Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Chemotherapy Alone for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma: JCOG0506

被引:59
|
作者
Ishii, Hiroshi [1 ]
Furuse, Junji [2 ]
Boku, Narikazu [3 ]
Okusaka, Takuji [4 ]
Ikeda, Masafumi [5 ]
Ohkawa, Shinichi [6 ]
Fukutomi, Akira [3 ]
Hamamoto, Yasuo [7 ]
Nakamura, Kenichi [8 ]
Fukude, Haruhiko [8 ]
机构
[1] Canc Inst Hosp, Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Div, Koto Ku, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
[2] Kyorin Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Shizuoka Canc Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Shizuoka, Japan
[4] Natl Canc Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp E, Chiba, Japan
[6] Kanagawa Canc Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Kanagawa, Japan
[7] Tochigi Canc Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan
[8] Natl Canc Ctr, Ctr Canc Control & Informat Serv, Ctr Data, Japan Clin Oncol Grp, Tokyo 104, Japan
关键词
locally advanced pancreatic cancer; gemcitabine; chemotherapy; chemoradiotherapy; PROTRACTED 5-FLUOROURACIL INFUSION; CONCURRENT RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER; TRIAL; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; OXALIPLATIN; CHEMORADIATION; ADENOCARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hyq011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil has been accepted as a standard care for locally advanced pancreatic cancer; however, it has not been shown to be superior to chemotherapy alone in the gemcitabine era. The present multicentre phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Gem monotherapy against locally advanced pancreatic cancer in comparison with the historical data of chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil. Methods: Eligibility criteria included patients with histologically proven locally advanced pancreatic cancer, all lesions encompassed by a square of 15 cm on one side, no prior treatment, good performance status and adequate organ function. Gemcitabine was given intravenously at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on days 1, 8 and 15, repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was %1-year survival. Expected and threshold %1-year survival were 40 and 25%, respectively. Results: Between January 2006 and February 2007, 50 locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients were registered. The major grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropaenia (62%), thrombocytopaenia (18%), fatigue (12%) and infection-biliary tree (12%). Haematological toxicity was mostly transient and there was no episode of infection with grade 3-4 neutropaenia. Up to the final follow-up in February 2009, the median overall survival was 15.0 months with a %1-year survival of 64.0%. Conclusions: Gemcitabine monotherapy demonstrated far better survival than historical data for chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil with mild toxicities. Gemcitabine could be consider as a standard treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Trial Registration: This trial was registered in UMIN-CTR (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm), identification number (C000000308).
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 579
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced bilharzial bladder carcinoma
    Khaled, H. M.
    Hamza, M. R.
    Mansour, O.
    Gaafar, R.
    Zaghloul, M. S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 : S34 - S37
  • [32] Multicenter phase-I/II study using a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in metastasized and unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma
    Ridwelski, K
    Fahlke, J
    Kuhn, R
    Hribaschek, A
    Kettner, E
    Greiner, C
    Florschuetz, A
    Manger, T
    Wilhelm, G
    Klein, H
    Hahnfeld, S
    Lippert, H
    Meyer, F
    EJSO, 2006, 32 (03): : 297 - 302
  • [33] A randomized phase II study comparing gemcitabine plus nadroparine versus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: The GEMFRAX trial.
    Voorthuizen, T. V.
    Vervenne, W. L.
    Van Daalen, E. H.
    Phoa, S. S.
    Gouma, D. J.
    Bruno, M. J.
    Richel, D. J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 205S - 205S
  • [34] Phase I study of olaparib plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumours and comparison with gemcitabine alone in patients with locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Bendell, J.
    O'Reilly, E. M.
    Middleton, M. R.
    Chau, I.
    Hochster, H.
    Fielding, A.
    Burke, W.
    Burris, H., III
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (04) : 804 - 811
  • [35] Phase II study to assess the efficacy of gemcitabine chemotherapy followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Chang, S. T.
    Goodman, K. A.
    Quon, A.
    Le, Q. T.
    Fisher, G. A.
    Kuo, T.
    Ford, J. M.
    Norton, J.
    Yang, G. P.
    Koong, A. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S295 - S296
  • [36] Gemcitabine-based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Wang, Bu-Hai
    Cao, Wen-Miao
    Yu, Jie
    Wang, Xiao-Lei
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2012, 13 (05) : 2129 - 2132
  • [37] Phase II study of concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy in locally advanced stage IIIB cervical carcinoma
    Pattaranutaporn, P
    Thirapakawong, C
    Chansilpa, Y
    Therasakvichya, S
    Ieumwananontachai, N
    Thephamongkhol, K
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 81 (03) : 404 - 407
  • [38] A phase II study of gemcitabine in advanced cervix carcinoma
    Goedhals, L
    Bezwoda, WR
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A : 1180 - 1180
  • [39] Phase II study of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Carmichael, J
    Fink, U
    Russell, RCG
    Spittle, MF
    Harris, AL
    Spiessi, G
    Blatter, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 73 (01) : 101 - 105
  • [40] A phase II study of gemcitabine and flutamide in advanced pancreatic cancer
    Mayer, A
    Shaw, J
    'Ath, SD
    Price, P
    Blesing, C
    Corrie, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 83 : 18 - 18