The Clinical Significance of Right Coronary Artery Stenosis on the Prognosis of Patients with Unprotected Left Main Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:0
|
作者
Lu, Tse-Min [1 ,2 ]
Jou, Yu-Lan [3 ]
Chen, Ying-Hwa [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Lung-Ching [1 ,2 ]
Sung, Shih-Hsien [1 ,2 ]
Chan, Wan-Leong [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Shing-Jong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, Dept Internal Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[3] Taipei City Hosp, Yang Ming Branch, Div Internal Med, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Left main stenting; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Right coronary artery; ELUTING STENT IMPLANTATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Although coronary artery bypass grafting remains the standard treatment for unprotected left main (LM) coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the use of stent has become an alternative treatment. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the real-world results of patients with LM disease treated with PCI and compare the impact of significant right coronary artery (RCA) disease on the short-term and long-term outcomes of these patients. Methods and Results: A total of 164 patients were included, with 95 patients (57.9%) with significant RCA stenosis and 69(42.1%) patients without, and were followed up over a mean period of 2.5 years. EuroSCORE >= 6 was noted in 78 patients (47.6%). Within the 30-day period after index procedure, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were observed in 16 (9.9%) patients, including 15 (9.3%) deaths, and 1 non-fatal myocardial infarction (0.6%). Three patients suffered from probable sub-acute stent thrombosis (1.8%). In the stepwise multivariate Cox regression analysis, female gender, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% and RCA disease were identified as the significant independent predictors of 30-day deaths and MACE. As for the long-term outcomes, the mean follow-up period was 2.5 years (range 1 month to 9.7 years, median 23.4 months). There were 38 deaths (23.6%), and 57 MACE (35.4%). The survival of LM patients with RCA disease remained worse than that of those without (p < 0.01), and concomitant RCA disease remained significant prognostic predictor after being adjusted by other variables. Conclusion: In this real-world practice in a single center, we found that unprotected LM stenting in patients with concomitant significant stenosis of RCA may be associated with worse early and long-term outcomes compared with those without RCA disease.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 20
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Surgical Ineligibility and Mortality Among Patients With Unprotected Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Waldo, Stephen W.
    Secemsky, Eric A.
    O'Brien, Cashel
    Kennedy, Kevin F.
    Pomerantsev, Eugene
    Sundt, Thoralf M., III
    McNulty, Edward J.
    Scirica, Benjamin M.
    Yeh, Robert W.
    CIRCULATION, 2014, 130 (25) : 2295 - 2301
  • [22] Sex Difference Among Patients with Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Northern China
    Wang, Yongxin
    Yang, Zhiqiang
    Yuan, Yonggang
    Xu, Zesheng
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2018, 21 (04): : E322 - +
  • [23] Outcomes of coronary artery interventions: Comparing coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with unprotected left main stenosis
    Crouse, Sarah B.
    Kitko, Lisa A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2014, 26 (02) : 91 - 101
  • [24] COMPARISON OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING WITH PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION FOR UNPROTECTED LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
    Kawecki, D.
    Morawiec, B.
    Fudal, M.
    Milejski, W.
    Jachec, W.
    Kozielska, E. Nowalany
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 147 : S42 - S42
  • [25] Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
    Kawecki, Damian
    Morawiec, Beata
    Fudal, Marcin
    Milejski, Wojciech
    Jachec, Wojciech
    Nowalany-Kozielska, Ewa
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (01) : 58 - 67
  • [26] Is Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Now the Default Revascularization Strategy for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis?
    Mukherjee, Debabrata
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2022, 11 (07):
  • [27] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Stenosis
    Taha, Yasir
    Patel, Rajan A. G.
    Bagai, Jayant
    Sachdeva, Rajesh
    Kumar, Gautam
    Prasad, Anand
    Nathan, Sandeep
    Paul, Timir K.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 21 (05)
  • [28] The effectiveness and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention on unprotected left main coronary arterial stenosis patients
    Wang Yuexi
    Rong, A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (16) : C148 - C148
  • [29] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Stenosis
    Yasir Taha
    Rajan A. G. Patel
    Jayant Bagai
    Rajesh Sachdeva
    Gautam Kumar
    Anand Prasad
    Sandeep Nathan
    Timir K. Paul
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2019, 21
  • [30] Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis
    Hsu, Jen Te
    Chu, Chi Ming
    Chang, Shih Tai
    Kao, Chiung Lun
    Chung, Chang Min
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 49 (03) : 355 - 370