SimBA: A methodology and tools for evaluating the performance of RNA-Seq bioinformatic pipelines

被引:6
|
作者
Audoux, Jerome [1 ,2 ]
Salson, Mikael [3 ]
Grosset, Christophe F. [4 ]
Beaumeunier, Sacha [1 ,2 ]
Holder, Jean-Marc [1 ,2 ]
Commes, Therese [1 ,2 ]
Philippe, Nicolas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CHR Montpellier, Hop St Eloi, IRMB, SeqOne, 80 Ave Augustin Fliche, F-34295 Montpellier, France
[2] Inst Computat Biol, 860 Rue St Priest, F-34095 Montpellier 5, France
[3] Univ Lille, CNRS, CRIStAL Ctr Rech Informat Signal & Automat Lille, INRIA,Cent Lille,UMR 9189, F-59000 Lille, France
[4] Univ Bordeaux, INSERM, BMGIC, U1035, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
来源
BMC BIOINFORMATICS | 2017年 / 18卷
关键词
RNA-Seq; Transcriptomics; Benchmark; Pipeline optimization; FRAMEWORK; ALIGNMENT; DISCOVERY; BENCHMARK;
D O I
10.1186/s12859-017-1831-5
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: The evolution of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies has led to increased focus on RNA-Seq. Many bioinformatic tools have been developed for RNA-Seq analysis, each with unique performance characteristics and configuration parameters. Users face an increasingly complex task in understanding which bioinformatic tools are best for their specific needs and how they should be configured. In order to provide some answers to these questions, we investigate the performance of leading bioinformatic tools designed for RNA-Seq analysis and propose a methodology for systematic evaluation and comparison of performance to help users make well informed choices. Results: To evaluate RNA-Seq pipelines, we developed a suite of two benchmarking tools. SimCT generates simulated datasets that get as close as possible to specific real biological conditions accompanied by the list of genomic incidents and mutations that have been inserted. BenchCT then compares the output of any bioinformatics pipeline that has been run against a SimCT dataset with the simulated genomic and transcriptional variations it contains to give an accurate performance evaluation in addressing specific biological question. We used these tools to simulate a real-world genomic medicine question s involving the comparison of healthy and cancerous cells. Results revealed that performance in addressing a particular biological context varied significantly depending on the choice of tools and settings used. We also found that by combining the output of certain pipelines, substantial performance improvements could be achieved. Conclusion: Our research emphasizes the importance of selecting and configuring bioinformatic tools for the specific biological question being investigated to obtain optimal results. Pipeline designers, developers and users should include benchmarking in the context of their biological question as part of their design and quality control process. Our SimBA suite of benchmarking tools provides a reliable basis for comparing the performance of RNA-Seq bioinformatics pipelines in addressing a specific biological question. We would like to see the creation of a reference corpus of data-sets that would allow accurate comparison between benchmarks performed by different groups and the publication of more benchmarks based on this public corpus. SimBA software and data-set are available at http://cractools.gforge.inria.fr/softwares/simba/.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A benchmark for RNA-seq quantification pipelines (vol 17, 74, 2016)
    Teng, Mingxiang
    Love, Michael I.
    Davis, Carrie A.
    Djebali, Sarah
    Dobin, Alexander
    Graveley, Brenton R.
    Li, Sheng
    Mason, Christopher E.
    Olson, Sara
    Pervouchine, Dmitri
    Sloan, Cricket A.
    Wei, Xintao
    Zhan, Lijun
    Irizarry, Rafael A.
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2016, 17
  • [32] Commentary: A Systematic Evaluation of Single Cell RNA-Seq Analysis Pipelines
    Kadota, Koji
    Shimizu, Kentaro
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2020, 11
  • [33] A benchmark for RNA-seq quantification pipelines (vol 17, 74, 2016)
    Teng, Mingxiang
    Love, Michael I.
    Davis, Carrie A.
    Djebali, Sarah
    Dobin, Alexander
    Graveley, Brenton R.
    Li, Sheng
    Mason, Christopher E.
    Olson, Sara
    Pervouchine, Dmitri
    Sloan, Cricket A.
    Wei, Xintao
    Zhan, Lijun
    Irizarry, Rafael A.
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2016, 17
  • [34] Bioinformatic analysis of RNA-seq data unveiled critical genes in rectal adenocarcinoma
    Zuo, Z. -G.
    Zhang, X. -F.
    Ye, X. -Z.
    Zhou, Z. -H.
    Wu, X. -B.
    Ni, S. -C.
    Song, H. -Y.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (14) : 3017 - 3025
  • [35] Evaluation and comparison of computational tools for RNA-seq isoform quantification
    Chi Zhang
    Baohong Zhang
    Lih-Ling Lin
    Shanrong Zhao
    BMC Genomics, 18
  • [36] Systematic evaluation of differential splicing tools for RNA-seq studies
    Mehmood, Arfa
    Laiho, Asta
    Venalainen, Mikko S.
    McGlinchey, Aidan J.
    Wang, Ning
    Elo, Laura L.
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2020, 21 (06) : 2052 - 2065
  • [37] Evaluation and comparison of computational tools for RNA-seq isoform quantification
    Zhang, Chi
    Zhang, Baohong
    Lin, Lih-Ling
    Zhao, Shanrong
    BMC GENOMICS, 2017, 18
  • [38] piPipes: a set of pipelines for piRNA and transposon analysis via small RNA-seq, RNA-seq, degradome- and CAGE-seq, ChIP-seq and genomic DNA sequencing
    Han, Bo W.
    Wang, Wei
    Zamore, Phillip D.
    Weng, Zhiping
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 31 (04) : 593 - 595
  • [39] Variability in estimated gene expression among commonly used RNA-seq pipelines
    Sonali Arora
    Siobhan S. Pattwell
    Eric C. Holland
    Hamid Bolouri
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [40] Variability in estimated gene expression among commonly used RNA-seq pipelines
    Arora, Sonali
    Pattwell, Siobhan S.
    Holland, Eric C.
    Bolouri, Hamid
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)