Severity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Rome Foundation Working Team Report

被引:168
|
作者
Drossman, Douglas A. [1 ]
Chang, L. [2 ]
Bellamy, N. [3 ]
Gallo-Torres, H. E. [4 ]
Lembo, A. [5 ]
Mearin, F. [6 ]
Norton, N. J. [7 ]
Whorwell, P. [8 ]
机构
[1] UNC Ctr Funct GI & Motil Disorders, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] UCLA Ctr Neurobiol Stress, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Queensland, Ctr Natl Res Disabil & Rehabil Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] US FDA, Div Gastrointestinal & Coagulat Drug Prod, Bethesda, MD 20014 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[6] Ctr Med Teknon, Inst Funct & Motor Digest Disorders, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Int Fdn Funct Gastrointestinal Disorders, Milwaukee, WI USA
[8] Univ Manchester, Wythenshawe Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2011年 / 106卷 / 10期
关键词
HEALTH-STATUS; ILLNESS SEVERITY; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ABDOMINAL-PAIN; PRIMARY-CARE; IBS; SYMPTOMS; PREVALENCE; DISORDERS; MODERATE;
D O I
10.1038/ajg.2011.201
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: The concept of severity in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is clinically recognized and operative in diagnostic decision making and treatment planning. Yet, there is no consensus on its definition, and there are limited data on the prevalence of severity subgroups, its medical and psychosocial determinants, and its association with other health status measures. The aims of the Rome Foundation Working Team Committee were to summarize current research, to develop a consensus of understanding on this concept, and to make recommendations for its use in research and clinical care. METHODS: In 2006, a multinational committee of clinical investigators with expertise in IBS and/or psychometric research methods undertook a systematic review of the literature relating to severity in IBS. Owing to limited data, the Foundation commissioned three clinical studies to better characterize the concept of severity in IBS, and summary information and recommendations for future research and clinical care were developed. RESULTS: The main findings were: (i) severity in IBS is defined as a biopsychosocial composite of patient-reported gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms, degree of disability, and illness-related perceptions and behaviors; (ii) both visceral and central nervous system physiological factors affect severity; as severity increases, the central nervous system provides a greater contribution; (iii) severity is related to and influences health-related quality of life and health behaviors and also guides diagnostic and therapeutic clinical decision making; (iv) severity can be subcategorized into clinically meaningful subgroups as mild (similar to 40 %), moderate (similar to 35 %), and severe (similar to 25 %), and this provides a working model for use in future research and clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: Future work is required to understand more precisely the factors contributing to severity and to develop a valid patient-reported instrument to measure severity in IBS.
引用
收藏
页码:1749 / 1759
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Burden of illness in irritable bowel syndrome comparing Rome I and Rome II criteria
    Badia, X
    Mearin, F
    Balboa, A
    Baró, E
    Caldwell, E
    Cucala, M
    Díaz-Rubio, M
    Fueyo, A
    Ponce, J
    Roset, M
    Talley, NJ
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2002, 20 (11) : 749 - 758
  • [42] Utility of the Rome I and Rome II criteria for irritable bowel syndrome in US women
    Chey, WD
    Olden, K
    Carter, E
    Boyle, J
    Drossman, D
    Chang, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (11): : 2803 - 2811
  • [43] Rome IV Criteria exceed Rome III Criteria in a Diagnosis of irritable Bowel Syndrome
    Di Lellis, Maddalena Angela
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2020, 58 (12): : 1164 - +
  • [44] Burden of Illness in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Comparing Rome I and Rome II Criteria
    Xavier Badia
    Fermin Mearin
    Agustin Balboa
    Eva Baró
    Ellen Caldwell
    Mercedes Cucala
    Manuel Díaz-Rubio
    Arturo Fueyo
    Julio Ponce
    Mentse Roset
    Nicholas J. Talley
    PharmacoEconomics, 2002, 20 : 749 - 758
  • [45] Agreement between Rome I and Rome II diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome
    Whitehead, WE
    Levy, RL
    Longstreth, G
    Feld, AD
    Jones, KR
    Drossman, DA
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2000, 62 (01): : 108 - 108
  • [46] Prevalence and impact of Rome IV versus Rome III irritable bowel syndrome in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
    Fairbrass, Keeley M.
    Selinger, Christian P.
    Gracie, David J.
    Ford, Alexander C.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2022, 34 (05):
  • [47] Subtyping irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) by the predominant bowel habit: Agreement between Rome II and Rome III
    Ersryd, Amanda
    Agerforz, Pia
    Ringstrom, Gisela
    Posserud, Iris
    Abrahamsson, Hasse
    Simren, Magnus
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 132 (04) : A679 - A679
  • [48] The irritable bowel severity scoring system: A simple method of monitoring irritable bowel syndrome and its progress
    Francis, CY
    Morris, J
    Whorwell, PJ
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1997, 11 (02) : 395 - 402