Loco-regional recurrence after skin and nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction using free flap autologous tissue in a single institution

被引:6
|
作者
Stansfield, J. [1 ]
Koshy, O. [1 ]
Shah, A. [2 ]
Thompson, P. [1 ]
Riogi, B. [2 ]
Taghizadeh, R. [1 ]
Bennett, S. [1 ]
Chagla, L. [2 ]
机构
[1] St Helens & Knowsley Teaching Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] St Helens & Knowsley Teaching Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
Loco-regional recurrence; Nipple-sparing mastectomy; Skin-sparing mastectomy; Immediate breast reconstruction; Breast cancer; CANCER RECURRENCE; POSTMASTECTOMY RECONSTRUCTION; LOCOREGIONAL RECURRENCE; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Immediate autologous tissue breast reconstruction after skin-and nipple-sparing mastectomy, is becoming increasingly popular, while the benefits are evident, the concern is in leaving breast tissue under the skin envelope, which could potentially lead to a higher chance of recurrence. We aim to determine the incidence and study the management of loco-regional recurrence (LR) of breast cancer following immediate autologous free flap reconstruction (AFFR) from a 10-year database at a single tertiary breast unit. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients who underwent AFFR between July 2008 and December 2018. All patients undergoing delayed reconstruction and risk-reducing surgery were excluded, leaving a total of 216 patients. Statistical analysis was performed to determine significance in the prediction of LR. Management and outcome of the LR was also studied. Results: LR was found in 7/216 cases (3.25%). The median age at surgery for patients with LR, was 45 (range 31-54). Median time to recurrence was 54 months (7-79 months). Three patients presented with self-detected lesions. In all, 6/7 patients were ER/PR positive, 2/7 were HER2 + at recurrence, and 1/7 was triple negative. All patients underwent surgical excision for the LR followed by radiotherapy, either chemother-apy (n-5) and/or hormone therapy (n-2). No patients have developed further LR. Because of low numbers of recurrences, no statistical significance was observed for factors causing recurrence . Conclusion: The low LR we report demonstrates that immediate AFFR is oncologically safe. Timely recognition through post-reconstruction patient education and appropriate manage-ment results in good outcomes. (c) 2020 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by El-sevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1770 / 1778
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Immediate Breast Reconstruction (IBR) After Skin-sparing Mastectomy (SSM) Does Not Increase the Risk of Loco Regional Recurrence or Distant Metastases
    van Mierlo, D.
    Schipper, R.
    van Waardhuizen, O.
    Martens, M.
    Peeters, W.
    Boetes, C.
    Heuts, E.
    Smidt, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S372 - S373
  • [42] Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Robotic Latissimus Dorsi Flap Harvest: Technique and Results
    Houvenaeghel, Gilles
    Cohen, Monique
    Ribeiro, Sandrine Rua
    Barrou, Julien
    Heinemann, Mellie
    Frayret, Christine
    Lambaudie, Eric
    Bannier, Marie
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2020, 27 (05) : 481 - 491
  • [43] Clinicopathological features and prognosis of nipple-areola and skin flap recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer over 20 years
    Sakurai, T.
    Suzuma, T.
    Yoshimura, G.
    Sasaki, E.
    Umemura, T.
    Sakurai, T.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (04)
  • [44] Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous tissue reconstruction after whole-breast irradiation
    Disa, JJ
    Cordeiro, PG
    Heerdt, AH
    Petrek, JA
    Borgen, PJ
    Hidalgo, DA
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (01) : 118 - 124
  • [45] "Breast in a Day": Examining Single-Stage Immediate, Permanent Implant Reconstruction in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Choi, Mihye
    Frey, Jordan D.
    Alperovich, Michael
    Levine, Jamie P.
    Karp, Nolan S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 138 (02) : 184E - 191E
  • [46] Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap without skin paddle using delayed primary retention suture
    Francis, Eamon C.
    Dimovska, Eleonora O. F.
    Chou, Hsu-Huan
    Lin, Yi-Ling
    Cheng, Ming-Huei
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 125 (08) : 1202 - 1210
  • [47] Direct-to-Implant versus Immediate Free Flap Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Abdou, Salma A.
    Sharif-Askary, Banafsheh
    Perez-Alvarez, Idanis
    Lavin, Christopher V.
    Bartholomew, Alex J.
    Sosin, Michael
    Tousimis, Eleni
    Fan, Kenneth L.
    Song, David H.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 151 (06) : 1137 - 1145
  • [48] Long-term outcomes of patients with breast cancer after nipple-sparing mastectomy/skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction: Comparison with conventional mastectomy in a single center study
    Lee, Sae Byul
    Lee, Jong Won
    Kim, Hee Jeong
    Ko, Beom Seok
    Son, Byung Ho
    Eom, Jin Sup
    Lee, Taik Jong
    Ahn, Sei-Hyun
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (18)
  • [49] Patient Satisfaction and Nipple-Areola Sensitivity After Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction in a High Breast Cancer Risk Population Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
    van Verschuer, Victorien M. T.
    Mureau, Marc A. M.
    Gopie, Jessica P.
    Vos, Elvira L.
    Verhoef, Cornelis
    Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B. E.
    Koppert, Linetta B.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 77 (02) : 145 - 152
  • [50] ASO Author Reflections: Risk of Locoregional Recurrence After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Wu, Zhen Yu
    Ko, BeomSeok
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (05) : 1636 - 1637