Performance of the ground-based total ozone network assessed using satellite data

被引:40
|
作者
Fioletov, V. E. [1 ]
Labow, G. [3 ,4 ]
Evans, R. [11 ]
Hare, E. W. [1 ]
Koehler, U. [2 ]
McElroy, C. T. [1 ]
Miyagawa, K. [5 ]
Redondas, A. [6 ]
Savastiouk, V. [1 ]
Shalamyansky, A. M. [7 ]
Staehelin, J. [8 ]
Vanicek, K. [9 ]
Weber, M. [10 ]
机构
[1] Environm Canada, ARQX, Toronto, ON M3H 5T4, Canada
[2] Meteorol Observ Hohenpeissenberg, German Weather Serv, D-82383 Hohenpeissenberg, Germany
[3] Goddard Space Flight Ctr, NASA, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[4] Goddard Space Flight Ctr, SSAI Lanham, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[5] Japan Meteorol Agcy, Aerol Observ, Ozone & Radiat Div, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
[6] Natl Inst Meteorol, Izana Observ, E-38071 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
[7] Main Geophys Observ, St Petersburg 194018, Russia
[8] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Atmospher & Climate Sci, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[9] Czech Hydrometeorol Inst, Solar & Ozone Observ, Hradec Kralove 50008 8, Czech Republic
[10] Univ Bremen, Inst Environm Phys & Remote Sensing, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
[11] NOAA Earth Syst Res Lab, Global Monitoring Div, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2008JD009809
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[1] Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometer and filter ozonometer data available from the World Ozone and Ultraviolet Data Centre ( WOUDC) were compared with satellite total ozone measurements from TOMS ( onboard Nimbus 7, Meteor 3, and Earth Probe satellites), OMI ( AURA satellite) and GOME ( ERS- 2 satellite) instruments. Five characteristics of the difference with satellite data were calculated for each site and instrument type: the mean difference, the standard deviation of daily differences, the standard deviation of monthly differences, the amplitude of the seasonal component of the difference, and the range of annual values. All these characteristics were calculated for five 5- year- long bins and for each site separately for direct sun ( DS) and zenith sky ( ZS) ozone measurements. The main percentiles were estimated for the five characteristics of the difference and then used to establish criteria for "suspect'' or "outlier'' sites for each characteristic. About 61% of Dobson, 46% of Brewer, and 28% of filter stations located between 60 degrees S and 60 degrees N have no "suspect'' or "outlier'' characteristics. In nearly 90% of all cases, Dobson and Brewer sites demonstrated 5- year mean differences with satellites to be within +/- 3% ( for DS observations). The seasonal median difference between all Brewer DS measurements at 25 degrees- 60 degrees N and GOME and OMI overpasses remained within +/- 0.5% over a period of more than 10 years. The satellite instrument performance was also analyzed to determine typical measurement uncertainties. It is demonstrated that systematic differences between the analyzed satellite instruments are typically within +/- 2% and very rarely are they outside the +/- 3% envelope. As the satellite instrument measurements appear to be better than +/- 3%, ground- based instruments with precision values worse than +/- 3% are not particularly useful for the analyses of long- term changes and comparison with numerical simulations.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An assessment of the world ground-based total ozone network performance from the comparison with satellite data
    Fioletov, VE
    Kerr, JB
    Hare, EW
    Labow, GJ
    McPeters, RD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D1) : 1737 - 1747
  • [2] Comparison of ground-based and satellite measurements of total ozone
    Izrael, Yu. A.
    Belokrinitskaya, L. M.
    Dvoretskaya, I. V.
    Dorokhov, V. M.
    Ivanov, K. A.
    Kruchenitskii, G. M.
    Shepelev, D. V.
    Yusipov, T. A.
    [J]. RUSSIAN METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOGY, 2014, 39 (06) : 420 - 430
  • [3] Comparison of ground-based and satellite measurements of total ozone
    Yu. A. Izrael
    L. M. Belokrinitskaya
    I. V. Dvoretskaya
    V. M. Dorokhov
    K. A. Ivanov
    G. M. Kruchenitskii
    D. V. Shepelev
    T. A. Yusipov
    [J]. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 2014, 39 : 420 - 430
  • [4] Intercomparison of satellite and ground-based ozone total column measurements
    Virolainen, Ya. A.
    Timofeyev, Yu. M.
    Poberovsky, A. V.
    [J]. IZVESTIYA ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC PHYSICS, 2013, 49 (09) : 993 - 1001
  • [5] Quality checks for satellite and ground-based total ozone observations
    Spankuch, D
    Schulz, E
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC OZONE DYNAMICS: OBSERVATIONS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION, 1997, 53 : 293 - 302
  • [6] Intercomparison of satellite and ground-based ozone total column measurements
    Ya. A. Virolainen
    Yu. M. Timofeyev
    A. V. Poberovsky
    [J]. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 2013, 49 : 993 - 1001
  • [7] A COMPARISON OF TOTAL OZONE DATA FROM SATELLITE AND GROUND-BASED OBSERVATIONS AT NORTHERN LATITUDES
    HEESE, B
    BARTHEL, K
    HOV, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1992, 97 (D4) : 3825 - 3830
  • [8] Temporal Variability of Total Ozone in the Asian Region Inferred from Ground-Based and Satellite Measurement Data
    Visheratin, K. N.
    Nerushev, A. F.
    Orozaliev, M. D.
    Zheng Xiangdong
    Sun Shumen
    Liu, Li
    [J]. IZVESTIYA ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC PHYSICS, 2017, 53 (09) : 894 - 903
  • [9] Validation of total ozone data between satellite and ground-based measurements at Zhongshan and Syowa stations in Antarctica
    BIAN Lingen
    LIN Zhong
    ZHANG Dongqi
    ZHENG Xiangdong
    LU Longhua
    [J]. Advances in Polar Science, 2012, 23 (04) : 196 - 203
  • [10] Temporal Variability of Total Ozone in the Asian Region Inferred from Ground-Based and Satellite Measurement Data
    K. N. Visheratin
    A. F. Nerushev
    M. D. Orozaliev
    Xiangdong Zheng
    Shumen Sun
    Li Liu
    [J]. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 2017, 53 : 894 - 903