Evidence-based medicine in hypertension: what type of evidence?

被引:58
|
作者
Zanchetti, A
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Osped Maggiore, Ctr Interuniv Fisiol Clin & Ipertens, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[2] Ist Auxol Italiano, Milan, Italy
关键词
randomized controlled trials; antihypertensive treatment; outcomes; cardiovascular events; organ damage;
D O I
10.1097/01.hjh.0000170370.41387.1b
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Although placebo-controlled trials have been a powerful instrument to answer the question whether blood pressure lowering in hypertensive patients were beneficial or not, event-based trials comparing different active treatments have been less successful, and have generated the opinion that blood pressure lowering is the only relevant beneficial mechanism. Several limitations of these event-based trials should be considered, however only a proportion of the patients have received the initial randomized treatment alone, the goal reducing blood pressure level has rarely been achieved and small blood pressure differences have often been underestimated, patients have been randomized to given regimens as if blood pressure of all them should be equally responsive to different agents, and, finally, most trials have only included elderly or complicated hypertensive. The hypothesis is advanced that blood pressure lowering and ancillary properties of antihypertensive agents may play a different role at various stages of the continuum of cardiovascular disease. Only when hypertension-related complications are not too advanced, the different ability of different anti hypertensive agents to influence subclinical organ damage progression ("intermediate" endpoints) may be capable of influencing morbidity and mortality over a longer term than that usually explored by event-based trials. (c) 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:1113 / 1120
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What's Wrong with Evidence-Based Medicine?
    Fins, Joseph J.
    HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2016, 46 (01) : insidebackcover
  • [32] What is evidence-based medicine? A personal viewpoint
    Coulthard, Mark G.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2007, 90 (04) : 229 - 231
  • [33] Evidence-based medicine and evidence-based guidelines
    Sekimoto, Miho
    Imanaka, Yuichi
    PANCREAS, 2007, 35 (01) : 87 - 88
  • [34] Evidence-based retrieval in evidence-based medicine
    Patrick, TB
    Demiris, G
    Folk, LC
    Moxley, DE
    Mitchell, JA
    Tao, DH
    JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2004, 92 (02) : 196 - 199
  • [35] Evidence-based medicine and medicine-based evidence
    Barbui, C
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 26 (03) : 145 - 146
  • [36] Evidence-based abstracts: what research summaries should contain to support evidence-based medicine
    Assadi, Reza
    Zarghi, Nazila
    Shamloo, Alireza Sapehri
    Nikooiyan, Yasaman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2012, 10 (02): : 154 - 158
  • [37] What is right and what is wrong about evidence-based medicine?
    Julian, DG
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (09) : S2 - S5
  • [38] Overview of evidence-based medicine: Challenges for evidence-based laboratory medicine
    McQueen, MJ
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 47 (08) : 1536 - 1546
  • [39] The failure of evidence-based medicine in the treatment of hypertension in the elderly
    Knight, EL
    Glynn, RJ
    Mogun, H
    Avom, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1999, 47 (09) : S54 - S54
  • [40] Evidence-based medicine in physical and rehabilitation medicine: Is this evidence-based rehabilitation?
    Borg, Kristian
    Sunnerhagen, Katharina Stibrant
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2008, 40 (09) : 689 - 690