An efficient method to measure the semantic similarity of ontologies

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, James Z. [1 ]
Ali, Farha [1 ]
Srimani, Pradip K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
With the recent availability of large number of bioinformatics data sources, query from such databases and rigorous annotation of experimental results often use semantic frameworks in the form of an ontology. With the growing access to heterogeneous and independent data repositories, determining the semantic similarity or difference of two ontologies is critical in information retrieval, information integration and semantic web services. In this paper, a sense refinement algorithm is proposed to construct a refined sense set (RSS) for an ontology so that the senses (synonym words) in this refined sense set represent the semantic meanings of the terms used by this ontology. In addition, a semantic set that combines the refined sense set of ontology with the relationship edges connecting the terms in this ontology is proposed to represent the semantics of this ontology. With the semantic sets, measuring the semantic similarity or difference of two ontologies is simplified as comparing the commonality or difference of two sets. The experimental studies show that the proposed method of measuring the semantic similarity or difference of two ontologies is efficient and accurate.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 458
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An efficient method to measure the semantic similarity of ontologies
    Wang, James
    Ali, Farha
    Srimani, Pradip
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERVASIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 6 (01) : 88 - +
  • [2] A combined fuzzy semantic similarity measure in OWL ontologies
    Cannella, Vincenzo
    Russo, Giuseppe
    Sangiorgi, Pierluca
    Pirrone, Roberto
    [J]. WEBIST 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 2, 2008, : 181 - 186
  • [3] Semantic Similarity in Biomedical Ontologies
    Pesquita, Catia
    Faria, Daniel
    Falcao, Andre O.
    Lord, Phillip
    Couto, Francisco M.
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2009, 5 (07)
  • [4] Semantic similarity and machine learning with ontologies
    Kulmanov, Maxat
    Smaili, Fatima Zohra
    Gao, Xin
    Hoehndorf, Robert
    [J]. BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2021, 22 (04)
  • [5] Fuzzy Ontologies in Semantic Similarity Measures
    Chandran, David
    Crockett, Keeley
    [J]. 2016 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2016, : 4942 - 4949
  • [6] Selecting a semantic similarity measure for concepts in two different CAD model data ontologies
    Lu, Wenlong
    Qin, Yuchu
    Qi, Qunfen
    Zeng, Wenhan
    Zhong, Yanru
    Liu, Xiaojun
    Jiang, Xiangqian
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2016, 30 (03) : 449 - 466
  • [7] A semantic similarity method based on information content exploiting multiple ontologies
    Sanchez, David
    Batet, Montserrat
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (04) : 1393 - 1399
  • [8] A novel method for merging academic social network ontologies using formal concept analysis and hybrid semantic similarity measure
    Priya, M.
    Ch, Aswani Kumar
    [J]. LIBRARY HI TECH, 2020, 38 (02) : 399 - 419
  • [9] A new method to measure the semantic similarity of GO terms
    Wang, James Z.
    Du, Zhidian
    Payattakool, Rapeeporn
    Yu, Philip S.
    Chen, Chin-Fu
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2007, 23 (10) : 1274 - 1281
  • [10] A novel method to measure the semantic similarity of HPO terms
    Peng, Jiajie
    Xue, Hansheng
    Shao, Yukai
    Shang, Xuequn
    Wang, Yadong
    Chen, Jin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DATA MINING AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2017, 17 (02) : 173 - 188