A Scenario-Based Analysis of Forest Product Transportation Using a Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method

被引:4
|
作者
Akay, Anil Orhan [1 ]
Demir, Murat [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Fac Forestry, Dept Forest Construct & Transportat, TR-34473 Istanbul, Turkey
来源
FORESTS | 2022年 / 13卷 / 05期
关键词
long distance transport; traffic infrastructure network; timber harvesting; CO2; emission; TOPSIS; AHP; EXTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; TIMBER TRUCKING; FUEL CONSUMPTION; TIME CONSUMPTION; MOISTURE-CONTENT; BIOMASS; ENERGY; EFFICIENCY; PERFORMANCE; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.3390/f13050730
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to reveal the weight values of the criteria that are effective in selecting the most suitable vehicle types in forest products transportation by using hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method. According to different scenarios, the goal is to determine which vehicle alternative is the most suitable in given conditions. In the results obtained from the study, it is determined that the most important main criterion in determining the eligibility of vehicle alternatives in forest products transport is the environmental damage criterion, while the other main criteria are cost and operational performance, in order of importance. In the scope of the study, transportation scenarios including different operational conditions were created and the suitability of vehicle alternatives was evaluated according to the scenarios, taking into account CO2 emission and road surface damage risk criteria. Transportation of coniferous and broadleaved tree species makes a difference in vehicle suitability rankings according to transportation scenarios. In addition, it was observed that the variability in the amount of roundwoods to be transported affects the vehicle suitability rankings. It will be beneficial to consider the total weight of the forest product to be transported and the tree species in the selection vehicle type.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Method Based on Intuitionistic Interval Fuzzy Information
    Jian-qiang Wang
    Zhi-qiu Han
    Hong-yu Zhang
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2014, 23 : 715 - 733
  • [22] Multi-criteria decision-making method based on intuitionistic normal fuzzy aggregation operators
    Wang, Jian-Qiang
    Li, Kang-Jian
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2013, 33 (06): : 1501 - 1508
  • [23] Linguistic hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on evidential reasoning
    Zhou, Huan
    Wang, Jian-qiang
    Zhang, Hong-yu
    Chen, Xiao-hong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2016, 47 (02) : 314 - 327
  • [24] A new fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on proximity index value
    Mufazzal, Sameera
    Khan, Noor Zaman
    Muzakkir, S. M.
    Siddiquee, Arshad Noor
    Khan, Zahid
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2022, 39 (01) : 42 - 58
  • [25] An extension of fuzzy decision maps for multi-criteria decision-making
    Elomda, Basem Mohamed
    Hefny, Hesham Ahmed
    Hassan, Hesham Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2013, 14 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [26] Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Method Based on Intuitionistic Interval Fuzzy Information
    Wang, Jian-qiang
    Han, Zhi-qiu
    Zhang, Hong-yu
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2014, 23 (04) : 715 - 733
  • [27] The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method
    Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 115 - 123
  • [28] FUZZY-SETS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    TONG, RM
    HUMAN SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 1982, 3 (04): : 266 - 268
  • [29] Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making in the assignment problem
    DrorRein, E
    Mitchell, HB
    SIGNAL AND DATA PROCESSING OF SMALL TARGETS 1997, 1997, 3163 : 525 - 534
  • [30] Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach for Supplier Evaluation in Fuzzy Environment
    Bhayana, Nidhi
    Gandhi, Kanika
    Jha, P. C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING FOR PROBLEM SOLVING (SOCPROS 2015), VOL 2, 2016, 437 : 991 - 1009