Selecting a semantic similarity measure for concepts in two different CAD model data ontologies

被引:17
|
作者
Lu, Wenlong [1 ]
Qin, Yuchu [1 ]
Qi, Qunfen [2 ]
Zeng, Wenhan [2 ]
Zhong, Yanru [3 ]
Liu, Xiaojun [1 ]
Jiang, Xiangqian [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech Sci & Engn, State Key Lab Digital Mfg Equipment & Technol, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Huddersfield, Sch Comp & Engn, EPSRC Ctr Innovat Mfg Adv Metrol, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Guilin Univ Elect Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Informat Secur, Guangxi Coll & Univ Key Lab Intelligent Proc Comp, Guilin 541004, Peoples R China
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Similarity measure selection; Semantic similarity measure; Similarity calculation accuracy; CAD model data ontology; Concept; Weight; PRODUCT; INTEROPERABILITY; DESIGN; FRAMEWORK; EXCHANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.aei.2016.06.001
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Semantic similarity measure technology based approach is one of the most popular approaches aiming at implementing semantic mapping between two different CAD model data ontologies. The most important problem in this approach is how to measure the semantic similarities of concepts between two different ontologies. A number of measure methods focusing on this problem have been presented in recent years. Each method can work well between its specific ontologies. But it is unclear how accurate the measured semantic similarities in these methods are. Moreover, there is yet no evidence that any of the methods presented how to select a measure with high similarity calculation accuracy. To compensate for such deficiencies, this paper proposes a method for selecting a semantic similarity measure with high similarity calculation accuracy for concepts in two different CAD model data ontologies. In this method, the similarity calculation accuracy of each candidate measure is quantified using Pearson correlation coefficient or residual sum of squares. The measure with high similarity calculation accuracy is selected through a comparison of the Pearson correlation coefficients or the residual sums of squares of all candidate measures. The paper also reports an implementation of the proposed method, provides an example to show how the method works, and evaluates the method by theoretical and experimental comparisons. The evaluation result suggests that the measure selected by the proposed method has good human correlation and high similarity calculation accuracy. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 466
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An efficient method to measure the semantic similarity of ontologies
    Wang, James
    Ali, Farha
    Srimani, Pradip
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERVASIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 6 (01) : 88 - +
  • [2] An efficient method to measure the semantic similarity of ontologies
    Wang, James Z.
    Ali, Farha
    Srimani, Pradip K.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN GRID AND PERVASIVE COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5036 : 447 - 458
  • [3] Semantic Similarity between Concepts based on OWL Ontologies
    Xiao Min
    Zhong Luo
    Xiong Qianxing
    [J]. WKDD: 2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 749 - +
  • [4] A combined fuzzy semantic similarity measure in OWL ontologies
    Cannella, Vincenzo
    Russo, Giuseppe
    Sangiorgi, Pierluca
    Pirrone, Roberto
    [J]. WEBIST 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 2, 2008, : 181 - 186
  • [5] Semantic Similarity between Ontologies at Different Scales
    Qingpeng Zhang
    David Haglin
    [J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3 (02) : 132 - 140
  • [6] Semantic Similarity between Ontologies at Different Scales
    Zhang, Qingpeng
    Haglin, David
    [J]. IEEE-CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, 2016, 3 (02) : 132 - 140
  • [7] A fuzzy contrast model to measure semantic similarity between OWL DL concepts
    Qiu, Ming
    Chen, Gang
    Dong, Jinxiang
    [J]. FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4223 : 951 - 960
  • [8] Measuring Semantic Similarity Between Biomedical Concepts Within Multiple Ontologies
    Al-Mubaid, Hisham
    Nguyen, Hoa A.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS, 2009, 39 (04): : 389 - 398
  • [9] Methodology for Similarity Assessment of Relational Data Models and Semantic Ontologies
    Zarembo, Imants
    Teilans, Artis
    Barghorn, Knut
    Merkuryev, Yuri
    Berina, Gundega
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS INFORMATICS, MODELLING AND SIMULATION (SIMS 2016), 2016, : 119 - 123
  • [10] Ontology-based Measure of Semantic Similarity between Concepts
    Shi Bin
    Fang Liying
    Yan Jianzhuo
    Wang Pu
    Zhao Zhongcheng
    [J]. 2009 WRI WORLD CONGRESS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 109 - 112