Valuing users' willingness to pay for improved water quality in the context of the water framework directive

被引:12
|
作者
Lazaridou, D. [1 ]
Michailidis, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Forestry & Nat Environm, Lab Forest Econ, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Agr, Lab Agr Extens & Rural Sociol, Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
Willingness to pay; Economic valuation; Irrigation water pricing; Water Framework Directive; Zero responses; CONTINGENT VALUATION EXPERIMENTS; NONMARKET BENEFITS; ECONOMIC VALUATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; WELFARE EVALUATIONS; PUBLIC PREFERENCES; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; RIVER;
D O I
10.1080/13504509.2020.1719545
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Water Framework Directive (WFD) explicitly acknowledges the role of economics in the process of achieving the water quality targets it sets. At the same time, stakeholder participation in water resources management is emphasized in the Directive. In this paper, we examine farmers' willingness-to-pay (WTP) for ecological status improvement at a river basin scale. Based on a Contingent Valuation survey aims first to estimate the value farmers place on water quality improvement as it is envisaged by the WFD. Then through the use of different econometric models it was attempted to address zero responses and to find a robust estimate for the mean WTP. In a sample of more than 300 respondents, we found that 64.57% of them expressed zero responses. Further findings indicate that the mean values irrigators are willing to pay, for reaching the water quality targets set by the Directive, range between 11.5euro/ha and 22.0euro/ha (on an annual basis). Through the present research, farmers' willingness-to-pay for improvements in water quality directly investigated for the first time in Greece. Therefore, the results are provided can be useful for central decision makers.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 434
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The European Water framework directive: Water quality classification and implications to engineering planning
    Achleitner, S
    De Toffol, S
    Engelhard, C
    Rauch, W
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 35 (04) : 517 - 525
  • [42] The Water Framework Directive requires new tools for a better water quality monitoring
    Philippe, Namour
    Pascal, Breil
    Yohann, Clément
    Gil, De Sousa
    Jean-Pierre, Chanet
    Pierre, Lanteri
    [J]. E-Water, 2012,
  • [43] INTEGRATED INDICES FOR SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT QUALITY, ACCORDING TO WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE
    Teodorof, L.
    Burada, A.
    Despina, C.
    Seceleanu-Odor, D.
    Tudor, A. I. -M.
    Ibram, O.
    Navodaru, I.
    Tudor, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2016, 17 (01): : 42 - 52
  • [45] Willingness to pay for increasing river water quality in Aksu River, Turkey
    Emine Ikıkat Tumer
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, 22 : 6495 - 6503
  • [46] Willingness to pay for water quality improvements: The case of precision application technology
    Hite, D
    Hudson, D
    Intarapapong, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2002, 27 (02) : 433 - 449
  • [47] Willingness to pay for water: The international debates
    Rogerson, CM
    [J]. WATER SA, 1996, 22 (04) : 373 - 380
  • [48] Willingness to pay for increasing river water quality in Aksu River, Turkey
    Tumer, Emine Ikikat
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 22 (07) : 6495 - 6503
  • [49] Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden
    Carlsson, F
    Johansson-Stenman, O
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2000, 32 (06) : 661 - 669
  • [50] Willingness to pay for water quality and supply enhancements in the Grand River watershed
    Univ of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
    [J]. Can Water Resour J, 3 (275-285):