Field evaluation of micropropagated and conventionally propagated ginger in subtropical Queensland

被引:23
|
作者
Smith, MK
Hamill, SD
机构
[1] Queensland Dept. of Prim. Industries, Maroochy Hort. Research Station, SCMC, Nambour, QLD 4560
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1071/EA9960347
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The growth and performance of micropropagated ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) was compared with 'seed'-derived plants in field trials conducted in south-eastern Queensland. In the first generation ex vitro, micropropagated plants had significantly (P<0.01) reduced rhizome yield with smaller knobs and more roots. Micropropagated plants had a greater (P<0.01) shoot:root (rhizome) ratio compared with seed-derived plants. Shoots from micropropagated plants were also significantly (P<0.01) smaller with a greater number of shoots per plant. The unusual shoot morphology of the micropropagated plants did not appear to be related to the presence of benzylaminopurine, a plant growth hormone added to the multiplication medium, as plants subcultured for 3 cycles on a hormone-free medium also exhibited similar characteristics. Seed collected from the micropropagated plants and seed-derived plants was harvested and, despite the micropropagated seed being significantly (P<0.01) smaller, by the second generation ex vitro there were no significant differences between the treatments. Factors that can improve rhizome size, while reducing production costs, need to be identified before micropropagated plants can be recommended for routine use in the ginger industry as a source of disease and pest-free planting material.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 354
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laboratory and field evaluation of commercial repellent formulations against mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Queensland, Australia
    Frances, SP
    Marlow, RM
    Jansen, CC
    Huggins, RL
    Cooper, RD
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2005, 44 : 431 - 436
  • [32] Field evaluation of seven grasses for use in the revegetation of lands disturbed by coal mining in Central Queensland
    Harwood, MR
    Hacker, JB
    Mott, JJ
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1999, 39 (03) : 307 - 316
  • [33] Field Evaluation of a Stormwater Treatment Train with Pit Baskets and Filter Media Cartridges in Southeast Queensland
    Drapper, Darren
    Hornbuckle, Andy
    WATER, 2015, 7 (08): : 4496 - 4510
  • [34] Evaluation of sugarcane genotypes against yellow leaf disorder under field conditions in subtropical India
    Kumar, Atul
    Holkar, Somnath Kadappa
    Singh, Rachana
    Singh, Jyotsnendra
    Pathak, Ashwini Dutt
    ARCHIVES OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY AND PLANT PROTECTION, 2022, 55 (11) : 1327 - 1350
  • [35] Evaluation of micropropagated plantain and banana (Musa spp.) for banana streak badnavirus incidence under field and screenhouse conditions in Nigeria
    Dahal, G
    Gauhl, F
    Pasberg-Gauhl, C
    Hughes, JD
    Thottappilly, G
    Lockhart, BEL
    ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1999, 134 (02) : 181 - 191
  • [36] Comparative field evaluation of Bifenthrin and Permethrin as barrier treatments for military tents against mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia
    Frances, Stephen P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2006, 75 (05): : 69 - 69
  • [37] Field and laboratory evaluation of fungicides for the control of Phytophthora fruit rot of papaya in far north Queensland, Australia
    Vawdrey, L. L.
    Male, M.
    Grice, K. R. E.
    CROP PROTECTION, 2015, 67 : 116 - 120
  • [38] Evaluation of methods for field diagnosis of sodicity in soil and irrigation water in the sugarcane growing districts of Queensland, Australia
    Nelson, PN
    Lawer, AT
    Ham, GJ
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 2002, 40 (08): : 1249 - 1265
  • [39] Androgenic Activity Evaluation of Ginger Rhizome in Reducing Depression in the Forced Swimming Test of Rats Exposed to Electromagnetic Field (EMF)
    Khaki, Arash
    Farnam, Alireza
    Rouhani, Samaneh
    Imantalab, Bahram
    Seery, Saeed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH AND REPRODUCTION SCIENCES, 2013, 1 (02): : 56 - 63
  • [40] COMPARATIVE FIELD EVALUATION OF REPELLENT FORMULATIONS CONTAINING DEET AND IR3535 AGAINST MOSQUITOES IN QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA
    Frances, S. P.
    MacKenzie, D. O.
    Rowcliffe, K. L.
    Corcoran, S. K.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MOSQUITO CONTROL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 25 (04) : 511 - 513