions have led to decreased summertime O-3 and increased wintertime O-3 because of opposite sensitivities. Overall, results show that emissions reductions improved air quality across the domain and remain a viable option for improving future air quality. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 565
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling Dynamic Spatial Influence for Air Quality Prediction with Atmospheric Prior
    Lu, Dan
    Wu, Le
    Chen, Rui
    Han, Qilong
    Wang, Yichen
    Ge, Yong
    WEB AND BIG DATA, APWEB-WAIM 2021, PT II, 2021, 12859 : 384 - 398
  • [32] Comparing prognostic and diagnostic meteorological fields and their impacts on photochemical air quality modeling
    Kumar, N
    Russell, AG
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 30 (12) : 1989 - 2010
  • [33] Measuring public health accountability of air quality management
    Hwashin Hyun Shin
    Richard T. Burnett
    David M. Stieb
    Barry Jessiman
    Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2009, 2 : 11 - 20
  • [34] Comparing prognostic and diagnostic meteorological fields and their impacts on photochemical air quality modeling
    Kumar, Naresh
    Russell, Armistead G.
    Atmospheric Environment, 1996, 30 (12 pt 2): : 1989 - 2010
  • [35] Measuring public health accountability of air quality management
    Shin, Hwashin Hyun
    Burnett, Richard T.
    Stieb, David M.
    Jessiman, Barry
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2009, 2 (01): : 11 - 20
  • [36] Diagnostic evaluation of numerical air quality models with specialized ambient observations: testing the Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system (CMAQ) at selected SOS 95 ground sites
    Arnold, JR
    Dennis, RL
    Tonnesen, GS
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (9-10) : 1185 - 1198
  • [37] OPERATIONAL AIR-QUALITY MODELING SYSTEM FOR PHOTO-CHEMICAL SMOG IN SAN-DIEGO AIR BASIN
    SKLAREW, RC
    JONCICH, MA
    TRAN, KT
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1978, 59 (09) : 1238 - 1238
  • [38] Research on Air Quality Evaluation based on Principal Component Analysis
    Wang, Xing
    Wang, Zilin
    Guo, Min
    Chen, Wei
    Zhang, Huan
    2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MATERIAL APPLICATION (ESMA2017), VOLS 1-4, 2018, 108
  • [39] Operational Availability Modeling and Simulation Evaluation
    Song, Tailiang
    Bai, Xianzhen
    Wang, Qinqin
    Xing, Liudong
    2012 PROCEEDINGS - ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS), 2012,
  • [40] Consortium for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation
    Peter Airasian
    Sandra Horn
    Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1998, 11 (4): : 381 - 383