Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, and maximum and minimum LDL cholesterol in diabetes mellitus

被引:7
|
作者
Sheng, Chang-Sheng [1 ]
Miao, Ya [2 ]
Ding, Lili [3 ,4 ]
Cheng, Yi [1 ]
Wang, Dan [1 ]
Yang, Yulin [2 ]
Tian, Jingyan [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Shanghai Inst Hypertens,Sch Med, Dept Cardiovasc Med,State Key Lab Med Genom,Shang, 197 Ruijin Er Rd, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, State Key Lab Med Genom,Clin Trial Ctr,Sch Med, Dept Endocrine & Metab Dis,Shanghai Inst Endocrin, 197 Ruijin Er Rd, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Inst Chinese Mat Med, Shanghai Key Lab Complex Prescript, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Inst Chinese Mat Med, MOE Key Lab Standardizat Chinese Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
LDL cholesterol; Variability; Diabetes mellitus; ACCORD trial; DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; BLOOD-PRESSURE; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ASSOCIATION; EVENTS; PARTICIPANTS; METAANALYSIS; EFFICACY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/s12944-022-01628-8
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background Current guidelines for dyslipidemia management recommend that the LDL-C goal be lower than 70 mg/dL. The present study investigated the prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability in LDL-C, and minimum and maximum LDL-C during follow-up in diabetes mellitus. Methods The risk of outcomes in relation to visit-to-visit LDL-C variability was investigated in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Lipid trial. LDL-C variability indices were coefficient of variation (CV), variability independent of the mean (VIM), and average real variability (ARV). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were employed to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Compared with the placebo group (n=2667), the fenofibrate therapy group (n=2673) had a significantly (P<0.01) lower mean plasma triglyceride (152.5 vs. 178.6 mg/dL), and total cholesterol (158.3 vs.162.9 mg/dL) but a similar mean LDL-C during follow-up (88.2 vs. 88.6 mg/dL, P>0.05). All three variability indices were associated with primary outcome, total mortality and cardiovascular mortality both in the total population and in the fenofibrate therapy group but only with primary outcome in the placebo group. The minimum LDL-C but not the maximum during follow-up was significantly associated with various outcomes in the total population, fenofibrate therapy and placebo group. The minimum LDL-C during follow-up >= 70 mg/dL was associated with an increased risk for various outcomes. Conclusions Visit-to-visit variability in LDL-C was a strong predictor of outcomes, independent of mean LDL-C. Patients with LDL-C controlled to less than 70 mg/dL during follow-up might have a benign prognosis. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT 00000620.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The importance of instability and visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure
    Schillaci, Giuseppe
    Pucci, Giacomo
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2010, 8 (08) : 1095 - 1097
  • [32] Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability in Cardiovascular Disease
    Lukitasari, Mifetika
    Liaw, Siaw-Teng
    Jalaludin, Bin
    Jonnagaddala, Jitendra
    MEDINFO 2023 - THE FUTURE IS ACCESSIBLE, 2024, 310 : 1358 - 1359
  • [33] Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability An Insight Into the Mechanisms
    Mancia, Giuseppe
    HYPERTENSION, 2016, 68 (01) : 32 - 33
  • [34] Visit-to-visit variability of glycemia and vascular complications: the Hoorn Diabetes Care System cohort
    Roderick C. Slieker
    Amber A. W. H. van der Heijden
    Giel Nijpels
    Petra J. M. Elders
    Leen M. ’t Hart
    Joline W. J. Beulens
    Cardiovascular Diabetology, 18
  • [35] Clinical implication of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability
    Hoshide, Satoshi
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2018, 41 (12) : 993 - 999
  • [36] Visit-To-Visit Blood Pressure Variability: More to Come
    Gavriilaki, Eleni
    Gkaliagkousi, Eugenia
    Douma, Stella
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2015, 17 (02): : 116 - 117
  • [37] Clinical implication of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability
    Satoshi Hoshide
    Hypertension Research, 2018, 41 : 993 - 999
  • [38] Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability in Alzheimer Disease
    Lattanzi, Simona
    Viticchi, Giovanna
    Falsetti, Lorenzo
    Buratti, Laura
    Luzzi, Simona
    Provinciali, Leandro
    Silvestrini, Mauro
    ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 2014, 28 (04): : 347 - 351
  • [39] Visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability and microvascular complications among patients with diabetes
    Sohn, Min-Woong
    Epstein, Noam
    Huang, Elbert S.
    Huo, Zhiping
    Emanuele, Nicholas
    Stukenborg, George
    Guihan, Marylou
    Li, Junping
    Budiman-Mak, Elly
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 2017, 31 (01) : 195 - 201
  • [40] Visit-to-visit blood lipid variability as predictors of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Li, C. -I.
    Li, T. -C.
    Lin, C. -C.
    Liu, C. -S.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2020, 63 (SUPPL 1) : S144 - S145