Alum treatment of poultry litter: Decomposition and nitrogen dynamics

被引:26
|
作者
Gilmour, JT
Koehler, MA
Cabrera, ML
Szajdak, L
Moore, PA
机构
[1] John Gilmour Inc, Fayetteville, AR 72702 USA
[2] HazMert Inc, Rogers, AR 72756 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Univ Arkansas, USDA ARS, Poultry Prod & Prod Safety Lab, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2004.0402
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While the poultry industry is a major economic benefit to several areas in the USA, land application of poultry litter to recycle nutrients can lead to impaired surface and ground water quality. Amending poultry litter with alum [Al-3(SO4)(2).14H(2)O] has received considerable attention as a method of economically reducing ammonia volatilization in the poultry house and soluble phosphorus in runoff waters. The objective of this study was to characterize the effect of alum on broiler litter decomposition and N dynamics under laboratory conditions. Litter that had been amended with alum in the poultry house after each of the first four of five flock cycles (Experiment I) and litter that had been amended with alum after removal from a poultry house after the third flock cycle (Experiment II) were compared with unamended litter in separate studies. The litters in Experiment I were surface-applied to simulate application to grasslands, while the litters in Experiment II were incorporated to simulate application to conventionally tilled crops. The only statistically significant differences in decomposition due to alum occurred early in Experiment 11 and the differences were small. The only statistically significant differences in net N mineralization, soil inorganic N, and soil NH4+-N in either experiment was found in Experiment I after 70 d of incubation where soil inorganic N was significantly greater for the alum treatment. Thus, alum had little effect on decomposition or N dynamics. Results of many of the studies on litter not amended with alum should be applicable to litters amended with alum to reduce P availability.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 405
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ESTIMATING PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN IN POULTRY LITTER
    GILMOUR, JT
    GALE, PM
    ARKANSAS FARM RESEARCH, 1986, 35 (01): : 5 - 5
  • [22] RELEASE OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS FROM POULTRY LITTER
    ROBINSON, JS
    SHARPLEY, AN
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1995, 24 (01) : 62 - 67
  • [23] CARBON AND NITROGEN MINERALIZATION KINETICS FOR POULTRY LITTER
    GALE, PM
    GILMOUR, JT
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1986, 15 (04) : 423 - 426
  • [24] XANES spectroscopic analysis of phosphorus speciation in alum-amended poultry litter
    Seiter, Jennifer M.
    Staats-Borda, Kristin E.
    Ginder-Vogel, Matthew
    Sparks, Donald L.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2008, 37 (02) : 477 - 485
  • [25] LITTER DECOMPOSITION IN SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN BLACK LOCUST AND PINE HARDWOOD STANDS - LITTER QUALITY AND NITROGEN DYNAMICS
    WHITE, DL
    HAINES, BL
    BORING, LR
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1988, 18 (01): : 54 - 63
  • [26] DECOMPOSITION OF URIC ACID IN BUILT UP POULTRY LITTER
    SCHEFFERLE, HE
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BACTERIOLOGY, 1965, 28 (03): : 412 - +
  • [27] Litter decomposition and nitrogen dynamics in aspen forest and mixed-grass prairie
    Kochy, M
    Wilson, SD
    ECOLOGY, 1997, 78 (03) : 732 - 739
  • [28] Dynamics of phosphorus and nitrogen through litter fall and decomposition in a tropical mangrove forest
    Ramos e Silva, Carlos A.
    Oliveira, Sergio R.
    Rego, Ronaldo D. P.
    Mozeto, Antonio A.
    MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2007, 64 (04) : 524 - 534
  • [29] Differential controls of water input on litter decomposition and nitrogen dynamics in the Patagonian steppe
    Yahdjian, L
    Sala, O
    Austin, AT
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2006, 9 (01) : 128 - 141
  • [30] Differential Controls of Water Input on Litter Decomposition and Nitrogen Dynamics in the Patagonian Steppe
    Laura Yahdjian
    Osvaldo E. Sala
    Amy T. Austin
    Ecosystems, 2006, 9 : 128 - 141