Using Hybrid Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technologies for Sustainability in Going-Concern Prediction

被引:7
|
作者
Chi, Der-Jang [1 ]
Shen, Zong-De [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Culture Univ, Dept Accounting, 55 Hwa Kang Rd, Taipei 11114, Taiwan
关键词
going concern; artificial intelligence (AI); machine learning; classification and regression trees (CART); chi-squared automatic interaction detector (CHAID); extreme gradient boosting (XGB); artificial neural network (ANN); support vector machine (SVM); C5; 0; AUDITORS;
D O I
10.3390/su14031810
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The going-concern opinions of certified public accountants (CPAs) and auditors are very critical, and due to misjudgments, the failure to discover the possibility of bankruptcy can cause great losses to financial statement users and corporate stakeholders. Traditional statistical models have disadvantages in giving going-concern opinions and are likely to cause misjudgments, which can have significant adverse effects on the sustainable survival and development of enterprises and investors' judgments. In order to embrace the era of big data, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies have been used in recent studies to judge going concern doubts and reduce judgment errors. The Big Four accounting firms (Deloitte, KPMG, PwC, and EY) are paying greater attention to auditing via big data and artificial intelligence (AI). Thus, this study integrates AI and machine learning technologies: in the first stage, important variables are selected by two decision tree algorithms, classification and regression trees (CART), and a chi-squared automatic interaction detector (CHAID); in the second stage, classification models are respectively constructed by extreme gradient boosting (XGB), artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), and C5.0 for comparison, and then, financial and non-financial variables are adopted to construct effective going-concern opinion decision models (which are more accurate in prediction). The subjects of this study are listed companies and OTC (over-the-counter) companies in Taiwan with and without going-concern doubts from 2000 to 2019. According to the empirical results, among the eight models constructed in this study, the prediction accuracy of the CHAID-C5.0 model is the highest (95.65%), followed by the CART-C5.0 model (92.77%).
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Unlocking the Power of Artificial Intelligence: Accurate Zeta Potential Prediction Using Machine Learning
    Muneer, Rizwan
    Hashmet, Muhammad Rehan
    Pourafshary, Peyman
    Shakeel, Mariam
    NANOMATERIALS, 2023, 13 (07)
  • [32] Risk Prediction of Diabetic Foot Amputation Using Machine Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence
    Oei, Chien Wei
    Chan, Yam Meng
    Zhang, Xiaojin
    Leo, Kee Hao
    Yong, Enming
    Chong, Rhan Chaen
    Hong, Qiantai
    Zhang, Li
    Pan, Ying
    Tan, Glenn Wei Leong
    Mak, Malcolm Han Wen
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024,
  • [33] On the Technologies of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for 2D Materials
    Kirsanova, D. Yu.
    Soldatov, M. A.
    Gadzhimagomedova, Z. M.
    Pashkov, D. M.
    Chernov, A. V.
    Butakova, M. A.
    Soldatov, A. V.
    JOURNAL OF SURFACE INVESTIGATION, 2021, 15 (03): : 485 - 494
  • [34] Artificial intelligence and machine learning in practice: Introducing teams to digital technologies
    Schoenmaker, Fransje
    BWK- Energie-Fachmagazin, 2021, 73 (3-4): : 24 - 25
  • [35] Barriers to adopting artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies in nuclear power
    Hall, Anna
    Agarwal, Vivek
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2024, 175
  • [36] On the Technologies of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for 2D Materials
    D. Yu. Kirsanova
    M. A. Soldatov
    Z. M. Gadzhimagomedova
    D. M. Pashkov
    A. V. Chernov
    M. A. Butakova
    A. V. Soldatov
    Journal of Surface Investigation: X-ray, Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques, 2021, 15 : 485 - 494
  • [37] Prediction of the elastic modulus of recycled aggregate concrete applying hybrid artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms
    Zhang, Qian
    Afzal, Mansour
    STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2022, 23 (04) : 2477 - 2495
  • [38] Machine learning is not artificial intelligence
    Haller, Ben
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2019, 242 (3228) : 26 - 26
  • [39] Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
    Dutta, Ashutosh
    Chng, Baw
    Kataria, Deepak
    Walid, Anwar
    Darema, Frederica
    Daneshmand, Mahmoud
    Enright, Michael A.
    Chen, Chi-Ming
    Gu, Rentao
    Wang, Honggang
    Lackpour, Alex
    Das, Pranab
    Ramachandran, Prakash
    Lala, T. K.
    Schrage, Reinhard
    Ranpara, Ripal Dilipbhai
    2023 IEEE FUTURE NETWORKS WORLD FORUM, FNWF, 2024,
  • [40] Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
    del Campo, Matias
    Hybrids and Haecceities - Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, ACADIA 2022, 2023,