共 50 条
Suicide interventions for American Indian and Alaska Native populations: A systematic review of outcomes
被引:11
|作者:
Pham, Tony, V
[1
]
Fetter, Anna Kawennison
[2
]
Wiglesworth, Andrea
[3
]
Rey, LittleDove F.
[4
]
Chicken, Micah L. Prairie
[5
]
Azarani, Michael
[6
]
Riegelman, Amy
[7
]
Gone, Joseph P.
[8
]
机构:
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Global Hlth & Social Med, 641 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Counseling Psychol, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Palo Alto Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, PGSP Stanford Psy D Consortium, Palo Alto, CA USA
[5] Univ North Dakota, Dept Psychol, Grand Forks, ND USA
[6] Oklahoma State Univ, Counseling Psychol, Stillwater, OK USA
[7] Univ Minnesota, Univ Lib, Minneapolis, MN USA
[8] Harvard Univ, Dept Anthropol, Cambridge, MA USA
来源:
关键词:
American Indian populations;
Suicide;
Program development;
Preventive interventions;
Mental health disparities;
Community-engaged research;
SKILLS DEVELOPMENT CURRICULUM;
MENTAL-HEALTH-SERVICES;
HISTORICAL TRAUMA;
UNEQUAL RANDOMIZATION;
COMMUNITY-DEVELOPMENT;
CLINICAL-TRIALS;
ALCOHOL-ABUSE;
PREVENTION;
YOUTH;
SURVEILLANCE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ssmmh.2021.100029
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Objective: A 2018 Center for Disease Control and Prevention report estimated that 22.1 per 100,000 American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) individuals died by suicide, much higher than the overall U.S. rate of 14.2. To understand how to remedy this problem, we performed a systematic review in response to the following question: "What interventions work to prevent AI/AN suicide?" Method: We adopted a broad inclusionary stance while searching, screening, and extracting data. Our search strategy yielded 1605 unique citations, and after screening 28 items met the set criteria. Results: While participants from each study reported an improvement on at least one targeted measure, particularly along community-driven outcome measures, several methodological modifications arose to meet the ideals of both practice- and evidence-based research. For example, only 11 studies featured assessments that measured changes in direct suicide outcomes. Among these 11 studies, only four featured either a randomized or a nonrandomized controlled trial. Furthermore, only one intervention produced consistent outcomes across several studies. Nevertheless, the results from our reviewed corpus were methodologically innovative and suggest an overall benefit to AI/AN communities. Conclusions: The case for these interventions could be augmented through a variety of methodological advancements. Thus, we propose that future studies dismantle their interventions into underlying processes, evaluate these processes using direct, standardized measures of suicidal behavior, and incentivize AI/AN recruitment into research trials outside of Indian Country.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:10
相关论文