New method for evaluating maximal respiratory pressures: Concurrent validity, test-retest, and inter-rater reliability

被引:8
|
作者
Silveira, Bruna M. F. [1 ]
Pereira, Manoel C. B. [2 ]
Cardoso, Daniella R. [3 ]
Ribeiro-Samora, Giane A. [1 ]
Martins, Henrique R. [4 ]
Parreira, Veronica F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Rehabil Sci Program, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Elect Engn Program, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Phys Therapy, Ave Antonio Carlos,6627 Pampulha, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Elect Engn, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Chronic obstructive; pulmonary disease; Functional residual capacity; Measurement properties; Physical therapy; Respiratory muscles; DIAPHRAGM; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.04.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Maximal respiratory pressures (MRP) obtained at functional residual capacity (FRC) may reflect the real respiratory muscle pressure. Objectives: To evaluate concurrent validity, test-retest, and inter-rater reliability of MRP performed with a new instrument in healthy individuals, and to compare values obtained at different volumes in healthy individuals and individuals with COPD. Methods: MRP of 100 healthy individuals were obtained using the TrueForce and the MicroRPM (R) at residual volume (RV) and total lung capacity (TLC) to evaluate concurrent validity. MRP were obtained at FRC using the TrueForce to evaluate reliability. Comparisons of inspiratory pressure values (FRC compared to RV) and expiratory pressure values (FRC compared to TLC) were performed with 100 healthy individuals and 15 individuals with COPD. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.77 and 0.86 for concurrent validity for inspiratory and expiratory pressures, respectively. Test- retest reliability showed an ICC of 0.87 for inspiratory pressure, and 0.78 for expiratory pressure; inter-rater reliability showed an ICC of 0.91 for inspiratory pressure, and 0.84 for expiratory pressure. Measurements performed at RV and TLC were higher when compared to FRC [mean difference (95%CI)= -8.30 (- 11.82, -4.78) cmH(2)O; -37.29 (-42.63, -31.96) cmH(2)O] in healthy individuals, and -11.09 (- 15.83, -6.35) cmH(2)O; -57.14 (-71.05, -43.05) cmH(2)O in COPD, for inspiratory and expiratory pressures, respectively. Conclusion: MRP performed with the TrueForce presented good concurrent validity, good testretest reliability, excellent inter-rater reliability for inspiratory pressure and good inter-rater reliability for expiratory pressure. MRP were lower when obtained at FRC for healthy individuals and with COPD. (C) 2021 Associacao Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Fisioterapia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 748
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Emotional and Behavioral Screener: Test-Retest Reliability, Inter-Rater Reliability, and Convergent Validity
    Nordness, Philip D.
    Epstein, Michael H.
    Cullinan, Douglas
    Pierce, Corey D.
    REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2014, 35 (04) : 211 - 217
  • [2] The Neurological Hand Deformity Classification: Construct validity, test-retest, and inter-rater reliability
    Garbellini, Simon
    Randall, Melinda
    Steele, Michael
    Elliott, Catherine
    Imms, Christine
    JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2022, 35 (04) : 581 - 589
  • [3] The functional analysis checklist: Inter-rater and test-retest reliability
    Sturmey, P
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2001, 14 (02) : 141 - 146
  • [4] TEST-RETEST AND INTER-RATER RELIABILITY OF A METHOD TO MEASURE WRIST AND FINGER SPASTICITY
    Gaverth, Johan
    Sandgren, Maria
    Lindberg, Pavel G.
    Forssberg, Hans
    Eliasson, Ann-Christin
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2013, 45 (07) : 630 - 636
  • [5] Inter-Rater and Test-Retest Reliability of the Sensory Integration Clinical Observations
    May-Benson, Teresa A.
    Teasdale, Alison
    PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN PEDIATRICS, 2021, 41 (01) : 74 - 84
  • [6] The behavioral and emotional rating scale: test-retest and inter-rater reliability
    Epstein M.H.
    Harniss M.K.
    Pearson N.
    Ryser G.
    Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1999, 8 (3) : 319 - 327
  • [7] Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of computerized clinical vestibular tools
    Cochrane, Graham D.
    Christy, Jennifer B.
    Kicker, Ethan T.
    Kailey, Ryan P.
    England, Brandon K.
    JOURNAL OF VESTIBULAR RESEARCH-EQUILIBRIUM & ORIENTATION, 2021, 31 (05): : 365 - 373
  • [8] Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the revised diagnostic interview for borderlines
    Zanarini, MC
    Frankenburg, FR
    Vujanovic, AA
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2002, 16 (03) : 270 - 276
  • [9] Test-retest And Inter-rater Reliability Of The Functional Lower Extremity Evaluation
    Hodgins, Melissa
    Haitz, Karyn
    Shultz, Rebecca
    Matheson, Gordon
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2013, 45 (05): : 395 - 395
  • [10] Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS):: Inter-rater and test-retest reliability and validity in a Spanish population
    Roca, Miguel
    Martin-Santos, Rocio
    Saiz, Jeronimo
    Obiols, Jordi
    Serrano, Maria J.
    Torrens, Marta
    Subira, Susana
    Gili, Margalida
    Navines, Ricard
    Ibanez, Angela
    Nadal, Marcos
    Barrantes, Nieves
    Canellas, Francesca
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 22 (01) : 44 - 48