Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation

被引:141
|
作者
Taipale, P
Hiilesmaa, V
机构
[1] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Jorvi Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, SF-02740 Espoo, Finland
[3] Univ Trondheim Hosp, Natl Ctr Fetal Med, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, FIN-00290 Helsinki, Finland
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2001年 / 97卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01131-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare last menstrual period and ultrasonography in predicting delivery date. Methods: We used ultrasound to scan 17,221 nonselected singleton pregnancies at 8-16 completed weeks. The last menstrual period (LMP) was considered certain in 13,541 and uncertain in 3680 cases. The duration of pregnancy from the scan to the day of spontaneous delivery was predicted by crown-rump length, biparietal diameter (BPD), and femur length (FL) using linear regression models, and the results were compared with estimates based on LMP. Results: At all gestational ages, ultrasound was superior to certain LMP in predicting the day of delivery by at least 1.7 days. When deliveries before 37 weeks were excluded, crown-rump length measurement of 15-60 mm (corresponding to 8-12.5 weeks) had the lowest prediction error of 7.3 days. After that time, BPD (at least 21 mm) showed a similar error (7.3 days) and was more precise than crown-rump length. Femur length was slightly less accurate than crown-rump length or BPD. Regression models using a combination of any two or three ultrasonic variables did not improve accuracy of prediction. When ultrasound was used instead of certain LMP, the number of postterm pregnancies decreased from 10.3% to 2.7% (P < .001). Conclusion: Ultrasound was more accurate than LMP in dating, and when it was used the number of postterm pregnancies decreased. Crown-rump length of 15-60 mm was superior to BPD, but then BPD (at least 21 mm) was more precise. Combining more than one ultrasonic measurements did not improve dating accuracy. (Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:189-94. (C) 2001 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 194
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Last menstrual period estimation techniques compared to physician recorded last menstrual period dates in the general practice research database
    Devine, Scott T.
    Hammad, Tarek A.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2008, 17 : S228 - S228
  • [42] What is the optimal strategy to date a twin gestation by ultrasound?
    DeYoung, Tracey H.
    Stortz, Sharon K.
    Wren, Garrett M.
    Spitzer, Trimble L.
    Lutgendorf, Monica A.
    Thagard, Andrew S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S263 - S263
  • [43] Fetal growth restriction: does dating by ultrasound versus last menstrual period change the antepartum diagnosis?
    Moncada, Kea Alexa
    Beckerman, Karen
    Chacko, Jerel
    Izard, Stephanie
    Chiuzan, Codruta
    Fruhman, Gary
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S510 - S510
  • [44] PREDICTION OF DELIVERY DATE BY ULTRASOUND CEPHALOMETRY
    VARMA, TR
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY OF THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH, 1973, 80 (04): : 316 - 319
  • [45] Dating gestational age by last menstrual period, symphysis-fundal height, and ultrasound in urban Pakistan
    Jehan, Imtiaz
    Zaidi, Shahida
    Rizvi, Sameera
    Mobeen, Naushaba
    McClure, Elizabeth M.
    Munoz, Breda
    Pasha, Omrana
    Wright, Linda L.
    Goldenberg, Robert L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2010, 110 (03) : 231 - 234
  • [47] CYCLIC VARIATIONS IN DATE OF LAST MENSTRUAL PERIOD OF MOTHERS OF INFANTS WITH CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS IN SOUTH-WALES, 1964-66
    ROBERTS, CJ
    LLOYD, S
    LOWE, CR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE & SOCIAL MEDICINE, 1972, 26 (04): : 212 - +
  • [48] Development and Validation of ICD-10-CM-based Algorithms for Date of Last Menstrual Period, Pregnancy Outcomes, and Infant Outcomes
    Chomistek, Andrea K.
    Phiri, Kelesitse
    Doherty, Michael C.
    Calderbank, Jenna F.
    Chiuve, Stephanie E.
    McIlroy, Brenda Hinman
    Snabes, Michael C.
    Enger, Cheryl
    Seeger, John D.
    DRUG SAFETY, 2023, 46 (02) : 209 - 222
  • [49] Development and Validation of ICD-10-CM-based Algorithms for Date of Last Menstrual Period, Pregnancy Outcomes, and Infant Outcomes
    Andrea K. Chomistek
    Kelesitse Phiri
    Michael C. Doherty
    Jenna F. Calderbank
    Stephanie E. Chiuve
    Brenda Hinman McIlroy
    Michael C. Snabes
    Cheryl Enger
    John D. Seeger
    Drug Safety, 2023, 46 : 209 - 222
  • [50] Correction to: Development and Validation of ICD‑10‑CM‑based Algorithms for Date of Last Menstrual Period, Pregnancy Outcomes, and Infant Outcomes
    Andrea K. Chomistek
    Kelesitse Phiri
    Michael C. Doherty
    Jenna F. Calderbank
    Stephanie E. Chiuve
    Brenda Hinman McIlroy
    Michael C. Snabes
    Cheryl Enger
    John D. Seeger
    Drug Safety, 2023, 46 : 515 - 515