Coronavirus Goes Viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 Misinformation Epidemic on Twitter

被引:516
|
作者
Kouzy, Ramez [1 ]
Jaoude, Joseph Abi [1 ]
Kraitem, Afif [1 ]
El Alam, Molly B. [2 ]
Karam, Basil [1 ]
Adib, Elio [1 ]
Zarka, Jabra [1 ]
Traboulsi, Cindy [1 ]
Akl, Elie W. [1 ]
Baddour, Khalil [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Fac Med, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Publ Hlth, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
coronavirus; twitter; social media; epidemic; public health; pandemic; infodemic; covid-19;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.7255
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, misinformation has been spreading uninhibited over traditional and social media at a rapid pace. We sought to analyze the magnitude of misinformation that is being spread on Twitter (Twitter, Inc., San Francisco, CA) regarding the coronavirus epidemic. Materials and methods We conducted a search on Twitter using 14 different trending hashtags and keywords related to the COVID-19 epidemic. We then summarized and assessed individual tweets for misinformation in comparison to verified and peer-reviewed resources. Descriptive statistics were used to compare terms and hashtags, and to identify individual tweets and account characteristics. Results The study included 673 tweets. Most tweets were posted by informal individuals/groups (66%), and 129 (19.2%) belonged to verified Twitter accounts. The majority of included tweets contained serious content (91.2%); 548 tweets (81.4%) included genuine information pertaining to the COVID-19 epidemic. Around 70% of the tweets tackled medical/public health information, while the others were pertaining to sociopolitical and financial factors. In total, 153 tweets (24.8%) included misinformation, and 107 (17.4%) included unverifiable information regarding the COVID-19 epidemic. The rate of misinformation was higher among informal individual/group accounts (33.8%, p: <0.001). Tweets from unverified Twitter accounts contained more misinformation (31.0% vs 12.6% for verified accounts, p: <0.001). Tweets from healthcare/public health accounts had the lowest rate of unverifiable information (12.3%, p: 0.04). The number of likes and retweets per tweet was not associated with a difference in either false or unverifiable content. The keyword "COVID-19" had the lowest rate of misinformation and unverifiable information, while the keywords "#2019_ncov" and "Corona" were associated with the highest amount of misinformation and unverifiable content respectively. Conclusions Medical misinformation and unverifiable content pertaining to the global COVID-19 epidemic are being propagated at an alarming rate on social media. We provide an early quantification of the magnitude of misinformation spread and highlight the importance of early interventions in order to curb this phenomenon that endangers public safety at a time when awareness and appropriate preventive actions are paramount.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Identifying the Adoption or Rejection of Misinformation Targeting COVID-19 Vaccines in Twitter Discourse
    Weinzierl, Maxwell
    Harabagiu, Sanda
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM WEB CONFERENCE 2022 (WWW'22), 2022, : 3196 - 3205
  • [32] Different types of COVID-19 misinformation have different emotional valence on Twitter
    Charquero-Ballester, Marina
    Walter, Jessica G.
    Nissen, Ida A.
    Bechmann, Anja
    [J]. BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2021, 8 (02):
  • [33] Transformers for COVID-19 Misinformation Detection on Twitter: A South African Case Study
    Strydom, Irene Francesca
    Grobler, Jacomine
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, OPTIMIZATION, AND DATA SCIENCE, LOD 2022, PT I, 2023, 13810 : 197 - 210
  • [34] SmartEye: Detecting COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter for Mitigating Public Health Risk
    Liu, Jinwei
    Gong, Rui
    Zhou, Wci
    [J]. 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA AND SMART COMPUTING, BIGCOMP, 2023, : 330 - 331
  • [35] The Twitter pandemic: The critical role of Twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Rosenberg, Hans
    Syed, Shahbaz
    Rezaie, Salim
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 22 (04) : 418 - 421
  • [36] Recommendations for Surgery During the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Epidemic
    Zheng Liu
    Yawei Zhang
    Xishan Wang
    Daming Zhang
    Dechang Diao
    K. Chandramohan
    Christopher M. Booth
    [J]. Indian Journal of Surgery, 2020, 82 : 124 - 128
  • [37] Recommendations for Surgery During the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Epidemic
    Liu, Zheng
    Zhang, Yawei
    Wang, Xishan
    Zhang, Daming
    Diao, Dechang
    Chandramohan, K.
    Booth, Christopher M.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 82 (02) : 124 - 128
  • [38] COVID-19 compared to other epidemic coronavirus diseases and the flu
    James A Ayukekbong
    Michel L Ntemgwa
    Solange A Ayukekbong
    Eta E Ashu
    Terence A Agbor
    [J]. World Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2020, (01) : 1 - 13
  • [39] Positive externalities of an epidemic: The case of the coronavirus (COVID-19) in China
    Okyere, Michael A.
    Forson, Richmond
    Essel-Gaisey, Felix
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 92 (09) : 1376 - 1379
  • [40] Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): not one epidemic but four
    Woolley, Ian
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2020, 50 (06) : 657 - 658