Energy Savings and Cost-benefit Analysis of the New Commercial Building Standard in China

被引:7
|
作者
Zhao, Shanguo [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Shicong [3 ]
Hou, Jing [4 ]
Zhou, Nan [1 ]
Levine, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] SouthEast Univ, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] China Acad Bldg Res, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Commercial building; Energy efficiency standard; Reference building; Cost-benefit; Simulation; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1074
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this paper, a comprehensive comparison of the commercial building energy efficiency standard between the previous 2005 version and the new proposed version is conducted, including the energy efficiency analysis and cost-benefit analysis. To better understand the tech-economic performance of the new Chinese standard, energy models were set up based on a typical commercial office building in Chinese climate zones. The building energy standard in 2005 is used as the baseline for this analysis. Key building technologies measures are analyzed individually, including roof, wall, window, lighting and chiller and so on and finally whole building cost-benefit analysis was conducted. Results show that the new commercial building energy standard demonstrates good cost-effective performance, with whole building payback period around 4 years (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 324
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-benefit and cost-savings analyses of antiarrhythmic medication monitoring
    Snider, Melissa
    Carnes, Cynthia
    Grover, Janel
    Davis, Rich
    Kalbfleisch, Steven
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2012, 69 (18) : 1569 - 1573
  • [42] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hybrid Photovoltaic/Thermal Collectors in a Nearly Zero-Energy Building
    Conti, Paolo
    Schito, Eva
    Testi, Daniele
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (08)
  • [43] COST-BENEFIT AS NEW UTILITARIANISM
    CODDINGTON, A
    [J]. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 1971, 42 (03): : 320 - 325
  • [44] Cost-benefit analysis methodology for PHM applied to legacy commercial aircraft
    Leao, Bruno P.
    Fitzgibbon, Kevin T.
    Puttini, Lucas C.
    de Melo, Gustavo P. B.
    [J]. 2008 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-9, 2008, : 3585 - 3597
  • [45] Incremental cost-benefit quantitative assessment of green building: A case study in China
    Wu, Zhijiang
    Ma, Guofeng
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 269
  • [46] Cost-benefit analysis: New foundations on shifting sand
    Sinden, Amy
    Kysar, Douglas A.
    Driesen, David M.
    [J]. REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2009, 3 (01) : 48 - 71
  • [47] Cost-benefit analysis of the Mandatory Standard for wastewater discharge to water bodies
    Rojas, F
    Serhan, G
    Volantin, S
    [J]. INGENIERIA HIDRAULICA EN MEXICO, 1997, 12 (01): : 27 - 40
  • [48] Cost-Benefit Analysis of China's Internet Content Regulation
    Song, Qiang
    Li, Gang
    [J]. FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION ASSURANCE AND SECURITY, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 571 - 575
  • [49] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Pumped Hydroelectricity Storage Investment in China
    Sospiro, Paolo
    Nibbi, Leonardo
    Liscio, Marco Ciro
    De Lucia, Maurizio
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (24)
  • [50] Building Cost-Benefit Models of Information Interactions
    Azzopardi, Leif
    [J]. CHIIR'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 CONFERENCE HUMAN INFORMATION INTERACTION AND RETRIEVAL, 2017, : 425 - 428