Performance of the ground-based total ozone network assessed using satellite data

被引:40
|
作者
Fioletov, V. E. [1 ]
Labow, G. [3 ,4 ]
Evans, R. [11 ]
Hare, E. W. [1 ]
Koehler, U. [2 ]
McElroy, C. T. [1 ]
Miyagawa, K. [5 ]
Redondas, A. [6 ]
Savastiouk, V. [1 ]
Shalamyansky, A. M. [7 ]
Staehelin, J. [8 ]
Vanicek, K. [9 ]
Weber, M. [10 ]
机构
[1] Environm Canada, ARQX, Toronto, ON M3H 5T4, Canada
[2] Meteorol Observ Hohenpeissenberg, German Weather Serv, D-82383 Hohenpeissenberg, Germany
[3] Goddard Space Flight Ctr, NASA, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[4] Goddard Space Flight Ctr, SSAI Lanham, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[5] Japan Meteorol Agcy, Aerol Observ, Ozone & Radiat Div, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
[6] Natl Inst Meteorol, Izana Observ, E-38071 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
[7] Main Geophys Observ, St Petersburg 194018, Russia
[8] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Atmospher & Climate Sci, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[9] Czech Hydrometeorol Inst, Solar & Ozone Observ, Hradec Kralove 50008 8, Czech Republic
[10] Univ Bremen, Inst Environm Phys & Remote Sensing, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
[11] NOAA Earth Syst Res Lab, Global Monitoring Div, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2008JD009809
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[1] Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometer and filter ozonometer data available from the World Ozone and Ultraviolet Data Centre ( WOUDC) were compared with satellite total ozone measurements from TOMS ( onboard Nimbus 7, Meteor 3, and Earth Probe satellites), OMI ( AURA satellite) and GOME ( ERS- 2 satellite) instruments. Five characteristics of the difference with satellite data were calculated for each site and instrument type: the mean difference, the standard deviation of daily differences, the standard deviation of monthly differences, the amplitude of the seasonal component of the difference, and the range of annual values. All these characteristics were calculated for five 5- year- long bins and for each site separately for direct sun ( DS) and zenith sky ( ZS) ozone measurements. The main percentiles were estimated for the five characteristics of the difference and then used to establish criteria for "suspect'' or "outlier'' sites for each characteristic. About 61% of Dobson, 46% of Brewer, and 28% of filter stations located between 60 degrees S and 60 degrees N have no "suspect'' or "outlier'' characteristics. In nearly 90% of all cases, Dobson and Brewer sites demonstrated 5- year mean differences with satellites to be within +/- 3% ( for DS observations). The seasonal median difference between all Brewer DS measurements at 25 degrees- 60 degrees N and GOME and OMI overpasses remained within +/- 0.5% over a period of more than 10 years. The satellite instrument performance was also analyzed to determine typical measurement uncertainties. It is demonstrated that systematic differences between the analyzed satellite instruments are typically within +/- 2% and very rarely are they outside the +/- 3% envelope. As the satellite instrument measurements appear to be better than +/- 3%, ground- based instruments with precision values worse than +/- 3% are not particularly useful for the analyses of long- term changes and comparison with numerical simulations.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of total column ozone data from ground-based MFRSR measurements taken in the southern US region with OMI satellite retrievals
    Williams, Quinton L.
    Reddy, Remata S.
    Liu, Heping
    Benjamin, Markeitta S.
    Lu, Duanjun
    Greene, Kantave M.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2008, 35 (20)
  • [42] TROPOMI/S5P total ozone column data: global ground-based validation and consistency with other satellite missions
    Garane, Katerina
    Koukouli, Maria-Elissavet
    Verhoelst, Tijl
    Lerot, Christophe
    Heue, Klaus-Peter
    Fioletov, Vitali
    Balis, Dimitrios
    Bais, Alkiviadis
    Bazureau, Ariane
    Dehn, Angelika
    Goutail, Florence
    Granville, Jose
    Griffin, Debora
    Hubert, Daan
    Keppens, Arno
    Lambert, Jean-Christopher
    Loyola, Diego
    McLinden, Chris
    Pazmino, Andrea
    Pommereau, Jean-Pierre
    Redondas, Alberto
    Romahn, Fabian
    Valks, Pieter
    Van Roozendael, Michel
    Xu, Jian
    Zehner, Claus
    Zerefos, Christos
    Zimmer, Walter
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2019, 12 (10) : 5263 - 5287
  • [43] Seasonal trend analysis of published ground-based and TOMS total ozone data through 1991
    Reinsel, Gregory C.
    Tiao, George C.
    Wuebbles, Donald J.
    Kerr, James B.
    Miller, Alvin J.
    Nagatani, Ronald M.
    Bishop, Lane
    Ying, Lisa H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1994, 99 (D3) : 5449 - 5464
  • [44] Comparison between the total ozone observations made by ground-based and satellite-borne instrumentation at Athens, Greece
    Tsivola, E
    Christodoulakis, J
    Charami, E
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 26 (16) : 3561 - 3566
  • [45] ANALYSIS OF THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN GROUND-BASED AND SATELLITE TOTAL OZONE CONTENT MEASUREMENTS AT KYIV-GOLOSEYEV STATION
    Grytsai, A. V.
    Milinevsky, G. P.
    [J]. SPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-KOSMICNA NAUKA I TEHNOLOGIA, 2014, 20 (01): : 3 - 13
  • [46] GROUND-BASED AND SATELLITE EVIDENCE FOR A PRONOUNCED TOTAL-OZONE MINIMUM IN EARLY 1983 AND RESPONSIBLE ATMOSPHERIC LAYERS
    ANGELL, JK
    KORSHOVER, J
    PLANET, WG
    [J]. MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 1985, 113 (04) : 641 - 646
  • [47] Metrology of ground-based satellite validation: co-location mismatch and smoothing issues of total ozone comparisons
    Verhoelst, T.
    Granville, J.
    Hendrick, F.
    Koehler, U.
    Lerot, C.
    Pommereau, J. -P.
    Redondas, A.
    Van Roozendael, M.
    Lambert, J. -C.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2015, 8 (12) : 5039 - 5062
  • [48] Global and zonal total ozone variations estimated from ground-based and satellite measurements: 1964-2000
    Fioletov, VE
    Bodeker, GE
    Miller, AJ
    McPeters, RD
    Stolarski, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2002, 107 (D22)
  • [49] Estimating corn nitrogen status using ground-based and satellite multispectral data
    Bausch, WC
    Diker, K
    Khosla, R
    Paris, JF
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING AND MODELING OF ECOSYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2004, 5544 : 489 - 498
  • [50] COMPARISON OF GROUND-BASED AND TOTAL OZONE MAPPING SPECTROMETER MEASUREMENTS USED IN ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE GLOBAL OZONE OBSERVING SYSTEM
    BOJKOV, RD
    MATEER, CL
    HANSSON, AL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1988, 93 (D8): : 9525 - 9533