Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States

被引:65
|
作者
Stem, Judy E.
Cedars, Marcelle I.
Jain, Tarun
Klein, Nancy A.
Beaird, C. Martin
Grainger, David A.
Gibbons, William E.
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[4] Old Post Rd Grp LLC, New York, NY USA
[5] Ctr Reprod Med, Wichita, KS USA
[6] Womans Ctr Reprod Med, Baton Rouge, LA USA
关键词
ART; IVF; multiple pregnancy; SART-ASRM guidelines; success rate;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.09.016
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: [1] To evaluate trends in number of embryos transferred and resultant high-order multiple (HOM) pregnancy rates by Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART)-member clinics between 1996 and 2003 and [2] to relate these practice patterns and outcomes to clinic compliance with SART-American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) embryo transfer guidelines. Design: Retrospective. Setting: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology-member fertility centers in the United States. Patient(s): Five hundred thirty-six thousand, five hundred twenty-four fresh, nondonor IVF cycles. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Number of embryos transferred; pregnancy rates; implantation rates; and proportion of singleton, twin, and HOM pregnancies. Result(s): The number of embryos transferred declined each year. High-order multiple pregnancy rates also declined, whereas the twin rates remained stable. The most pronounced declines in number transferred occurred immediately after publication of SART-ASRM embryo transfer guidelines. After stratifying clinics according to mean and modal number of embryos transferred, clinics transferring the fewest embryos in women <35 years of age had the highest mean implantation and pregnancy rates. Furthermore, the percentage of clinics transferring two embryos to a majority of women <35 years of age increased from 3.3% in 1996 to 49.9% in 2003. Conclusion(S): The implementation of SART-ASRM embryo transfer guidelines is associated with significant reductions in the number of embryos being transferred, along with reductions of HOM pregnancies. Initiatives to further reduce twin pregnancies and encourage singleton gestation outcomes are outlined.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 282
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assisted reproductive technology and embryo preservation
    RonEl, R
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (01) : 10 - 10
  • [32] Lessons across the pond: Assisted reproductive technology in the United Kingdom and the United States
    Ouellette, A
    Caplan, A
    Carroll, K
    Fossett, JW
    Bjarnadottir, D
    Shickle, D
    McGee, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE, 2005, 31 (04) : 419 - 446
  • [33] Assessing the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States by non-United States residents
    Levine, Aaron D.
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Berry, Roberta M.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Alberta-Sherer, Hillary B.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (05) : 815 - 821
  • [34] Economic implications of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology embryo transfer guidelines: healthcare dollars saved by reducing iatrogenic triplets
    Lee, Malinda S.
    Evans, Brady T.
    Stern, Ariel D.
    Hornstein, Mark D.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (01) : 189 - +
  • [35] High rates of embryo wastage with use of assisted reproductive technology: a look at the trends between 1995 and 2001 in the United States
    Kovalevsky, G
    Patrizio, P
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 (02) : 325 - 330
  • [36] Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
    Glujovsky, Demian
    Blake, Debbie
    Farquhar, Cindy
    Bardach, Ariel
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (07):
  • [37] Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
    Glujovsky, Demin
    Farquhar, Cindy
    Quinteiro Retamar, Andrea Marta
    Alvarez Sedo, Cristian Roberto
    Blake, Deborah
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (06):
  • [38] Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States†
    Reefhuis, J.
    Honein, M. A.
    Schieve, L. A.
    Correa, A.
    Hobbs, C. A.
    Rasmussen, S. A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2009, 24 (02) : 360 - 366
  • [39] Survey assessing obesity policies for assisted reproductive technology in the United States
    Kaye, Leah
    Sueldo, Carolina
    Engmann, Lawrence
    Nulsen, John
    Benadiva, Claudio
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 105 (03) : 703 - +
  • [40] Safety of Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States, 2000-2011
    Kawwass, Jennifer F.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Kulkarni, Aniket D.
    Creanga, Andreea A.
    Session, Donna R.
    Callaghan, William M.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (01): : 88 - 90