A Comparison of Cyclosporine 0.05% Ophthalmic Emulsion Versus Vehicle in Chinese Patients with Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Disease: An Eight-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Trial

被引:43
|
作者
Chen, Minjie [1 ]
Gong, Lan [1 ]
Sun, Xinghuai [1 ]
Xie, Hanping [2 ]
Zhang, Yueqin [3 ]
Zou, Liuhe [4 ]
Qu, Jia [5 ]
Li, Yumin [6 ]
He, Jia [7 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Eye & ENT Hosp, Shanghai 200031, Peoples R China
[2] Third Mil Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Henan Eye Ctr, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tongren Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Wenzhou Med Coll, Sch Ophthalmol & Optometry, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[7] Second Mil Med Univ, Hlth Stat Dept, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
FLOW-CYTOMETRIC ANALYSIS; KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS SICCA; SJOGRENS-SYNDROME; CONJUNCTIVAL EPITHELIUM; INFLAMMATORY MARKERS; SHIHPAI EYE; TEAR FLUID; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1089/jop.2009.0145
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The goals of this study were to compare the efficacy and safety profile of topical cyclosporine 0.05% versus vehicle in Chinese patients with moderate to severe dry eye disease. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study, 233 dry eye patients were allocated to receive either cyclosporine 0.05% or vehicle twice daily for 8 weeks. Primary outcome was the difference between groups, in total score of 4 symptoms and 4 signs change from baseline at weeks 2, 4, and 8. Changes in symptoms (ocular dryness, foreign body sensation, photophobia and burning) and signs (conjunctival hyperemia, Schirmer test, tear Break-up time (BUT), and corneal punctate fluorescein staining) at weeks 2, 4, and 8 as well as frequency of administration of concomitant artificial tears, were considered as secondary outcomes. The safety profile was evaluated by examining adverse events, changes in visual acuity, and ocular tolerance. Results: Greater improvements of the total score were seen in cyclosporine 0.05% group than in the vehicle group at all follow-up times (P<0.01). Improvements in ocular dryness at week 8 (P=0.040) and foreign body sensation during weeks 4 and 8 (P<0.020) were significantly greater with cyclosporine. In addition, compared with the vehicle, cyclosporine significantly improved 2 objective dry eye disease signs: corneal staining at weeks 4 (P=0.025) and 8 (P=0.050) and the Schirmer test at week 4 (P=0.035). However, no between-group difference approached statistical significance in photophobia, burning, BUT value, conjunctival hyperemia and frequency of administration of concomitant artificial tears at any follow-up times (P>0.05). The cumulative frequency of adverse events did not significantly differ between the groups (P=0.519), which were 11.21% and 8.55%, respectively. There were no patients who experienced reduced visual acuity. Conclusion: Cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion is an effective and safe treatment for Chinese patients with moderate to severe dry eye disease.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 366
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Results of a multicenter, 8-week, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine maleate versus amlodipine besylate in Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension
    Park, S
    Chung, N
    Kwon, J
    Yoon, JH
    Kim, YJ
    Han, DS
    Kim, HS
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 27 (04) : 441 - 450
  • [32] EFFICACY, PHARMACOKINETICS, SAFETY AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF THE BIOSIMILAR HS016 IN COMPARISON WITH ADALIMUMAB IN CHINESE PATIENTS WITH ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS: A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PARALLEL-GROUP, PHASE 3 TRIAL
    Su, Jinmei
    Li Mengtao
    Zeng, Xiaofeng
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2019, 78 : 894 - 894
  • [33] A comparison of an atypical and typical antipsychotic, zotepine versus haloperidol in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia: A parallel-group double-blind trial
    Petit, M
    Raniwalla, J
    Tweed, J
    Leutenegger, E
    Dollfus, S
    Kelly, F
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY BULLETIN, 1996, 32 (01) : 81 - 87
  • [34] A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus placebo for controlling the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and rhinoconjunctivitis
    Abelson, MB
    Turner, D
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 25 (03) : 931 - 947
  • [35] A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Tocilizumab Subcutaneous Versus Placebo in Combination with Traditional Dmards in Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (BREVACTA).
