Drivers for innovation in waste-to-energy technology

被引:54
|
作者
Gohlke, Oliver [1 ]
Martin, Johannes [1 ]
机构
[1] Martin GmbH Umwelt & Energietech, D-80807 Munich, Germany
关键词
waste-to-energy; innovation; energy efficiency; ash quality; eco-efficiency; cost-benefit; wmr; 1181-9;
D O I
10.1177/0734242X07079146
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper summarizes developments made in the field of waste-to-energy technology between the 1980s and the present. In the USA, many waste-to-energy systems were developed in the 1980s and early 1990s. These plants generated power relatively efficiently (typically 23%) in 60 bar/443 degrees C boilers. Unfortunately, the development came to a stop when the US Supreme Court rejected the practice of waste flow control in 1994. Consequently, waste was directed to mega-landfills, associated with very negative environmental impacts. However, given landfill taxes and increased fuel prices, new waste-to-energy projects have recently been developed. Attractive premiums for renewable power production from municipal waste have been introduced in several European countries. This triggered important innovations in the field of improved energy recovery. Examples of modern waste-to-energy plants are Brescia and Amsterdam with net efficiencies of 24 and 30%, respectively. Incineration is traditionally preferred in Japan due to space constraints. New legislation promoted ash melting or gasification to obtain improved ash quality. However, these processes reduce the efficiency in terms of energy, cost and availability. A new oxygen-enriched waste-to-energy system is tinder development in order to better achieve the required inert ash quality.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 219
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] REVIEW OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY.
    Reilly, Thomas C.
    Public Works, 1986, 117 (05): : 76 - 79
  • [2] Review on the suitability of waste for appropriate waste-to-energy technology
    Maisarah M.
    Bong C.P.C.
    Ho W.S.
    Lim J.S.
    Muis Z.
    Hashim H.
    Elagroudy S.
    Ling G.H.T.
    Ho C.S.
    Ho, Wai Shin (hwshin@utm.my), 2018, Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC (63): : 187 - 192
  • [3] WASTE-TO-ENERGY - WASTE-TO-ENERGY PLANT EXPANDS
    HODSON, CO
    POLLUTION ENGINEERING, 1995, 27 (12) : 14 - 14
  • [4] Wasting energy or energizing waste? The public acceptance of waste-to-energy technology
    Caferra, Rocco
    D'Adamo, Idiano
    Morone, Piergiuseppe
    ENERGY, 2023, 263
  • [5] Examining waste-to-energy technology potential through the pilot project of Bantargebang Waste-to-Energy Power Plant
    Agatha, Natasya Putri
    Harvan, Akhmad Audi
    Prasetya, Fierza Rizky
    7TH ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, ETMC 2023, 2024, 485
  • [6] Waste-to-energy
    World Wastes, 1992, 35 (06):
  • [7] WASTE-TO-ENERGY
    PORTER, T
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1986, 93 (12) : 5 - 5
  • [8] Waste-to-Energy Technology Options Increase but Remain Underutilized
    Rosinski, Stan
    POWER, 2012, 156 (04) : 30 - +
  • [9] Innovation in the Malaysian Waste-to-Energy Sector: Applications with Global Potential
    Sovacool B.K.
    Drupady I.M.
    Electricity Journal, 2011, 24 (05): : 29 - 41
  • [10] A new resource: The waste-to-energy research and technology council
    Themelis, NJ
    NAWTEC11: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH ANNUAL NORTH AMERICAN WASTE TO ENERGY CONFERENCE, 2003, : 253 - 262