Economic viability of using thermal energy storage for flexible carbon capture on natural gas power plants

被引:2
|
作者
Limb, Braden J. [1 ]
Markey, Ethan [1 ]
Vercellino, Roberto [1 ]
Garland, Shane [1 ]
Pisciotta, Maxwell [2 ]
Psarras, Peter [2 ]
Herber, Daniel R. [1 ]
Bandhauer, Todd [1 ]
Quinn, Jason C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, 1374 Campus Delivery, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
Natural gas power plant; Emissions reduction; Thermal energy storage; Techno-economic analysis; POSTCOMBUSTION CO2 CAPTURE; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY; GENERATION; OPERATION; HYDROGEN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2022.105836
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Fossil fuel-based power plants generate 80 % of the electricity in the United States and provide a reliable gen-eration source for both base and peak power demands. These plants are expected to adapt to changes in envi-ronmental policies that will require carbon management with carbon capture and storage (CCS) representing a possible solution. Current solvent-based CCS has a detrimental impact on a power plant's performance due to large heat loads required for carbon capture solvent regeneration. This parasitic load restricts the power plant's output and operation flexibility. Therefore, this study evaluates the feasibility of using thermal storage tech-nologies for natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants coupled with CCS to minimize the impact of solvent regeneration and enable the plant to operate at peak power output. Thermal storage can minimize the impact of CCS on the power plant by providing the heat load required for solvent regeneration during times of peak demand which will allow the plant to operate unrestricted and at full power. In total, fifteen unique thermal storage configurations were evaluated from three thermal storage categories: Brayton cycle heat pump, vapor compression heat pump, and heat recovery steam generator steam extraction for storage. The viability of these systems was determined by evaluating each configuration on thousands of real-world Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) profiles from the New York Independent System Operator and California Independent System Operator electricity markets using a techno-economic analysis. Results were compared to the performance of a base power plant (NGCC with CCS and no thermal storage) to determine the impact of thermal storage on power plant economics. Overall, six of the thermal storage configurations performed better than base CCS enabled power plant on between 11.5 % and 38.7 % of the LMP signals evaluated. The best performing configuration was a vapor compression heat pump that used flue gas as the working fluid and had both hot and cold thermal storage units. This configuration performed better than the base CCS power plant on 38.7 % of the LMP profiles. The results of this study show thermal storage can mitigate the economic impact of carbon capture solvent regen-eration on NGCC power plants. Discussion focuses on the impact of electricity pricing on the optimal thermal storage system, the advantages and disadvantages of the systems evaluated, and identifies limitations with the study.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Low-carbon Economic Dispatch Model with Combined Wind-storage System and Carbon Capture Power Plants
    Zhang, Rufeng
    Chen, Houhe
    Li, Xue
    Jiang, Tao
    Li, Guoqing
    Ning, Ruoxi
    2017 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2017,
  • [42] Low-carbon economic dispatch for electricity and natural gas systems considering carbon capture systems and power-to-gas
    He, Liangce
    Lu, Zhigang
    Zhang, Jiangfeng
    Geng, Lijun
    Zhao, Hao
    Li, Xueping
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 224 : 357 - 370
  • [43] Utilizing the thermal energy from natural gas engines and the cold energy of liquid natural gas to satisfy the heat, power, and cooling demands of carbon capture and storage in maritime decarbonization: engineering, enhancement, and 4E analysis
    Hai, Tao
    Basem, Ali
    Shami, Hayder Oleiwi
    Sabri, Laith S.
    Rajab, Husam
    Farqad, Rand Otbah
    Hussein, Abbas Hameed Abdul
    Alhaidry, Wesam Abed A. L. Hassan
    Idan, Ameer Hassan
    Singh, Narinderjit Singh Sawaran
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 19 : 2093 - 2107
  • [44] Flexible operation of thermal plants with integrated energy storage technologies
    Efthymia Ioanna Koytsoumpa
    Christian Bergins
    Emmanouil Kakaras
    Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 54 : 2453 - 2460
  • [45] Flexible operation of thermal plants with integrated energy storage technologies
    Koytsoumpa, Efthymia Ioanna
    Bergins, Christian
    Kakaras, Emmanouil
    HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2018, 54 (08) : 2453 - 2460
  • [46] FLEXIBLE NATURAL GAS / INTERMITTENT RENEWABLE HYBRID POWER PLANTS
    Welch, Michael
    Pym, Andrew
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 2017,
  • [47] Current status, challenges and future prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) for thermal power plants in Brazil
    Allah, Fazal Um Min
    Marques, Adriano da Silva
    Carvalho, Monica
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2024, 136
  • [48] Thermal integration of a natural gas combined cycle power plant with carbon capture and utilization technologies
    Esquivel-Patino, Gerardo G.
    Napoles-Rivera, Fabricio
    Jimenez-Gutierrez, Arturo
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 295
  • [49] THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE FOR CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PLANTS
    Kuravi, Sarada
    Goswami, Yogi
    Stefanakos, Elias K.
    Ram, Manoj
    Jotshi, Chand
    Pendyala, Swetha
    Trahan, Jamie
    Sridharan, Prashanth
    Rahman, Muhammad
    Krakow, Burton
    TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION, 2012, 14 (02) : 81 - 91
  • [50] Challenges in the Thermal Energy Storage for Solar Power Plants
    Wibbenmeyer, Linda
    Craig, Jim
    Smith, Tony
    NANOTECHNOLOGY 2012, VOL 3: BIO SENSORS, INSTRUMENTS, MEDICAL, ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY, 2012, : 641 - 644