Implant decontamination with phosphoric acid during surgical peri-implantitis treatment: a RCT

被引:22
|
作者
Hentenaar, Diederik F. M. [1 ]
De Waal, Yvonne C. M. [2 ]
Strooker, Hans [2 ]
Meijer, Henny J. A. [1 ,2 ]
Van Winkelhoff, Arie-Jan [2 ,3 ]
Raghoebar, Gerry M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, POB 30-001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Ctr Dent & Oral Hyg, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Med Microbiol, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Peri-implantitis; Decontamination; Dental implants; Surgery; Microbiology; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; RE-OSSEOINTEGRATION; TITANIUM SURFACES; DOUBLE-BLIND; CITRIC-ACID; IN-VITRO; THERAPY; MODALITIES; DISEASES; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1186/s40729-017-0091-5
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Peri-implantitis is known as an infectious disease that affects the peri-implant soft and hard tissue. Today, scientific literature provides very little evidence for an effective intervention protocol for treatment of peri-implantitis. The aim of the present randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the microbiological and clinical effectiveness of phosphoric acid as a decontaminating agent of the implant surface during surgical peri-implantitis treatment. Methods: Peri-implantitis lesions were treated with resective surgical treatment aimed at peri-implant granulation tissue removal, bone recontouring, and pocket elimination. Fifty-three implant surfaces in 28 patients were mechanically cleaned and treated with either 35% phosphoric etching gel (test group) or sterile saline (control group). Microbiological samples were obtained during surgery; clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and at 3 months after treatment. Data were analyzed using multi-variable linear regression analysis and multilevel statistics. Results: Significant immediate reductions in total anaerobic bacterial counts on the implant surface were found in both groups. Immediate reduction was greater when phosphoric acid was used. The difference in log-transformed mean anaerobic counts between both procedures was not statistical significant (p = 0.108), but there were significantly less culture-positive implants after the decontamination procedure in the phosphoric acid group (p = 0.042). At 3 months post-surgery, 75% of the implants in the control group and 63.3% of the implants in the test group showed disease resolution. However, no significant differences in clinical and microbiological outcomes between both groups were found. Conclusions: The application of 35% phosphoric acid after mechanical debridement is superior to mechanical debridement combined with sterile saline rinsing for decontamination of the implant surface during surgical peri-implantitis treatment. However, phosphoric acid as implant surface decontaminant does not seem to enhance clinical outcomes on a 3-month follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment modalities for peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis
    Renvert, Stefan
    Polyzois, Ioannis
    Persson, G. Rutger
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2013, 26 (06): : 313 - 318
  • [22] Significance of implant design on the efficacy of different peri-implantitis decontamination protocols
    Sanz-Martin, Ignacio
    Paeng, Kyeongwon
    Park, Hyobin
    Cha, Jae-Kook
    Jung, Ui-Won
    Sanz, Mariano
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (06) : 3589 - 3597
  • [23] Decontamination of Anodized Implant Surface With Different Modalities for Peri-Implantitis Treatment: Lasers and Mechanical Debridement With Citric Acid
    Htet, Moe
    Madi, Marwa
    Zakaria, Osama
    Miyahara, Takayuki
    Xin, Wang
    Lin, Zayar
    Aoki, Kazuhiro
    Kasugai, Shohei
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 87 (08) : 953 - 961
  • [24] Non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis
    Joerg Meyle
    Lucia Fischer-Wasels
    British Dental Journal, 2024, 237 (10) : 780 - 785
  • [25] Non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis:: a literature review
    Renvert, Stefan
    Roos-Jansaker, Ann-Marie
    Claffey, Noel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2008, 35 : 305 - 315
  • [26] Effects of decontamination and implant surface characteristics on re-osseointegration following treatment of peri-implantitis
    Parlar, Ates
    Bosshardt, Dieter D.
    Cetiner, Deniz
    Schafroth, Denis
    Unsal, Berrin
    Haytac, Cenk
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (04) : 391 - 399
  • [27] Prognostic indicators for surgical peri-implantitis treatment
    de Waal, Yvonne C. M.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Winkel, Edwin G.
    van Winkelhoff, Arie Jan
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (12) : 1485 - 1491
  • [28] Surgical Treatment of Severe Peri-Implantitis Using a Round Titanium Brush for Implant Surface Decontamination: A Case Report With Clinical Reentry
    An, Yin-Zhe
    Lee, Jae-Hong
    Heo, Young-Ku
    Lee, Jung-Seok
    Jung, Ui-Won
    Choi, Seong-Ho
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2017, 43 (03) : 219 - 227
  • [29] Surgical treatments of peri-implantitis
    Mombelli, Andrea
    Moene, Raphael
    Decaillet, Fabien
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2012, 5 : S61 - S70
  • [30] Surgical therapy of peri-implantitis
    Schwarz, Frank
    Jepsen, Soren
    Obreja, Karina
    Galarraga-Vinueza, Maria Elisa
    Ramanauskaite, Ausra
    PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2022, 88 (01) : 145 - 181