The Effect of Cochlear-Implant-Mediated Electrical Stimulation on Spiral Ganglion Cells in Congenitally Deaf White Cats

被引:22
|
作者
Chen, Iris [1 ]
Limb, Charles J. [1 ]
Ryugo, David K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol HNS, Ctr Hearing & Balance, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Hearing & Balance, Dept Neurosci, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Garvan Inst Med Res, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
关键词
auditory nerve; cochlea; cochlear nucleus; cochleosaccular degeneration; congenital deafness; SENSORINEURAL HEARING-LOSS; AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM; GUINEA-PIG; HAIR-CELLS; CORTI LOSS; NERVE; SURVIVAL; DEGENERATION; PATHOLOGY; NEURONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10162-010-0234-3
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
It has long been observed that loss of auditory receptor cells is associated with the progressive degeneration of spiral ganglion cells. Chronic electrical stimulation via cochlear implantation has been used in an attempt to slow the rate of degeneration in cats neonatally deafened by ototoxic agents but with mixed results. The present study examined this issue using white cats with a history of hereditary deafness as an alternative animal model. Nineteen cats provided new data for this study: four normal-hearing cats, seven congenitally deaf white cats, and eight congenitally deaf white cats with unilateral cochlear implants. Data from additional cats were collected from the literature. Electrical stimulation began at 3 to 4 or 6 to 7 months after birth, and cats received stimulation for approximately 7 h a day, 5 days a week for 12 weeks. Quantitative analysis of spiral ganglion cell counts, cell density, and cell body size showed no marked improvement between cochlear-implanted and congenitally deaf subjects. Average ganglion cell size from cochlear-implanted and congenitally deaf cats was statistically similar and smaller than that of normal-hearing cats. Cell density from cats with cochlear implants tended to decrease within the upper basal and middle cochlear turns in comparison to congenitally deaf cats but remained at congenitally deaf levels within the lower basal and apical cochlear turns. These results provide no evidence that chronic electrical stimulation enhances spiral ganglion cell survival, cell density, or cell size compared to that of unstimulated congenitally deaf cats. Regardless of ganglion neuron status, there is unambiguous restoration of auditory nerve synapses in the cochlear nucleus of these cats implanted at the earlier age.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 603
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] The Effect of Electrical Stimulation on the Response of Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells
    Li, Wanying
    Xu, Zhen
    Wang, Hao
    Wu, Tianzhun
    2021 43RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2021, : 5704 - 5708
  • [22] Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation
    Carlyon, RP
    van Wieringen, A
    Deeks, JM
    Long, CJ
    Lyzenga, J
    Wouters, J
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2005, 205 (1-2) : 210 - 224
  • [23] Effect of reducing electrical stimulation rate on hearing performance of Nucleus® cochlear implant recipients
    Arora, Komal
    Plant, Kerrie
    Dawson, Pam
    Cowan, Robert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2025, 64 (02) : 173 - 182
  • [24] Multi-channel cochlear implant histopathology: Are fewer spiral ganglion cells really related to better clinical performance?
    Xu, Helen X.
    Kim, Grace H.
    Snissarenko, Eugene P.
    Cureoglu, Sebahattin
    Paparella, Michael M.
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2012, 132 (05) : 482 - 490
  • [25] Effect of soma polarization on electrical stimulation thresholds of retinal ganglion cells
    Sergeev, Evgeni N.
    Meffin, Hamish
    Tahayori, Bahman
    Grayden, David B.
    Burkitt, Anthony N.
    2013 6TH INTERNATIONAL IEEE/EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING (NER), 2013, : 1135 - 1138
  • [26] The upregulation of K+ and HCN channels in developing spiral ganglion neurons is mediated by cochlear inner hair cells
    Conrad, Linus J.
    Grandi, Fiorella C.
    Carlton, Adam J.
    Jeng, Jing-Yi
    de Tomasi, Lara
    Zarecki, Patryk
    Marcotti, Walter
    Johnson, Stuart L.
    Mustapha, Mirna
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2024, 602 (20): : 5329 - 5351
  • [27] Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical Stimulation
    Robert P. Carlyon
    John M. Deeks
    Colette M. McKay
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2015, 16 : 653 - 668
  • [28] Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical Stimulation
    Carlyon, Robert P.
    Deeks, John M.
    McKay, Colette M.
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 16 (05): : 653 - 668
  • [30] Survival-promoting effect of electrical stimulation on axotomized retinal ganglion cells
    Miyoshi, T
    Morimoto, T
    Yakura, T
    Okazaki, Y
    Kurimoto, T
    Inoue, T
    Sawai, H
    Fujikado, T
    Tano, Y
    Fukuda, Y
    NEURAL BASIS OF EARLY VISION, 2003, 11 : 156 - 159