Coronavirus Goes Viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 Misinformation Epidemic on Twitter

被引:514
|
作者
Kouzy, Ramez [1 ]
Jaoude, Joseph Abi [1 ]
Kraitem, Afif [1 ]
El Alam, Molly B. [2 ]
Karam, Basil [1 ]
Adib, Elio [1 ]
Zarka, Jabra [1 ]
Traboulsi, Cindy [1 ]
Akl, Elie W. [1 ]
Baddour, Khalil [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Fac Med, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Publ Hlth, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
coronavirus; twitter; social media; epidemic; public health; pandemic; infodemic; covid-19;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.7255
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, misinformation has been spreading uninhibited over traditional and social media at a rapid pace. We sought to analyze the magnitude of misinformation that is being spread on Twitter (Twitter, Inc., San Francisco, CA) regarding the coronavirus epidemic. Materials and methods We conducted a search on Twitter using 14 different trending hashtags and keywords related to the COVID-19 epidemic. We then summarized and assessed individual tweets for misinformation in comparison to verified and peer-reviewed resources. Descriptive statistics were used to compare terms and hashtags, and to identify individual tweets and account characteristics. Results The study included 673 tweets. Most tweets were posted by informal individuals/groups (66%), and 129 (19.2%) belonged to verified Twitter accounts. The majority of included tweets contained serious content (91.2%); 548 tweets (81.4%) included genuine information pertaining to the COVID-19 epidemic. Around 70% of the tweets tackled medical/public health information, while the others were pertaining to sociopolitical and financial factors. In total, 153 tweets (24.8%) included misinformation, and 107 (17.4%) included unverifiable information regarding the COVID-19 epidemic. The rate of misinformation was higher among informal individual/group accounts (33.8%, p: <0.001). Tweets from unverified Twitter accounts contained more misinformation (31.0% vs 12.6% for verified accounts, p: <0.001). Tweets from healthcare/public health accounts had the lowest rate of unverifiable information (12.3%, p: 0.04). The number of likes and retweets per tweet was not associated with a difference in either false or unverifiable content. The keyword "COVID-19" had the lowest rate of misinformation and unverifiable information, while the keywords "#2019_ncov" and "Corona" were associated with the highest amount of misinformation and unverifiable content respectively. Conclusions Medical misinformation and unverifiable content pertaining to the global COVID-19 epidemic are being propagated at an alarming rate on social media. We provide an early quantification of the magnitude of misinformation spread and highlight the importance of early interventions in order to curb this phenomenon that endangers public safety at a time when awareness and appropriate preventive actions are paramount.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter
    Shahi, Gautam Kishore
    Dirkson, Anne
    Majchrzak, Tim A.
    [J]. Online Social Networks and Media, 2021, 22
  • [2] Twitter Analysis of Covid-19 Misinformation in Spain
    Saby, Diego
    Philippe, Olivier
    Buslon, Nataly
    del Valle, Javier
    Puig, Oriol
    Salaverria, Ramon
    Jose Rementeria, Maria
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL DATA AND SOCIAL NETWORKS, CSONET 2021, 2021, 13116 : 267 - 278
  • [3] Misinformation Dissemination in Twitter in the COVID-19 Era
    Krittanawong, Chayakrit
    Narasimhan, Bharat
    Virk, Hafeez Ul Hassan
    Narasimhan, Harish
    Hahn, Joshua
    Wang, Zhen
    Tang, W. H. Wilson
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 133 (12): : 1367 - 1369
  • [4] Misinformation in the context of Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19)
    Nemer, David
    [J]. ATOZ-NOVAS PRATICAS EM INFORMACAO E CONHECIMENTO, 2020, 9 (02): : 113 - 116
  • [5] Monkeypox goes viral: measuring the misinformation outbreak on Twitter
    Ortiz-Martinez, Yeimer
    Sarmiento, Jheinner
    Bonilla-Aldana, D. Katterine
    Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2022, 16 (07): : 1218 - 1220
  • [6] Machine Learning in Detecting COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter
    Alenezi, Mohammed N.
    Alqenaei, Zainab M.
    [J]. FUTURE INTERNET, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [7] CMTA: COVID-19 Misinformation Multilingual Analysis on Twitter
    Pranesh, Raj Ratn
    Farokhnejad, Mehrdad
    Shekhar, Ambesh
    Vargas-Solar, Genoveva
    [J]. ACL-IJCNLP 2021: THE 59TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS AND THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING: PROCEEDINGS OF THE STUDENT RESEARCH WORKSHOP, 2021, : 270 - 283
  • [8] NOVEL CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) EPIDEMIC
    Passi, Gouri Rao
    [J]. INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2020, 57 (03) : 275 - 275
  • [9] Going viral: misinformation in the time of COVID-19
    不详
    [J]. LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 3 (06): : E393 - E393
  • [10] Are Mutated Misinformation More Contagious? A Case Study of COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter
    Yan, Muheng
    Lin, Yu-Ru
    Chung, Wen-Ting
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH ACM WEB SCIENCE CONFERENCE, WEBSCI 2022, 2022, : 336 - 347