Drivers for innovation in waste-to-energy technology

被引:54
|
作者
Gohlke, Oliver [1 ]
Martin, Johannes [1 ]
机构
[1] Martin GmbH Umwelt & Energietech, D-80807 Munich, Germany
关键词
waste-to-energy; innovation; energy efficiency; ash quality; eco-efficiency; cost-benefit; wmr; 1181-9;
D O I
10.1177/0734242X07079146
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper summarizes developments made in the field of waste-to-energy technology between the 1980s and the present. In the USA, many waste-to-energy systems were developed in the 1980s and early 1990s. These plants generated power relatively efficiently (typically 23%) in 60 bar/443 degrees C boilers. Unfortunately, the development came to a stop when the US Supreme Court rejected the practice of waste flow control in 1994. Consequently, waste was directed to mega-landfills, associated with very negative environmental impacts. However, given landfill taxes and increased fuel prices, new waste-to-energy projects have recently been developed. Attractive premiums for renewable power production from municipal waste have been introduced in several European countries. This triggered important innovations in the field of improved energy recovery. Examples of modern waste-to-energy plants are Brescia and Amsterdam with net efficiencies of 24 and 30%, respectively. Incineration is traditionally preferred in Japan due to space constraints. New legislation promoted ash melting or gasification to obtain improved ash quality. However, these processes reduce the efficiency in terms of energy, cost and availability. A new oxygen-enriched waste-to-energy system is tinder development in order to better achieve the required inert ash quality.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 219
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Waste Management in Greece and Potential for Waste-to-Energy
    Kalogirou, Efstratios
    Bourtsalas, Athanasios
    Klados, Manolis
    Themelis, Nickolas J.
    Green Energy and Technology, 2012, 55 : 219 - 235
  • [42] Renewable Waste-to-Energy in Southeast Asia: Status, Challenges, Opportunities, and Selection of Waste-to-Energy Technologies
    Tun, Maw Maw
    Palacky, Petr
    Juchelkova, Dagmar
    Sitar, Vladislav
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (20): : 1 - 28
  • [43] WASTE-TO-ENERGY AND THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT HIERARCHY
    O'Brien, Jeremy K.
    16TH ANNUAL NORTH AMERICAN WASTER TO ENERGY CONFERENCE NAWTEC16, 2008, : 199 - 203
  • [44] The Zero Waste utopia and the role of waste-to-energy
    Quicker, Peter
    Consonni, Stefano
    Grosso, Mario
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2020, 38 (05) : 481 - 484
  • [45] Sensor Technology Options for Municipal Solid Waste Characterization for Optimal Operation of Waste-to-Energy Plants
    Muri, Harald Ian D. I.
    Hjelme, Dag Roar
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (03)
  • [46] The crucial role of Waste-to-Energy technologies in enhanced landfill mining: a technology review
    Bosmans, A.
    Vanderreydt, I.
    Geysen, D.
    Helsen, L.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 55 : 10 - 23
  • [47] Waste-to-energy in Europe and technology highlights from Von Roll Inova projects
    Brunner, Martin
    Sigg, Alfred
    NAWTEC 15: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH ANNUAL NORTH AMERICAN WASTE TO ENERGY CONFERENCE, 2007, : 19 - 28
  • [48] Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions and energy recovery from municipal and industrial solid waste using waste-to-energy technology
    Chen, Ying-Chu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 192 : 262 - 269
  • [49] Combining anaerobic digestion and waste-to-energy
    Ostrem, KM
    Millrath, K
    Themelis, NJ
    NAWTEC12: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH ANNUAL NORTH AMERICAN WASTE TO ENERGY CONFERENCE, 2004, : 265 - 271
  • [50] Integrating waste-to-energy in Copenhagen, Denmark
    Hulgaard, Tore
    Sondergaard, Inger
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 171 (05) : 3 - 10