LINAC-based on-board imaging feasibility and the dosimetric consequences of head roll in head-and-neck IMRT plans

被引:45
|
作者
Kim, Gwe-Ya
Pawlicki, Todd [1 ]
Le, Quynh-Thu
Luxton, Gary
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiat Oncol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
CBCT; volumetric localization; head and neck; IMRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2007.05.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Kilovoltage imaging systems on linear accelerators are used for patient localization in many clinics. The purpose of this work is to assess on-board imaging (OBI) detection of systematic setup errors and in particular, the dosimetric consequences of undetected head roll in head-and-neck intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans when using these systems. The system used in this study was the Trilogy linear accelerator and associated software (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Accuracy of OBI localization was evaluated using an anthropomorphic head phantom. The head phantom is rigidly attached to a specially designed positioning device with 5 degrees of freedom, 3 translational and 2 rotational in the axial and coronal planes. Simulated setup errors were 3 degrees and 5 degrees rotations in the axial plane and displacements of 5 mm in the left-right, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior directions. The coordinates set by the positioning device were compared with the coordinates obtained as measured by using the image matching tools of paired 2-dimensional (2D) orthogonal image matching, and 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CT) volume matching. In addition, 6 physician-approved IMRT plans of nasopharynx and tonsil carcinoma were recalculated to evaluate the impact of undetected 3 degrees and 5 degrees head roll. Application of cone-beam CT (CBCT) for patient localization was superior to 2D matching techniques for detecting rotational setup errors. The use of CBCT allowed the determination of translational errors to within 0.5 mm, whereas kV planar was within I to 2 mm. Head roll in the axial plane was not easily detected with orthogonal image sets. Compared to the IMRT plans with no head roll, dose-volume histogram analysis demonstrated an average increase in the maximal spinal cord dose of 3.1% and 6.4% for 3 degrees and 5 degrees angles of rotation, respectively. Dose to the contralateral parotid was unchanged with 3 degrees roll and increased by 2.7% with 5 degrees roll. The results of this study show that volumetric setup verification using CBCT can improve bony anatomy setup detection to millimeter accuracy, and is a reliable method to detect head roll. However, the magnitude of possible dose errors due to undetected head roll suggests that CBCT does not need to be performed on a daily basis but rather weekly or bi-weekly to ensure fidelity of the head position with the immobilization system. (c) 2008 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 99
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric IMRT plans comparison between helical tomotherapy and linac-based IMRT for head and neck cancer
    Zefkili, S.
    Fancois, P.
    Mazal, A.
    Giraudz, P.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S207 - S208
  • [2] Quantification of dosimetric impact of implementation of on-board imaging (OBI) for imrt treatment of head-and-neck malignancies
    Lawsonm, Joshua D.
    Elder, Eric
    Fox, Tim
    Davis, Lawrence
    Crocker, Ian
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2007, 32 (04) : 287 - 294
  • [3] IMRT dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linac-based IMRT and helical tornotherapy
    Molloy, J
    Sheng, K
    Read, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02): : S359 - S360
  • [4] DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY AND LINAC-IMRT TREATMENT PLANS FOR HEAD AND NECK CANCER PATIENTS
    Zhang, Xin
    Penagaricano, Jose
    Moros, Eduardo G.
    Corry, Peter M.
    Yan, Yulong
    Ratanatharathorn, Vaneerat
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2010, 35 (04) : 264 - 268
  • [5] REPEAT COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING TO DETECT DOSIMETRIC CHANGES FOR HEAD AND NECK IMRT PLANS
    Garibaldi, C.
    Rondi, E.
    Comi, S.
    Alterio, D.
    Jereczek-Fossa, B. A.
    Ferrari, A.
    Zerini, D.
    Pedroli, G.
    Orecchia, R.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 : S86 - S86
  • [6] Dosimetric consequences of Interobserver target delineation for head and neck IMRT
    Kuritzky, N.
    Morgan, P.
    Li, S.
    Miyamoto, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S1 - S1
  • [7] DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION OF AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION FOR ADAPTIVE IMRT FOR HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER
    Tsuji, Stuart Y.
    Hwang, Andrew
    Weinberg, Vivian
    Yom, Sue S.
    Quivey, Jeanne M.
    Xia, Ping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (03): : 707 - 714
  • [8] Comparison of head-and-neck treatment plans on MR-Linac versus CBCT-Linac.
    Bouwmans, R.
    Schoenmakers, M.
    Raaijmakers, N.
    De Ridder, M.
    Philippens, M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S250 - S251
  • [9] The Dosimetric/Clinical Impact on Parotids of Weight Change During Head-and-Neck IMRT
    Charpentier, A.
    Aubry, J.
    Fortin, B.
    Coulombe, G.
    Lambert, L.
    Nguyen-Tan, P.
    Filion, E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S476 - S477
  • [10] DOSIMETRIC CONSEQUENCES OF ANATOMIC VARIATIONS DURING HEAD-AND-NECK RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT
    Marguet, M.
    Warren, S.
    Bordage, M. C.
    Garcia, R.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S443 - S443