Quantifying the observational requirements of a space-borne LiDAR snow mission

被引:8
|
作者
Kwon, Yonghwan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yoon, Yeosang [2 ,4 ]
Forman, Barton A. [1 ]
Kumar, Sujay, V [2 ]
Wang, Lizhao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, A James Clark Sch Engn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] NASA, Hydrol Sci Lab, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Earth Syst Sci Interdisciplinary Ctr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Sci Applicat Int Corp, Mclean, VA 22102 USA
关键词
Snow water equivalent; LiDAR; Snow depth retrieval error; Swath width; Synthetic fraternal twin; NASA Land Information System; LAND-SURFACE MODEL; ENVIRONMENT SIMULATOR JULES; DATA ASSIMILATION; WATER STORAGE; SOIL-MOISTURE; INFORMATION-SYSTEM; SCANNING LIDAR; NORTH-AMERICA; COVERED AREA; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126709
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study quantifies the level of observational accuracy required from a spaceborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) snow depth retrieval mission for enabling beneficial impacts for snow estimation. The study is conducted over a region in Western Colorado using a suite of observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs). The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator, version 5.0 (JULES v5.0) is employed to simulate a suite of idealized LiDAR observations, considering a range of LiDAR snow depth retrieval errors, different hypothetical sensor swath widths, and the impact of cloud cover on observability. These simulated observations are then assimilated into the Noah land surface model with multi-parameterization options, version 3.6 (Noah-MP v3.6) model. This data assimilation setup is used to systematically evaluate the potential utility of LiDAR observations for improving modeled snow water equivalent (SWE) estimates and water budget variables such as runoff. Results from the OSSE runs show that, in general, assimilation of synthetic LiDAR observations provide beneficial impacts when the LiDAR snow depth retrieval error standard deviation (sigma(error)) is below 60 cm. Based on comparisons between the realistic (i.e., swath-limited and cloud-attenuated) case and the idealized (i.e., infinite swath width in the absence of cloud cover) case, this study concludes that observations with a conservative error standard deviation threshold of 40 cm (i.e., upper limit of the snow depth retrieval error that adds value to the SWE estimates via assimilation) are needed for improving modeled snow estimates. More than a 33% reduction in SWE root mean square errors and more than a 15% increase in correlation coefficients are achieved when sigma(error) = 40 cm using a 170-km sensor swath width in the presence of cloud attenuation effects. Further, the integrated hydrologic response, as represented by total (surface and subsurface) runoff estimates during the snow ablation season, are also enhanced when assimilating synthetic LiDAR snow depth retrievals with errors below this level.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Liquid crystal cell for space-borne laser rangefinder to space mission applications
    Nowinowski-Kruszelnicki, E.
    Jaroszewicz, L.
    Raszewski, Z.
    Soms, L.
    Piecek, W.
    Perkowski, P.
    Kedzierski, J.
    Dabrowski, R.
    Olifierczuk, M.
    Garbat, K.
    Miszczyk, E.
    OPTO-ELECTRONICS REVIEW, 2012, 20 (04) : 315 - 322
  • [22] APPLICATION OF MULTIPLE-SCATTERING POLARIZATION LIDAR FOR THE EVALUATION OF SPACE-BORNE LIDAR ALGORITHMS
    Okamoto, Hajime
    Sato, Kaori
    Katagiri, Shuichiro
    Fujikawa, Masahiro
    Nishizawa, Tomoaki
    Sugimoto, Nobuo
    Jin, Yoshitaka
    Shimizu, Atsushi
    Ishimoto, Hiroshi
    28TH INTERNATIONAL LASER RADAR CONFERENCE (ILRC 28), 2018, 176
  • [23] Assessment of requirements for a proposed space-borne cloud profiling radar
    Lemke, H
    Quante, M
    Danne, O
    Raschke, E
    Girard, R
    Park, P
    Ingmann, P
    Baptista, PP
    28TH CONFERENCE ON RADAR METEOROLOGY, 1997, : 113 - 114
  • [24] Large-and-Sparse-particle Clouds (LSC): Clouds which are subvisible for space-borne lidar and observable for space-borne cloud radar
    Iwasaki, Suginori
    Seguchi, Takafumi
    Okamoto, Hajime
    Sato, Kaori
    Katagiri, Shuichiro
    Fujiwara, Masatomo
    Shibata, Takashi
    Tsuboki, Kazuhisa
    Ono, Takashi
    Sugidachi, Takuji
    POLAR SCIENCE, 2019, 21 : 117 - 123
  • [25] The features of radar observations of snow cover from space-borne carriers
    Center for Radiophysical Sensing of the Earth, NAS, NSA of Ukraine, Proskura st. 12, Kharkiv, Ukraine
    不详
    Telecommun Radio Eng, 2007, 12 (1133-1141):
  • [26] Snow Density Retrieval in Quebec Using Space-Borne SMOS Observations
    Gao, Xiaowen
    Pan, Jinmei
    Peng, Zhiqing
    Zhao, Tianjie
    Bai, Yu
    Yang, Jianwei
    Jiang, Lingmei
    Shi, Jiancheng
    Husi, Letu
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [27] Variable step length method for optical adjustment in Space-borne lidar
    Zhang Wenjing
    Xu Chidong
    Cai Yi
    SEVENTH SYMPOSIUM ON NOVEL PHOTOELECTRONIC DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 11763
  • [28] Forestry Applications of Space-Borne LiDAR Sensors: A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis
    Aguilar, Fernando J.
    Rodriguez, Francisco A.
    Aguilar, Manuel A.
    Nemmaoui, Abderrahim
    Alvarez-Taboada, Flor
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (04)
  • [29] POTENTIAL RETRIEVAL OF AEROSOL MICROPHYSICS FROM MULTISTATIC SPACE-BORNE LIDAR
    Levitan, Nathaniel
    Gross, Barry
    Moshary, Fred
    Wu, Yonghua
    28TH INTERNATIONAL LASER RADAR CONFERENCE (ILRC 28), 2018, 176
  • [30] Development of a compact space-borne Lidar for atmospheric aerosol and cloud detection
    Chen, Jianfeng
    Xie, Chenbo
    Ji, Jie
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 309