Using Hybrid Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technologies for Sustainability in Going-Concern Prediction

被引:7
|
作者
Chi, Der-Jang [1 ]
Shen, Zong-De [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Culture Univ, Dept Accounting, 55 Hwa Kang Rd, Taipei 11114, Taiwan
关键词
going concern; artificial intelligence (AI); machine learning; classification and regression trees (CART); chi-squared automatic interaction detector (CHAID); extreme gradient boosting (XGB); artificial neural network (ANN); support vector machine (SVM); C5; 0; AUDITORS;
D O I
10.3390/su14031810
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The going-concern opinions of certified public accountants (CPAs) and auditors are very critical, and due to misjudgments, the failure to discover the possibility of bankruptcy can cause great losses to financial statement users and corporate stakeholders. Traditional statistical models have disadvantages in giving going-concern opinions and are likely to cause misjudgments, which can have significant adverse effects on the sustainable survival and development of enterprises and investors' judgments. In order to embrace the era of big data, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies have been used in recent studies to judge going concern doubts and reduce judgment errors. The Big Four accounting firms (Deloitte, KPMG, PwC, and EY) are paying greater attention to auditing via big data and artificial intelligence (AI). Thus, this study integrates AI and machine learning technologies: in the first stage, important variables are selected by two decision tree algorithms, classification and regression trees (CART), and a chi-squared automatic interaction detector (CHAID); in the second stage, classification models are respectively constructed by extreme gradient boosting (XGB), artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), and C5.0 for comparison, and then, financial and non-financial variables are adopted to construct effective going-concern opinion decision models (which are more accurate in prediction). The subjects of this study are listed companies and OTC (over-the-counter) companies in Taiwan with and without going-concern doubts from 2000 to 2019. According to the empirical results, among the eight models constructed in this study, the prediction accuracy of the CHAID-C5.0 model is the highest (95.65%), followed by the CART-C5.0 model (92.77%).
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial Intelligence in Corporate Sustainability: Using LSTM and GRU for Going Concern Prediction
    Chi, Der-Jang
    Chu, Chien-Chou
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [2] Going-concern prediction using hybrid random forests and rough set approach
    Yeh, Ching-Chiang
    Chi, Der-Jang
    Lin, Yi-Rong
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 254 : 98 - 110
  • [3] Potable Water Quality Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Algorithms for Better Sustainability
    Yurtsever, Mustafa
    Emec, Murat
    EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW, 2023, 23 (02) : 265 - 278
  • [4] Auditor's going-concern opinion prediction: the case of Slovenia
    Zdolsek, Daniel
    Jagric, Timotej
    Kolar, Iztok
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, 35 (01): : 106 - 121
  • [5] Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies
    Krenn, Mario
    Landgraf, Jonas
    Foesel, Thomas
    Marquardt, Florian
    Physical Review A, 2023, 107 (01):
  • [6] Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies
    Krenn, Mario
    Landgraf, Jonas
    Foesel, Thomas
    Marquardt, Florian
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2023, 107 (01)
  • [7] Editorial to special issue on hybrid artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies in intelligent systems
    Hari Mohan Pandey
    Nik Bessis
    Swagtam Das
    David Windridge
    Ankit Chaudhary
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2020, 32 : 7743 - 7745
  • [8] Editorial to special issue on hybrid artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies in intelligent systems
    Pandey, Hari Mohan
    Bessis, Nik
    Das, Swagtam
    Windridge, David
    Chaudhary, Ankit
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2020, 32 (12): : 7743 - 7745
  • [9] Machine learning, artificial intelligence and the prediction of dementia
    Merkin, Alexander
    Krishnamurthi, Rita
    Medvedev, Oleg N.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 35 (02) : 123 - 129
  • [10] Artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies in ulcerative colitis
    Kulkarni, Chiraag
    Liu, Derek
    Fardeen, Touran
    Dickson, Eliza Rose
    Jang, Hyunsu
    Sinha, Sidhartha R.
    Gubatan, John
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 17