    Kivitz, Alan J.
    Olech, Ewa
    Borofsky, Michael A.
    Zazueta, Beatriz M.
    Navarro-Sarabia, Federico
    Rowell, Lucy
    Nasmyth-Miller, Clare
    Pope, Janet E.
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2012, 64 (12): : 4170 - 4170
  • [36] Single-Pill Combination of Telmisartan/Amlodipine Versus Amlodipine Monotherapy in Diabetic Hypertensive Patients: An 8-Week Randomized, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind Trial
    Sharma, Arya M.
    Bakris, George
    Neutel, Joel M.
    Littlejohn, Thomas W.
    Kobe, Maureen
    Ting, Naitee
    Ley, Ludwin
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 34 (03) : 537 - 551
  • [37] A twelve-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, noninferiority trial of the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of imidapril and candesartan in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension:: The Iberian Multicenter Imidapril Study on Hypertension (IMISH)
    Palma Gamiz, Jose Luis
    Pego, Mariano
    Marquez Contreras, Emilio
    Pujol Anglada, Montserrat
    Olivan Martinez, Josefina
    Alegria Esquerra, Eduardo
    Sagastagoitia Gorostiza, Jose Domingo
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 28 (12) : 2040 - 2051
  • [38] Combination therapy with liraglutide and insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A 36-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial
    Seino, Yutaka
    Kaneko, Shizuka
    Fukuda, Shuichi
    Osonoi, Takeshi
    Shiraiwa, Toshihiko
    Nishijima, Keiji
    Bosch-Traberg, Heidrun
    Kaku, Kohei
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2016, 7 (04) : 565 - 573
  • [39] Results of a phase III, 8-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial to assess the effects of amlodipine camsylate versus amlodipine besylate in Korean adults with mild to moderate hypertension
    Kim, Sang-Hyun
    Kim, Young-Dae
    Lim, Do-Sun
    Yoon, Myeong-Ho
    Ahn, Young-Keun
    On, Young-Keun
    Lee, Je-Won
    Kim, In-Jae
    Park, Jung-Bae
    Kim, Jae-Joong
    Chung, Wook-Sung
    Yang, Ju-Young
    Seo, Hong-Seok
    Shin, Eak-Kyun
    Kim, Hyo-Soo
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 29 (09) : 1924 - 1936
  • [40] A 36-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 clinical trial of sodium oligomannate for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia
    Xiao, Shifu
    Chan, Piu
    Wang, Tao
    Hong, Zhen
    Wang, Shuzhen
    Kuang, Weihong
    He, Jincai
    Pan, Xiaoping
    Zhou, Yuying
    Ji, Yong
    Wang, Luning
    Cheng, Yan
    Peng, Ying
    Ye, Qinyong
    Wang, Xiaoping
    Wu, Yuncheng
    Qu, Qiumin
    Chen, Shengdi
    Li, Shuhua
    Chen, Wei
    Xu, Jun
    Peng, Dantao
    Zhao, Zhongxin
    Li, Yansheng
    Zhang, Junjian
    Du, Yifeng
    Chen, Weixian
    Fan, Dongsheng
    Yan, Yong
    Liu, Xiaowei
    Zhang, Wei
    Luo, Benyan
    Wu, Wenyuan
    Shen, Lu
    Liu, Chunfeng
    Mao, Peixian
    Wang, Qiumei
    Zhao, Qianhua
    Guo, Qihao
    Zhou, Yongtao
    Li, Yi
    Jiang, Lijun
    Ren, Wenwei
    Ouyang, Yingjun
    Wang, Yan
    Liu, Shuai
    Jia, Jianjun
    Zhang, Nan
    Liu, Zhonglin
    He, Raoli
    ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2021, 13 (01)