Methods of high-throughput plant phenotyping for large-scale breeding and genetic experiments

被引:2
|
作者
Afonnikov, D. A. [1 ,2 ]
Genaev, M. A. [1 ]
Doroshkov, A. V. [1 ]
Komyshev, E. G. [1 ]
Pshenichnikova, T. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Cytol & Genet, Siberian Branch, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
[2] Novosibirsk State Univ, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
plant phenomics; breeding and genetic experiment; high-throughput phenotyping; image analysis; databases; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; IMAGE-ANALYSIS PIPELINE; ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA; LEAF PUBESCENCE; CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE; INFORMATION-SYSTEM; ANALYSIS PLATFORM; QTL ANALYSIS; GROWTH; ROOT;
D O I
10.1134/S1022795416070024
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Phenomics is a field of science at the junction of biology and informatics which solves the problems of rapid, accurate estimation of the plant phenotype; it was rapidly developed because of the need to analyze phenotypic characteristics in large scale genetic and breeding experiments in plants. It is based on using the methods of computer image analysis and integration of biological data. Owing to automation, new approaches make it possible to considerably accelerate the process of estimating the characteristics of a phenotype, to increase its accuracy, and to remove a subjectivism (inherent to humans). The main technologies of high-throughput plant phenotyping in both controlled and field conditions, their advantages and disadvantages, and also the prospects of their use for the efficient solution of problems of plant genetics and breeding are presented in the review.
引用
收藏
页码:688 / 701
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High-throughput phenotyping
    Gehan, Malia A.
    Kellogg, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2017, 104 (04) : 505 - 508
  • [32] High-throughput phenotyping
    de Souza, Natalie
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2010, 7 (01) : 36 - 36
  • [33] Pitfalls and potential of high-throughput plant phenotyping platforms
    Poorter, Hendrik
    Hummel, Gregoire M.
    Nagel, Kerstin A.
    Fiorani, Fabio
    von Gillhaussen, Philipp
    Virnich, Olivia
    Schurr, Ulrich
    Postma, Johannes A.
    van de Zedde, Rick
    Wiese-Klinkenberg, Anika
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [34] Imaging technologies for plant high-throughput phenotyping:a review
    Yong ZHANG
    Naiqian ZHANG
    [J]. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2018, 5 (04) : 406 - 419
  • [35] Leveraging Image Analysis for High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping
    Choudhury, Sruti Das
    Samal, Ashok
    Awada, Tala
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 10
  • [36] Automatic Quantification of Stomata for High-throughput Plant Phenotyping
    Bhugra, Swati
    Mishra, Deepak
    Anupama, Anupama
    Chaudhury, Santanu
    Lall, Brejesh
    Chugh, Archana
    [J]. 2018 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION (ICPR), 2018, : 3904 - 3910
  • [37] Imaging technologies for plant high-throughput phenotyping: a review
    Zhang, Yong
    Zhang, Naiqian
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 5 (04) : 406 - 419
  • [38] High-Throughput Phenotyping and QTL Mapping Reveals the Genetic Architecture of Maize Plant Growth
    Zhang, Xuehai
    Huang, Chenglong
    Wu, Di
    Qiao, Feng
    Li, Wenqiang
    Duan, Lingfeng
    Wang, Ke
    Xiao, Yingjie
    Chen, Guoxing
    Liu, Qian
    Xiong, Lizhong
    Yang, Wanneng
    Yan, Jianbing
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 173 (03) : 1554 - 1564
  • [39] SPOT: Scanning plant IoT facility for high-throughput plant phenotyping
    Lantin, Stephen
    McCourt, Kelli
    Butcher, Nicholas
    Puri, Varun
    Esposito, Martha
    Sanchez, Sasha
    Ramirez-Loza, Francisco
    McLamore, Eric
    Correll, Melanie
    Singh, Aditya
    [J]. HARDWAREX, 2023, 15
  • [40] High-throughput phenotyping of wheat seminal root traits in a breeding context
    Richard, Cecile
    Hickey, Lee
    Fletcher, Susan
    Chenu, Karine
    Borrell, Andrew
    Christopher, Jack
    [J]. AGRICULTURE AND CLIMATE CHANGE - ADAPTING CROPS TO INCREASED UNCERTAINTY (AGRI 2015), 2015, 29 : 102 - 103